In-situ evaluation of two concrete slab systems. II: Evaluation criteria and outcomes

Paul H. Ziehl, Nestore Galati, Antonio Nanni, J. Gustavo Tumialan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The primary objective of in-situ load testing is to evaluate the safety and serviceability of an existing structural system with respect to a particular load condition and effect. In light of technological advances in construction methods, analytical tools and monitoring instrumentation, new different evaluation criteria are being proposed in addition to different in-situ load test methods. Some criteria may be more appropriate than others based on the expected damage and failure mechanisms of the structure being considered. The companion paper describes the rationale and application of both a consolidated and an alternative approach to the determination of load level, loading procedure and instrumentation requirements for two case studies. This paper discusses in detail the evaluation criteria and outcomes of these two field projects consisting of a posttensioned concrete slab with structural deficiencies due to tendon and mild reinforcement misplacement and a floor bay of a two-way reinforced concrete slab showing cracking at the positive and negative moment regions. After discussing the relative merits of the evaluation methodologies and the significance of their respective acceptance thresholds, concepts for the development of a new global criterion are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-227
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2008

Keywords

  • Concrete slabs
  • Concrete structures
  • Field tests
  • In situ tests
  • Instrumentation
  • Load tests
  • Safety
  • Serviceability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In-situ evaluation of two concrete slab systems. II: Evaluation criteria and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this