Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions: Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications

Sheri L. Johnson, Matthew V. Elliott, Charles S. Carver

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theory about the conceptual basis of psychiatric disorders has long emphasized negative emotionality. More recent ideas emphasize roles for positive emotionality and impulsivity as well. This review examines impulsive responses to positive and negative emotions, which have been labeled as urgency. Urgency is conceptually and empirically distinct from other forms of impulsivity. A large body of work indicates that urgency is more robustly related to psychopathology than are other forms of impulsivity. Researchers have considered 4 neurocognitive models of urgency: excessive emotion generation, poor emotion regulation, risky decision making, and poor cognitive control. Little evidence supports emotion generation or risky decision making as the core issues driving urgency. Rather, urgency appears related to dysfunction in key hubs implicated in the integration of cognitive control and emotion regulation (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula), expressed as response inhibition deficits that emerge most robustly in high arousal contexts. These neurocognitive processes appear remarkably parallel for positive and negative urgency. We provide methodological suggestions and theoretical hypotheses to guide future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)338-349
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Psychiatry
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2020

Fingerprint

Emotions
Impulsive Behavior
Decision Making
Arousal
Prefrontal Cortex
Psychopathology
Psychiatry
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Emotion
  • Imaging
  • Impulsivity
  • Psychopathology
  • Urgency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions : Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications. / Johnson, Sheri L.; Elliott, Matthew V.; Carver, Charles S.

In: Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 87, No. 4, 15.02.2020, p. 338-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8a7d2549c13f431a9e306015b0f0b291,
title = "Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions: Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications",
abstract = "Theory about the conceptual basis of psychiatric disorders has long emphasized negative emotionality. More recent ideas emphasize roles for positive emotionality and impulsivity as well. This review examines impulsive responses to positive and negative emotions, which have been labeled as urgency. Urgency is conceptually and empirically distinct from other forms of impulsivity. A large body of work indicates that urgency is more robustly related to psychopathology than are other forms of impulsivity. Researchers have considered 4 neurocognitive models of urgency: excessive emotion generation, poor emotion regulation, risky decision making, and poor cognitive control. Little evidence supports emotion generation or risky decision making as the core issues driving urgency. Rather, urgency appears related to dysfunction in key hubs implicated in the integration of cognitive control and emotion regulation (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula), expressed as response inhibition deficits that emerge most robustly in high arousal contexts. These neurocognitive processes appear remarkably parallel for positive and negative urgency. We provide methodological suggestions and theoretical hypotheses to guide future research.",
keywords = "Cognition, Emotion, Imaging, Impulsivity, Psychopathology, Urgency",
author = "Johnson, {Sheri L.} and Elliott, {Matthew V.} and Carver, {Charles S.}",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "338--349",
journal = "Biological Psychiatry",
issn = "0006-3223",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impulsive Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions

T2 - Parallel Neurocognitive Correlates and Their Implications

AU - Johnson, Sheri L.

AU - Elliott, Matthew V.

AU - Carver, Charles S.

PY - 2020/2/15

Y1 - 2020/2/15

N2 - Theory about the conceptual basis of psychiatric disorders has long emphasized negative emotionality. More recent ideas emphasize roles for positive emotionality and impulsivity as well. This review examines impulsive responses to positive and negative emotions, which have been labeled as urgency. Urgency is conceptually and empirically distinct from other forms of impulsivity. A large body of work indicates that urgency is more robustly related to psychopathology than are other forms of impulsivity. Researchers have considered 4 neurocognitive models of urgency: excessive emotion generation, poor emotion regulation, risky decision making, and poor cognitive control. Little evidence supports emotion generation or risky decision making as the core issues driving urgency. Rather, urgency appears related to dysfunction in key hubs implicated in the integration of cognitive control and emotion regulation (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula), expressed as response inhibition deficits that emerge most robustly in high arousal contexts. These neurocognitive processes appear remarkably parallel for positive and negative urgency. We provide methodological suggestions and theoretical hypotheses to guide future research.

AB - Theory about the conceptual basis of psychiatric disorders has long emphasized negative emotionality. More recent ideas emphasize roles for positive emotionality and impulsivity as well. This review examines impulsive responses to positive and negative emotions, which have been labeled as urgency. Urgency is conceptually and empirically distinct from other forms of impulsivity. A large body of work indicates that urgency is more robustly related to psychopathology than are other forms of impulsivity. Researchers have considered 4 neurocognitive models of urgency: excessive emotion generation, poor emotion regulation, risky decision making, and poor cognitive control. Little evidence supports emotion generation or risky decision making as the core issues driving urgency. Rather, urgency appears related to dysfunction in key hubs implicated in the integration of cognitive control and emotion regulation (e.g., the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula), expressed as response inhibition deficits that emerge most robustly in high arousal contexts. These neurocognitive processes appear remarkably parallel for positive and negative urgency. We provide methodological suggestions and theoretical hypotheses to guide future research.

KW - Cognition

KW - Emotion

KW - Imaging

KW - Impulsivity

KW - Psychopathology

KW - Urgency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075323775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075323775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.08.018

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31668478

AN - SCOPUS:85075323775

VL - 87

SP - 338

EP - 349

JO - Biological Psychiatry

JF - Biological Psychiatry

SN - 0006-3223

IS - 4

ER -