Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology

Charles S Carver, Sheri L. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Impulsiveness has been studied as an aspect of personality and psychopathology for generations. There are longstanding disagreements about how to define it and whether it should be viewed as one construct or several. This article begins by briefly reviewing some earlier and some more recent work on impulsiveness. Several approaches have recently converged to focus on a distinction between impulsive reactions to emotion and impulsive properties that are not initiated by emotion. From this review, we turn to psychopathology. It is well known that impulsiveness is related to externalizing psychopathology, but some have concluded that a similar relation does not exist for internalizing psychopathology. A recent literature is described that challenges the latter conclusion, linking impulsive reactivity to emotion to both externalizing and internalizing aspects of psychopathology. Discussion then turns to emotionrelated impulsiveness and other constructs to which it is conceptually and empirically related, reexamining whether other conceptual targets should be added to the discussion. The article closes with a consideration of how important it is to continue to remain open to new conceptual perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1067-1078
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Psychopathology
Emotions
Personality

Keywords

  • Dual process
  • Externalizing
  • Impulsiveness
  • Internalizing
  • Psychopathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology. / Carver, Charles S; Johnson, Sheri L.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 73, No. 9, 01.12.2018, p. 1067-1078.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a1e0272135a044699f813fc6549d3093,
title = "Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology",
abstract = "Impulsiveness has been studied as an aspect of personality and psychopathology for generations. There are longstanding disagreements about how to define it and whether it should be viewed as one construct or several. This article begins by briefly reviewing some earlier and some more recent work on impulsiveness. Several approaches have recently converged to focus on a distinction between impulsive reactions to emotion and impulsive properties that are not initiated by emotion. From this review, we turn to psychopathology. It is well known that impulsiveness is related to externalizing psychopathology, but some have concluded that a similar relation does not exist for internalizing psychopathology. A recent literature is described that challenges the latter conclusion, linking impulsive reactivity to emotion to both externalizing and internalizing aspects of psychopathology. Discussion then turns to emotionrelated impulsiveness and other constructs to which it is conceptually and empirically related, reexamining whether other conceptual targets should be added to the discussion. The article closes with a consideration of how important it is to continue to remain open to new conceptual perspectives.",
keywords = "Dual process, Externalizing, Impulsiveness, Internalizing, Psychopathology",
author = "Carver, {Charles S} and Johnson, {Sheri L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000387",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1067--1078",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology

AU - Carver, Charles S

AU - Johnson, Sheri L.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Impulsiveness has been studied as an aspect of personality and psychopathology for generations. There are longstanding disagreements about how to define it and whether it should be viewed as one construct or several. This article begins by briefly reviewing some earlier and some more recent work on impulsiveness. Several approaches have recently converged to focus on a distinction between impulsive reactions to emotion and impulsive properties that are not initiated by emotion. From this review, we turn to psychopathology. It is well known that impulsiveness is related to externalizing psychopathology, but some have concluded that a similar relation does not exist for internalizing psychopathology. A recent literature is described that challenges the latter conclusion, linking impulsive reactivity to emotion to both externalizing and internalizing aspects of psychopathology. Discussion then turns to emotionrelated impulsiveness and other constructs to which it is conceptually and empirically related, reexamining whether other conceptual targets should be added to the discussion. The article closes with a consideration of how important it is to continue to remain open to new conceptual perspectives.

AB - Impulsiveness has been studied as an aspect of personality and psychopathology for generations. There are longstanding disagreements about how to define it and whether it should be viewed as one construct or several. This article begins by briefly reviewing some earlier and some more recent work on impulsiveness. Several approaches have recently converged to focus on a distinction between impulsive reactions to emotion and impulsive properties that are not initiated by emotion. From this review, we turn to psychopathology. It is well known that impulsiveness is related to externalizing psychopathology, but some have concluded that a similar relation does not exist for internalizing psychopathology. A recent literature is described that challenges the latter conclusion, linking impulsive reactivity to emotion to both externalizing and internalizing aspects of psychopathology. Discussion then turns to emotionrelated impulsiveness and other constructs to which it is conceptually and empirically related, reexamining whether other conceptual targets should be added to the discussion. The article closes with a consideration of how important it is to continue to remain open to new conceptual perspectives.

KW - Dual process

KW - Externalizing

KW - Impulsiveness

KW - Internalizing

KW - Psychopathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058146217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058146217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000387

DO - 10.1037/amp0000387

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 1067

EP - 1078

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 9

ER -