Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients

Nesrin Dogan, Jeffery V. Siebers, Paul J. Keall, Fritz Lerma, Yan Wu, Mirek Fatyga, Jeffrey F. Williamson, Rupert K. Schmidt-Ullrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9% to -4.9%, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9% to 7.0%. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2%, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91% to 6.99%. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0%, while the OCESC reached to -7.0%. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4033-4043
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Levonorgestrel
Parotid Gland
Therapeutics
Brain Stem
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Spinal Cord
Neck
Head

Keywords

  • Dose calculation accuracy
  • Dose-prediction error
  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
  • Monte Carlo
  • Optimization-convergence error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Dogan, N., Siebers, J. V., Keall, P. J., Lerma, F., Wu, Y., Fatyga, M., ... Schmidt-Ullrich, R. K. (2006). Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Medical Physics, 33(11), 4033-4043. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2357835

Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. / Dogan, Nesrin; Siebers, Jeffery V.; Keall, Paul J.; Lerma, Fritz; Wu, Yan; Fatyga, Mirek; Williamson, Jeffrey F.; Schmidt-Ullrich, Rupert K.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2006, p. 4033-4043.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dogan, N, Siebers, JV, Keall, PJ, Lerma, F, Wu, Y, Fatyga, M, Williamson, JF & Schmidt-Ullrich, RK 2006, 'Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients', Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 4033-4043. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2357835
Dogan, Nesrin ; Siebers, Jeffery V. ; Keall, Paul J. ; Lerma, Fritz ; Wu, Yan ; Fatyga, Mirek ; Williamson, Jeffrey F. ; Schmidt-Ullrich, Rupert K. / Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 4033-4043.
@article{1abc111ba96842eaa85efc7f9382b498,
title = "Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients",
abstract = "The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9{\%} to -4.9{\%}, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9{\%} to 7.0{\%}. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2{\%}, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91{\%} to 6.99{\%}. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0{\%}, while the OCESC reached to -7.0{\%}. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.",
keywords = "Dose calculation accuracy, Dose-prediction error, Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), Monte Carlo, Optimization-convergence error",
author = "Nesrin Dogan and Siebers, {Jeffery V.} and Keall, {Paul J.} and Fritz Lerma and Yan Wu and Mirek Fatyga and Williamson, {Jeffrey F.} and Schmidt-Ullrich, {Rupert K.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1118/1.2357835",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "4033--4043",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients

AU - Dogan, Nesrin

AU - Siebers, Jeffery V.

AU - Keall, Paul J.

AU - Lerma, Fritz

AU - Wu, Yan

AU - Fatyga, Mirek

AU - Williamson, Jeffrey F.

AU - Schmidt-Ullrich, Rupert K.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9% to -4.9%, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9% to 7.0%. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2%, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91% to 6.99%. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0%, while the OCESC reached to -7.0%. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.

AB - The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9% to -4.9%, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9% to 7.0%. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2%, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91% to 6.99%. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0%, while the OCESC reached to -7.0%. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.

KW - Dose calculation accuracy

KW - Dose-prediction error

KW - Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)

KW - Monte Carlo

KW - Optimization-convergence error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750569380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750569380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2357835

DO - 10.1118/1.2357835

M3 - Article

C2 - 17153383

AN - SCOPUS:33750569380

VL - 33

SP - 4033

EP - 4043

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -