Improved foraging by switching between diffusion and advection: benefits from movement that depends on spatial context

William F. Fagan, Tyler Hoffman, Daisy Dahiya, Eliezer Gurarie, Robert Stephen Cantrell, Chris Cosner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Animals use different modes of movement at different times, in different locations, and on different scales. Incorporating such context dependence in mathematical models represents a substantial increase in complexity, but creates an opportunity to more fully integrate key biological features. Here, we consider the spatial dynamics of a population of foragers with two subunits. In one subunit, foragers move via diffusion (random search) whereas in the other, foragers move via advection (gradient-following search). Foragers switch back and forth between the subunits as functions of their spatial context (i.e., depending on whether they are inside or outside of a patch, or depending on whether or not they can detect a gradient in resource density). We consider a one-dimensional binary landscape of resource patches and non-habitat and gauge success in terms of how well the mobile foragers overlap with the distribution of resources. Actively switching between dispersal modes can sometimes greatly enhance this spatial overlap relative to the spatial overlap possible when foragers merely blend advection and diffusion modes at all times. Switching between movement modes is most beneficial when organism’s gradient-following abilities are weak compared to its overall capacity for movement, but switching can actually be quite detrimental for organisms that can rapidly follow resource gradients. An organism’s perceptual range plays a critical role in determining the conditions under which switching movement modes benefits versus disadvantages foragers as they seek out resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTheoretical Ecology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

advection
resource
gauge
animal
organism

Keywords

  • Advection
  • Context-dependent movement
  • Diffusion
  • Movement behavior
  • Oriented movement
  • Perception
  • Perceptual range

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Improved foraging by switching between diffusion and advection : benefits from movement that depends on spatial context. / Fagan, William F.; Hoffman, Tyler; Dahiya, Daisy; Gurarie, Eliezer; Cantrell, Robert Stephen; Cosner, Chris.

In: Theoretical Ecology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61a41dfec1074b5d879f398257ac39f2,
title = "Improved foraging by switching between diffusion and advection: benefits from movement that depends on spatial context",
abstract = "Animals use different modes of movement at different times, in different locations, and on different scales. Incorporating such context dependence in mathematical models represents a substantial increase in complexity, but creates an opportunity to more fully integrate key biological features. Here, we consider the spatial dynamics of a population of foragers with two subunits. In one subunit, foragers move via diffusion (random search) whereas in the other, foragers move via advection (gradient-following search). Foragers switch back and forth between the subunits as functions of their spatial context (i.e., depending on whether they are inside or outside of a patch, or depending on whether or not they can detect a gradient in resource density). We consider a one-dimensional binary landscape of resource patches and non-habitat and gauge success in terms of how well the mobile foragers overlap with the distribution of resources. Actively switching between dispersal modes can sometimes greatly enhance this spatial overlap relative to the spatial overlap possible when foragers merely blend advection and diffusion modes at all times. Switching between movement modes is most beneficial when organism’s gradient-following abilities are weak compared to its overall capacity for movement, but switching can actually be quite detrimental for organisms that can rapidly follow resource gradients. An organism’s perceptual range plays a critical role in determining the conditions under which switching movement modes benefits versus disadvantages foragers as they seek out resources.",
keywords = "Advection, Context-dependent movement, Diffusion, Movement behavior, Oriented movement, Perception, Perceptual range",
author = "Fagan, {William F.} and Tyler Hoffman and Daisy Dahiya and Eliezer Gurarie and Cantrell, {Robert Stephen} and Chris Cosner",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12080-019-00434-w",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Theoretical Ecology",
issn = "1874-1738",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved foraging by switching between diffusion and advection

T2 - benefits from movement that depends on spatial context

AU - Fagan, William F.

AU - Hoffman, Tyler

AU - Dahiya, Daisy

AU - Gurarie, Eliezer

AU - Cantrell, Robert Stephen

AU - Cosner, Chris

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Animals use different modes of movement at different times, in different locations, and on different scales. Incorporating such context dependence in mathematical models represents a substantial increase in complexity, but creates an opportunity to more fully integrate key biological features. Here, we consider the spatial dynamics of a population of foragers with two subunits. In one subunit, foragers move via diffusion (random search) whereas in the other, foragers move via advection (gradient-following search). Foragers switch back and forth between the subunits as functions of their spatial context (i.e., depending on whether they are inside or outside of a patch, or depending on whether or not they can detect a gradient in resource density). We consider a one-dimensional binary landscape of resource patches and non-habitat and gauge success in terms of how well the mobile foragers overlap with the distribution of resources. Actively switching between dispersal modes can sometimes greatly enhance this spatial overlap relative to the spatial overlap possible when foragers merely blend advection and diffusion modes at all times. Switching between movement modes is most beneficial when organism’s gradient-following abilities are weak compared to its overall capacity for movement, but switching can actually be quite detrimental for organisms that can rapidly follow resource gradients. An organism’s perceptual range plays a critical role in determining the conditions under which switching movement modes benefits versus disadvantages foragers as they seek out resources.

AB - Animals use different modes of movement at different times, in different locations, and on different scales. Incorporating such context dependence in mathematical models represents a substantial increase in complexity, but creates an opportunity to more fully integrate key biological features. Here, we consider the spatial dynamics of a population of foragers with two subunits. In one subunit, foragers move via diffusion (random search) whereas in the other, foragers move via advection (gradient-following search). Foragers switch back and forth between the subunits as functions of their spatial context (i.e., depending on whether they are inside or outside of a patch, or depending on whether or not they can detect a gradient in resource density). We consider a one-dimensional binary landscape of resource patches and non-habitat and gauge success in terms of how well the mobile foragers overlap with the distribution of resources. Actively switching between dispersal modes can sometimes greatly enhance this spatial overlap relative to the spatial overlap possible when foragers merely blend advection and diffusion modes at all times. Switching between movement modes is most beneficial when organism’s gradient-following abilities are weak compared to its overall capacity for movement, but switching can actually be quite detrimental for organisms that can rapidly follow resource gradients. An organism’s perceptual range plays a critical role in determining the conditions under which switching movement modes benefits versus disadvantages foragers as they seek out resources.

KW - Advection

KW - Context-dependent movement

KW - Diffusion

KW - Movement behavior

KW - Oriented movement

KW - Perception

KW - Perceptual range

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067881422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067881422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12080-019-00434-w

DO - 10.1007/s12080-019-00434-w

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067881422

JO - Theoretical Ecology

JF - Theoretical Ecology

SN - 1874-1738

ER -