Implementation of a nationwide health economic consultation service to assist substance use researchers: Lessons learned

Sean M. Murphy, Jared A. Leff, Benjamin P. Linas, Jake R. Morgan, Kathryn McCollister, Bruce R. Schackman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Health economic evaluation findings assist stakeholders in improving the quality, availability, scalability, and sustainability of evidence-based services, and in maximizing the efficiency of service delivery. The Center for Health Economics of Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders, HCV, and HIV (CHERISH) is a NIDA-funded multi-institutional center of excellence whose mission is to develop and disseminate health-economic research on healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and health-related behaviors that informs substance use disorder treatment policy, and HCV and HIV care of people who use substances. Methods: We designed a consultation service that is free to researchers whose work aligns with CHERISH's mission. The service includes up to six hours of consulting time. After prospective consultees submit their request online, they receive a screening call from the consultation service director, who connects them with a consultant with relevant expertise. Consultees and consultants complete web-based evaluations following the consultation; consultees also complete a six-month follow-up. We report on the status of the service from its inception in July 2015 through June 2017. Results: We have received 28 consultation requests (54% Early Stage Investigators, 57% MD or equivalent, 28% PhD, 61% women) on projects typically related to planning a study or grant application (93%); 71% were HIV/AIDS-related. Leading topics included cost-effectiveness (43%), statistical-analysis/econometrics (36%), cost (32%), cost-benefit (21%), and quality-of-life (18%). All consultees were satisfied with their overall experience, and felt that consultation expectations and objectives were clearly defined and the consultant's expertise was matched appropriately with their needs. Results were similar for consultants, who spent a median of 3 hours on consultations. Conclusions: There is a need for health-economic methodological guidance among substance use, HCV, and HIV researchers. Lessons learned pertain to the feasibility of service provision, the need to implement systems to measure and improve service value, and strategies for service promotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-189
Number of pages5
JournalSubstance Abuse
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2018

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Economics
Research Personnel
Consultants
Health
HIV
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Substance-Related Disorders
Organized Financing
Health Services Research
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Quality of Life
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • economic evaluation
  • HCV
  • health economics
  • health services research
  • HIV
  • opioid use disorder
  • substance use disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Implementation of a nationwide health economic consultation service to assist substance use researchers : Lessons learned. / Murphy, Sean M.; Leff, Jared A.; Linas, Benjamin P.; Morgan, Jake R.; McCollister, Kathryn; Schackman, Bruce R.

In: Substance Abuse, Vol. 39, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 185-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Sean M. ; Leff, Jared A. ; Linas, Benjamin P. ; Morgan, Jake R. ; McCollister, Kathryn ; Schackman, Bruce R. / Implementation of a nationwide health economic consultation service to assist substance use researchers : Lessons learned. In: Substance Abuse. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 185-189.
@article{87a6a39a7b6949b3bd1ff1321cfa21b1,
title = "Implementation of a nationwide health economic consultation service to assist substance use researchers: Lessons learned",
abstract = "Background: Health economic evaluation findings assist stakeholders in improving the quality, availability, scalability, and sustainability of evidence-based services, and in maximizing the efficiency of service delivery. The Center for Health Economics of Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders, HCV, and HIV (CHERISH) is a NIDA-funded multi-institutional center of excellence whose mission is to develop and disseminate health-economic research on healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and health-related behaviors that informs substance use disorder treatment policy, and HCV and HIV care of people who use substances. Methods: We designed a consultation service that is free to researchers whose work aligns with CHERISH's mission. The service includes up to six hours of consulting time. After prospective consultees submit their request online, they receive a screening call from the consultation service director, who connects them with a consultant with relevant expertise. Consultees and consultants complete web-based evaluations following the consultation; consultees also complete a six-month follow-up. We report on the status of the service from its inception in July 2015 through June 2017. Results: We have received 28 consultation requests (54{\%} Early Stage Investigators, 57{\%} MD or equivalent, 28{\%} PhD, 61{\%} women) on projects typically related to planning a study or grant application (93{\%}); 71{\%} were HIV/AIDS-related. Leading topics included cost-effectiveness (43{\%}), statistical-analysis/econometrics (36{\%}), cost (32{\%}), cost-benefit (21{\%}), and quality-of-life (18{\%}). All consultees were satisfied with their overall experience, and felt that consultation expectations and objectives were clearly defined and the consultant's expertise was matched appropriately with their needs. Results were similar for consultants, who spent a median of 3 hours on consultations. Conclusions: There is a need for health-economic methodological guidance among substance use, HCV, and HIV researchers. Lessons learned pertain to the feasibility of service provision, the need to implement systems to measure and improve service value, and strategies for service promotion.",
keywords = "economic evaluation, HCV, health economics, health services research, HIV, opioid use disorder, substance use disorders",
author = "Murphy, {Sean M.} and Leff, {Jared A.} and Linas, {Benjamin P.} and Morgan, {Jake R.} and Kathryn McCollister and Schackman, {Bruce R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/08897077.2018.1449173",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "185--189",
journal = "Substance Abuse",
issn = "0889-7077",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a nationwide health economic consultation service to assist substance use researchers

T2 - Lessons learned

AU - Murphy, Sean M.

AU - Leff, Jared A.

AU - Linas, Benjamin P.

AU - Morgan, Jake R.

AU - McCollister, Kathryn

AU - Schackman, Bruce R.

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - Background: Health economic evaluation findings assist stakeholders in improving the quality, availability, scalability, and sustainability of evidence-based services, and in maximizing the efficiency of service delivery. The Center for Health Economics of Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders, HCV, and HIV (CHERISH) is a NIDA-funded multi-institutional center of excellence whose mission is to develop and disseminate health-economic research on healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and health-related behaviors that informs substance use disorder treatment policy, and HCV and HIV care of people who use substances. Methods: We designed a consultation service that is free to researchers whose work aligns with CHERISH's mission. The service includes up to six hours of consulting time. After prospective consultees submit their request online, they receive a screening call from the consultation service director, who connects them with a consultant with relevant expertise. Consultees and consultants complete web-based evaluations following the consultation; consultees also complete a six-month follow-up. We report on the status of the service from its inception in July 2015 through June 2017. Results: We have received 28 consultation requests (54% Early Stage Investigators, 57% MD or equivalent, 28% PhD, 61% women) on projects typically related to planning a study or grant application (93%); 71% were HIV/AIDS-related. Leading topics included cost-effectiveness (43%), statistical-analysis/econometrics (36%), cost (32%), cost-benefit (21%), and quality-of-life (18%). All consultees were satisfied with their overall experience, and felt that consultation expectations and objectives were clearly defined and the consultant's expertise was matched appropriately with their needs. Results were similar for consultants, who spent a median of 3 hours on consultations. Conclusions: There is a need for health-economic methodological guidance among substance use, HCV, and HIV researchers. Lessons learned pertain to the feasibility of service provision, the need to implement systems to measure and improve service value, and strategies for service promotion.

AB - Background: Health economic evaluation findings assist stakeholders in improving the quality, availability, scalability, and sustainability of evidence-based services, and in maximizing the efficiency of service delivery. The Center for Health Economics of Treatment Interventions for Substance Use Disorders, HCV, and HIV (CHERISH) is a NIDA-funded multi-institutional center of excellence whose mission is to develop and disseminate health-economic research on healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and health-related behaviors that informs substance use disorder treatment policy, and HCV and HIV care of people who use substances. Methods: We designed a consultation service that is free to researchers whose work aligns with CHERISH's mission. The service includes up to six hours of consulting time. After prospective consultees submit their request online, they receive a screening call from the consultation service director, who connects them with a consultant with relevant expertise. Consultees and consultants complete web-based evaluations following the consultation; consultees also complete a six-month follow-up. We report on the status of the service from its inception in July 2015 through June 2017. Results: We have received 28 consultation requests (54% Early Stage Investigators, 57% MD or equivalent, 28% PhD, 61% women) on projects typically related to planning a study or grant application (93%); 71% were HIV/AIDS-related. Leading topics included cost-effectiveness (43%), statistical-analysis/econometrics (36%), cost (32%), cost-benefit (21%), and quality-of-life (18%). All consultees were satisfied with their overall experience, and felt that consultation expectations and objectives were clearly defined and the consultant's expertise was matched appropriately with their needs. Results were similar for consultants, who spent a median of 3 hours on consultations. Conclusions: There is a need for health-economic methodological guidance among substance use, HCV, and HIV researchers. Lessons learned pertain to the feasibility of service provision, the need to implement systems to measure and improve service value, and strategies for service promotion.

KW - economic evaluation

KW - HCV

KW - health economics

KW - health services research

KW - HIV

KW - opioid use disorder

KW - substance use disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057716157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057716157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449173

DO - 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449173

M3 - Article

C2 - 29558284

AN - SCOPUS:85057716157

VL - 39

SP - 185

EP - 189

JO - Substance Abuse

JF - Substance Abuse

SN - 0889-7077

IS - 2

ER -