Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer

Alan Pollack, Deborah A. Kuban, Gunar K. Zagars

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of retrospective and randomized trials have studied the effect of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on locally advanced/high-risk prostate cancer. Of 6 published randomized trials that have compared EBRT plus ADT with EBRT alone, 2 have shown a highly significant overall survival benefit for EBRT plus ADT, and 2 have demonstrated an advantage for the combination in patient subsets based on Gleason score. The results from the positive trials of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT alone, as well as a recent report of a comparison of short-term (6 months) ADT plus EBRT versus long-term (>6 months) ADT plus EBRT, suggest that short-term ADT plus EBRT preferentially lengthens the survival of patients with Gleason score 2 to 6 disease, whereas for Gleason score 8 to 10 disease, prolongation of survival requires long-term ADT plus EBRT. These data are far from clear-cut because there are factors that confound interpretation of the subgroup analyses. Retrospective data on patients with positive lymph node status support the assertion that EBRT plus ADT prolongs survival to a greater degree than either treatment given individually. The weight of the available investigations on the survival effect of EBRT plus ADT supports its use on a routine basis for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The results with long-term ADT are much more convincing than short-term ADT, and, as a consequence, 2 to 3 years are recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-31
Number of pages10
JournalUrology
Volume60
Issue number3 SUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Androgens
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Radiation
Survival
Neoplasm Grading
Therapeutics
Lymph Nodes
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer. / Pollack, Alan; Kuban, Deborah A.; Zagars, Gunar K.

In: Urology, Vol. 60, No. 3 SUPPL. 1, 01.09.2002, p. 22-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pollack, Alan ; Kuban, Deborah A. ; Zagars, Gunar K. / Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer. In: Urology. 2002 ; Vol. 60, No. 3 SUPPL. 1. pp. 22-31.
@article{6c2c93b73f1c47bb93e64a1ae8f20657,
title = "Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer",
abstract = "A number of retrospective and randomized trials have studied the effect of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on locally advanced/high-risk prostate cancer. Of 6 published randomized trials that have compared EBRT plus ADT with EBRT alone, 2 have shown a highly significant overall survival benefit for EBRT plus ADT, and 2 have demonstrated an advantage for the combination in patient subsets based on Gleason score. The results from the positive trials of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT alone, as well as a recent report of a comparison of short-term (6 months) ADT plus EBRT versus long-term (>6 months) ADT plus EBRT, suggest that short-term ADT plus EBRT preferentially lengthens the survival of patients with Gleason score 2 to 6 disease, whereas for Gleason score 8 to 10 disease, prolongation of survival requires long-term ADT plus EBRT. These data are far from clear-cut because there are factors that confound interpretation of the subgroup analyses. Retrospective data on patients with positive lymph node status support the assertion that EBRT plus ADT prolongs survival to a greater degree than either treatment given individually. The weight of the available investigations on the survival effect of EBRT plus ADT supports its use on a routine basis for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The results with long-term ADT are much more convincing than short-term ADT, and, as a consequence, 2 to 3 years are recommended.",
author = "Alan Pollack and Kuban, {Deborah A.} and Zagars, {Gunar K.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01564-9",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "22--31",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3 SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer

AU - Pollack, Alan

AU - Kuban, Deborah A.

AU - Zagars, Gunar K.

PY - 2002/9/1

Y1 - 2002/9/1

N2 - A number of retrospective and randomized trials have studied the effect of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on locally advanced/high-risk prostate cancer. Of 6 published randomized trials that have compared EBRT plus ADT with EBRT alone, 2 have shown a highly significant overall survival benefit for EBRT plus ADT, and 2 have demonstrated an advantage for the combination in patient subsets based on Gleason score. The results from the positive trials of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT alone, as well as a recent report of a comparison of short-term (6 months) ADT plus EBRT versus long-term (>6 months) ADT plus EBRT, suggest that short-term ADT plus EBRT preferentially lengthens the survival of patients with Gleason score 2 to 6 disease, whereas for Gleason score 8 to 10 disease, prolongation of survival requires long-term ADT plus EBRT. These data are far from clear-cut because there are factors that confound interpretation of the subgroup analyses. Retrospective data on patients with positive lymph node status support the assertion that EBRT plus ADT prolongs survival to a greater degree than either treatment given individually. The weight of the available investigations on the survival effect of EBRT plus ADT supports its use on a routine basis for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The results with long-term ADT are much more convincing than short-term ADT, and, as a consequence, 2 to 3 years are recommended.

AB - A number of retrospective and randomized trials have studied the effect of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on locally advanced/high-risk prostate cancer. Of 6 published randomized trials that have compared EBRT plus ADT with EBRT alone, 2 have shown a highly significant overall survival benefit for EBRT plus ADT, and 2 have demonstrated an advantage for the combination in patient subsets based on Gleason score. The results from the positive trials of EBRT plus ADT versus EBRT alone, as well as a recent report of a comparison of short-term (6 months) ADT plus EBRT versus long-term (>6 months) ADT plus EBRT, suggest that short-term ADT plus EBRT preferentially lengthens the survival of patients with Gleason score 2 to 6 disease, whereas for Gleason score 8 to 10 disease, prolongation of survival requires long-term ADT plus EBRT. These data are far from clear-cut because there are factors that confound interpretation of the subgroup analyses. Retrospective data on patients with positive lymph node status support the assertion that EBRT plus ADT prolongs survival to a greater degree than either treatment given individually. The weight of the available investigations on the survival effect of EBRT plus ADT supports its use on a routine basis for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The results with long-term ADT are much more convincing than short-term ADT, and, as a consequence, 2 to 3 years are recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18644378333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18644378333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01564-9

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01564-9

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 22

EP - 31

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3 SUPPL. 1

ER -