Immune responses to low back pain risk factors

Riley E. Splittstoesser, William S. Marras, Thomas Best

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Investigate effects of interactions between biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors on the body's immune inflammatory responses. Background: Current theories for low back pain causation do not fully account for the body's response to tissue loading and tissue trauma. Methods: Two groups possessing a preference for the sensor or intuitor personality trait performed repetitive lifting combined with high or low mental workload on separate occasions. Spinal loading was assessed using an EMG-assisted subject-specific biomechanical model and immune markers were collected before and after exposure. Results: Mental workload was associated with a small decrease in AP shear. Both conditions were characterized by a regulated time-dependent immune response making use of markers of inflammation, tissue trauma and muscle damage. Intuitors' creatine kinase levels were increased following low mental workload compared to that observed in Sensors with the opposite trend occurring for high mental workload. Conclusions: A temporally regulated immune response to lifting combined with mental workload exists. This response is influenced by personality and mental workload.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6016-6023
Number of pages8
JournalWork
Volume41
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 23 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Workload
Personality
Wounds and Injuries
Creatine Kinase
Causality
Biomarkers
Inflammation
Muscles

Keywords

  • Causation
  • Inflammation
  • Low Back Pain
  • Risk Factor Interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Splittstoesser, R. E., Marras, W. S., & Best, T. (2012). Immune responses to low back pain risk factors. Work, 41(SUPPL.1), 6016-6023. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016

Immune responses to low back pain risk factors. / Splittstoesser, Riley E.; Marras, William S.; Best, Thomas.

In: Work, Vol. 41, No. SUPPL.1, 23.04.2012, p. 6016-6023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Splittstoesser, RE, Marras, WS & Best, T 2012, 'Immune responses to low back pain risk factors', Work, vol. 41, no. SUPPL.1, pp. 6016-6023. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016
Splittstoesser RE, Marras WS, Best T. Immune responses to low back pain risk factors. Work. 2012 Apr 23;41(SUPPL.1):6016-6023. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016
Splittstoesser, Riley E. ; Marras, William S. ; Best, Thomas. / Immune responses to low back pain risk factors. In: Work. 2012 ; Vol. 41, No. SUPPL.1. pp. 6016-6023.
@article{57c6e23d235446c8b4d5214e8ee08fa0,
title = "Immune responses to low back pain risk factors",
abstract = "Objective: Investigate effects of interactions between biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors on the body's immune inflammatory responses. Background: Current theories for low back pain causation do not fully account for the body's response to tissue loading and tissue trauma. Methods: Two groups possessing a preference for the sensor or intuitor personality trait performed repetitive lifting combined with high or low mental workload on separate occasions. Spinal loading was assessed using an EMG-assisted subject-specific biomechanical model and immune markers were collected before and after exposure. Results: Mental workload was associated with a small decrease in AP shear. Both conditions were characterized by a regulated time-dependent immune response making use of markers of inflammation, tissue trauma and muscle damage. Intuitors' creatine kinase levels were increased following low mental workload compared to that observed in Sensors with the opposite trend occurring for high mental workload. Conclusions: A temporally regulated immune response to lifting combined with mental workload exists. This response is influenced by personality and mental workload.",
keywords = "Causation, Inflammation, Low Back Pain, Risk Factor Interactions",
author = "Splittstoesser, {Riley E.} and Marras, {William S.} and Thomas Best",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "6016--6023",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immune responses to low back pain risk factors

AU - Splittstoesser, Riley E.

AU - Marras, William S.

AU - Best, Thomas

PY - 2012/4/23

Y1 - 2012/4/23

N2 - Objective: Investigate effects of interactions between biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors on the body's immune inflammatory responses. Background: Current theories for low back pain causation do not fully account for the body's response to tissue loading and tissue trauma. Methods: Two groups possessing a preference for the sensor or intuitor personality trait performed repetitive lifting combined with high or low mental workload on separate occasions. Spinal loading was assessed using an EMG-assisted subject-specific biomechanical model and immune markers were collected before and after exposure. Results: Mental workload was associated with a small decrease in AP shear. Both conditions were characterized by a regulated time-dependent immune response making use of markers of inflammation, tissue trauma and muscle damage. Intuitors' creatine kinase levels were increased following low mental workload compared to that observed in Sensors with the opposite trend occurring for high mental workload. Conclusions: A temporally regulated immune response to lifting combined with mental workload exists. This response is influenced by personality and mental workload.

AB - Objective: Investigate effects of interactions between biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors on the body's immune inflammatory responses. Background: Current theories for low back pain causation do not fully account for the body's response to tissue loading and tissue trauma. Methods: Two groups possessing a preference for the sensor or intuitor personality trait performed repetitive lifting combined with high or low mental workload on separate occasions. Spinal loading was assessed using an EMG-assisted subject-specific biomechanical model and immune markers were collected before and after exposure. Results: Mental workload was associated with a small decrease in AP shear. Both conditions were characterized by a regulated time-dependent immune response making use of markers of inflammation, tissue trauma and muscle damage. Intuitors' creatine kinase levels were increased following low mental workload compared to that observed in Sensors with the opposite trend occurring for high mental workload. Conclusions: A temporally regulated immune response to lifting combined with mental workload exists. This response is influenced by personality and mental workload.

KW - Causation

KW - Inflammation

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Risk Factor Interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859850956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859850956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016

DO - 10.3233/WOR-2012-1053-6016

M3 - Article

C2 - 22317743

AN - SCOPUS:84859850956

VL - 41

SP - 6016

EP - 6023

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -