Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts

Taj M. Kattapuram, Deepak K. Ozhathil, Francis J. Hornicek, Mark C. Gebhardt, Henry J. Mankin, Andrew Rosenberg, Susan V. Kattapuram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the imaging features of non-neoplastic masses suspected of being tumor recurrences adjacent to allografts. The allografts were utilized for the treatment of various musculoskeletal tumors. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 56 patients who were suspected of having recurrent tumors following surgical resection and allograft replacement treatment for a variety of musculoskeletal neoplasms. The imaging modalities included radiographs, CT, and MRI. Results: There were 47 cases of recurrent tumors. All tumor recurrences were in the soft tissues of the surgical bed (41 patients), or in the native bone adjacent to the host/allograft junction (6 patients). None of the recurrences originated in the allografts. Nine patients suspected of having recurrences were discovered to have non-neoplastic masses. Five of these were very closely related to the allograft, wrapping around parts of the allograft, and the other 4 were in the surgical bed, 2 of which were abscesses and two were seromas. Conclusion: Most masses arising in the vicinity of allografts implanted following resection of musculoskeletal tumors represent recurrent neoplasms. A minority are reactive processes or abscesses or fluid collections. These 'pseudoneoplasms,' specifically those closely related to the allografts, have specific imaging characteristics that help distinguish them from recurrent tumors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747-753
Number of pages7
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Allografts
Neoplasms
Recurrence
Abscess
Seroma
Diagnostic Imaging
Medical Records
Bone and Bones
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Allografts
  • Imaging
  • Musculoskeletal tumors
  • Pseudoneoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Kattapuram, T. M., Ozhathil, D. K., Hornicek, F. J., Gebhardt, M. C., Mankin, H. J., Rosenberg, A., & Kattapuram, S. V. (2007). Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts. Skeletal Radiology, 36(8), 747-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8

Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts. / Kattapuram, Taj M.; Ozhathil, Deepak K.; Hornicek, Francis J.; Gebhardt, Mark C.; Mankin, Henry J.; Rosenberg, Andrew; Kattapuram, Susan V.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 01.08.2007, p. 747-753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kattapuram, TM, Ozhathil, DK, Hornicek, FJ, Gebhardt, MC, Mankin, HJ, Rosenberg, A & Kattapuram, SV 2007, 'Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts', Skeletal Radiology, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 747-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8
Kattapuram TM, Ozhathil DK, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ, Rosenberg A et al. Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts. Skeletal Radiology. 2007 Aug 1;36(8):747-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8
Kattapuram, Taj M. ; Ozhathil, Deepak K. ; Hornicek, Francis J. ; Gebhardt, Mark C. ; Mankin, Henry J. ; Rosenberg, Andrew ; Kattapuram, Susan V. / Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2007 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 747-753.
@article{5803008de1354c229611cbe7f49ce594,
title = "Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the imaging features of non-neoplastic masses suspected of being tumor recurrences adjacent to allografts. The allografts were utilized for the treatment of various musculoskeletal tumors. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 56 patients who were suspected of having recurrent tumors following surgical resection and allograft replacement treatment for a variety of musculoskeletal neoplasms. The imaging modalities included radiographs, CT, and MRI. Results: There were 47 cases of recurrent tumors. All tumor recurrences were in the soft tissues of the surgical bed (41 patients), or in the native bone adjacent to the host/allograft junction (6 patients). None of the recurrences originated in the allografts. Nine patients suspected of having recurrences were discovered to have non-neoplastic masses. Five of these were very closely related to the allograft, wrapping around parts of the allograft, and the other 4 were in the surgical bed, 2 of which were abscesses and two were seromas. Conclusion: Most masses arising in the vicinity of allografts implanted following resection of musculoskeletal tumors represent recurrent neoplasms. A minority are reactive processes or abscesses or fluid collections. These 'pseudoneoplasms,' specifically those closely related to the allografts, have specific imaging characteristics that help distinguish them from recurrent tumors.",
keywords = "Allografts, Imaging, Musculoskeletal tumors, Pseudoneoplasms",
author = "Kattapuram, {Taj M.} and Ozhathil, {Deepak K.} and Hornicek, {Francis J.} and Gebhardt, {Mark C.} and Mankin, {Henry J.} and Andrew Rosenberg and Kattapuram, {Susan V.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "747--753",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts

AU - Kattapuram, Taj M.

AU - Ozhathil, Deepak K.

AU - Hornicek, Francis J.

AU - Gebhardt, Mark C.

AU - Mankin, Henry J.

AU - Rosenberg, Andrew

AU - Kattapuram, Susan V.

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the imaging features of non-neoplastic masses suspected of being tumor recurrences adjacent to allografts. The allografts were utilized for the treatment of various musculoskeletal tumors. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 56 patients who were suspected of having recurrent tumors following surgical resection and allograft replacement treatment for a variety of musculoskeletal neoplasms. The imaging modalities included radiographs, CT, and MRI. Results: There were 47 cases of recurrent tumors. All tumor recurrences were in the soft tissues of the surgical bed (41 patients), or in the native bone adjacent to the host/allograft junction (6 patients). None of the recurrences originated in the allografts. Nine patients suspected of having recurrences were discovered to have non-neoplastic masses. Five of these were very closely related to the allograft, wrapping around parts of the allograft, and the other 4 were in the surgical bed, 2 of which were abscesses and two were seromas. Conclusion: Most masses arising in the vicinity of allografts implanted following resection of musculoskeletal tumors represent recurrent neoplasms. A minority are reactive processes or abscesses or fluid collections. These 'pseudoneoplasms,' specifically those closely related to the allografts, have specific imaging characteristics that help distinguish them from recurrent tumors.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the imaging features of non-neoplastic masses suspected of being tumor recurrences adjacent to allografts. The allografts were utilized for the treatment of various musculoskeletal tumors. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 56 patients who were suspected of having recurrent tumors following surgical resection and allograft replacement treatment for a variety of musculoskeletal neoplasms. The imaging modalities included radiographs, CT, and MRI. Results: There were 47 cases of recurrent tumors. All tumor recurrences were in the soft tissues of the surgical bed (41 patients), or in the native bone adjacent to the host/allograft junction (6 patients). None of the recurrences originated in the allografts. Nine patients suspected of having recurrences were discovered to have non-neoplastic masses. Five of these were very closely related to the allograft, wrapping around parts of the allograft, and the other 4 were in the surgical bed, 2 of which were abscesses and two were seromas. Conclusion: Most masses arising in the vicinity of allografts implanted following resection of musculoskeletal tumors represent recurrent neoplasms. A minority are reactive processes or abscesses or fluid collections. These 'pseudoneoplasms,' specifically those closely related to the allografts, have specific imaging characteristics that help distinguish them from recurrent tumors.

KW - Allografts

KW - Imaging

KW - Musculoskeletal tumors

KW - Pseudoneoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347351417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347351417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8

DO - 10.1007/s00256-007-0292-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 17415562

AN - SCOPUS:34347351417

VL - 36

SP - 747

EP - 753

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 8

ER -