Identity status measurement across contexts: Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults

Seth J Schwartz, Lena Adamson, Laura Ferrer-Wreder, Frank R. Dillon, Steven L. Berman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted this study to examine measurement equivalence and mean differences in identity status across 3 ethnic/cultural contexts: White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish. We used the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status II (EOM-EIS-II; Bennion & Adams, 1986), a commonly used instrument in the identity status literature. We conducted analyses to ascertain the extent to which the EOM-EIS-II functioned equivalently in 3 ethnically/culturally different samples. The internal structure of the measure was consistent across contexts. When we statistically controlled effects of age and gender, mean differences tended to be largely cross-cultural at the observed level of analysis but to be both cross-ethnic and cross-cultural at the latent level of analysis. This divergence in findings was found despite the limited age range represented in each of the samples. We therefore concluded that measurement error may have played a role in these differences and that data gathered using the EOM-EIS-II should be analyzed using latent variable methods. We discuss results in terms of using the EOM-EIS-II with diverse populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-76
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Ego
Hispanic Americans
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Identity status measurement across contexts : Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults. / Schwartz, Seth J; Adamson, Lena; Ferrer-Wreder, Laura; Dillon, Frank R.; Berman, Steven L.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 86, No. 1, 01.02.2006, p. 61-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29d785cfbf7641629992f86bcd1e5290,
title = "Identity status measurement across contexts: Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults",
abstract = "We conducted this study to examine measurement equivalence and mean differences in identity status across 3 ethnic/cultural contexts: White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish. We used the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status II (EOM-EIS-II; Bennion & Adams, 1986), a commonly used instrument in the identity status literature. We conducted analyses to ascertain the extent to which the EOM-EIS-II functioned equivalently in 3 ethnically/culturally different samples. The internal structure of the measure was consistent across contexts. When we statistically controlled effects of age and gender, mean differences tended to be largely cross-cultural at the observed level of analysis but to be both cross-ethnic and cross-cultural at the latent level of analysis. This divergence in findings was found despite the limited age range represented in each of the samples. We therefore concluded that measurement error may have played a role in these differences and that data gathered using the EOM-EIS-II should be analyzed using latent variable methods. We discuss results in terms of using the EOM-EIS-II with diverse populations.",
author = "Schwartz, {Seth J} and Lena Adamson and Laura Ferrer-Wreder and Dillon, {Frank R.} and Berman, {Steven L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_08",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "61--76",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identity status measurement across contexts

T2 - Variations in measurement structure and mean levels among White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish emerging adults

AU - Schwartz, Seth J

AU - Adamson, Lena

AU - Ferrer-Wreder, Laura

AU - Dillon, Frank R.

AU - Berman, Steven L.

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - We conducted this study to examine measurement equivalence and mean differences in identity status across 3 ethnic/cultural contexts: White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish. We used the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status II (EOM-EIS-II; Bennion & Adams, 1986), a commonly used instrument in the identity status literature. We conducted analyses to ascertain the extent to which the EOM-EIS-II functioned equivalently in 3 ethnically/culturally different samples. The internal structure of the measure was consistent across contexts. When we statistically controlled effects of age and gender, mean differences tended to be largely cross-cultural at the observed level of analysis but to be both cross-ethnic and cross-cultural at the latent level of analysis. This divergence in findings was found despite the limited age range represented in each of the samples. We therefore concluded that measurement error may have played a role in these differences and that data gathered using the EOM-EIS-II should be analyzed using latent variable methods. We discuss results in terms of using the EOM-EIS-II with diverse populations.

AB - We conducted this study to examine measurement equivalence and mean differences in identity status across 3 ethnic/cultural contexts: White American, Hispanic American, and Swedish. We used the Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status II (EOM-EIS-II; Bennion & Adams, 1986), a commonly used instrument in the identity status literature. We conducted analyses to ascertain the extent to which the EOM-EIS-II functioned equivalently in 3 ethnically/culturally different samples. The internal structure of the measure was consistent across contexts. When we statistically controlled effects of age and gender, mean differences tended to be largely cross-cultural at the observed level of analysis but to be both cross-ethnic and cross-cultural at the latent level of analysis. This divergence in findings was found despite the limited age range represented in each of the samples. We therefore concluded that measurement error may have played a role in these differences and that data gathered using the EOM-EIS-II should be analyzed using latent variable methods. We discuss results in terms of using the EOM-EIS-II with diverse populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32444435346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32444435346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_08

DO - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_08

M3 - Article

C2 - 16436021

AN - SCOPUS:32444435346

VL - 86

SP - 61

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 1

ER -