Identity and difference: Complicating gender in archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From its inception, the archaeology of gender was entwined with feminism. Engagement has engendered reconstructions of complex, diverse peoples and practices that are more equitable, relevant, and sound. Yet, for many archaeologists, the connection with feminist perspectives has frayed in recent years. Their studies of gender articulate dated ideas about women and epistemological frames that highlight duality and universality. Examinations of labor divisions typify shortcomings. To advance gender's study and archaeology, practitioners need to consider several concerns about identity and difference emerging from third-wave feminism. Gender is envisioned as intersection. Bioarchaeology, especially, will benefit from feminist approaches that reflect critically and regard gender in nonnormative and multiscalar terms. To this end, resistance to feminism must fade. Opposition stems from its imagined relationship with postmodernism, but conflation misconstrues feminism's sociopolitical commitment to emancipatory change. For their part, archaeologists can utilize feminist perspectives to diversify the field, explore difference, and tackle archaeological issues with sociopolitical resonance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-81
Number of pages17
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

feminism
archaeology
gender-specific factors
gender
gender studies
postmodernism
division of labor
opposition
reconstruction
commitment
examination
Archaeology
Gender Differences
Feminism
Archaeologists

Keywords

  • Bioarchaeology
  • Feminism
  • Postmodernism
  • Race
  • Sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Identity and difference : Complicating gender in archaeology. / Geller, Pamela.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 38, 10.2009, p. 65-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c66f40a17d443da9c33ee7e24d35699,
title = "Identity and difference: Complicating gender in archaeology",
abstract = "From its inception, the archaeology of gender was entwined with feminism. Engagement has engendered reconstructions of complex, diverse peoples and practices that are more equitable, relevant, and sound. Yet, for many archaeologists, the connection with feminist perspectives has frayed in recent years. Their studies of gender articulate dated ideas about women and epistemological frames that highlight duality and universality. Examinations of labor divisions typify shortcomings. To advance gender's study and archaeology, practitioners need to consider several concerns about identity and difference emerging from third-wave feminism. Gender is envisioned as intersection. Bioarchaeology, especially, will benefit from feminist approaches that reflect critically and regard gender in nonnormative and multiscalar terms. To this end, resistance to feminism must fade. Opposition stems from its imagined relationship with postmodernism, but conflation misconstrues feminism's sociopolitical commitment to emancipatory change. For their part, archaeologists can utilize feminist perspectives to diversify the field, explore difference, and tackle archaeological issues with sociopolitical resonance.",
keywords = "Bioarchaeology, Feminism, Postmodernism, Race, Sexuality",
author = "Pamela Geller",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "65--81",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identity and difference

T2 - Complicating gender in archaeology

AU - Geller, Pamela

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - From its inception, the archaeology of gender was entwined with feminism. Engagement has engendered reconstructions of complex, diverse peoples and practices that are more equitable, relevant, and sound. Yet, for many archaeologists, the connection with feminist perspectives has frayed in recent years. Their studies of gender articulate dated ideas about women and epistemological frames that highlight duality and universality. Examinations of labor divisions typify shortcomings. To advance gender's study and archaeology, practitioners need to consider several concerns about identity and difference emerging from third-wave feminism. Gender is envisioned as intersection. Bioarchaeology, especially, will benefit from feminist approaches that reflect critically and regard gender in nonnormative and multiscalar terms. To this end, resistance to feminism must fade. Opposition stems from its imagined relationship with postmodernism, but conflation misconstrues feminism's sociopolitical commitment to emancipatory change. For their part, archaeologists can utilize feminist perspectives to diversify the field, explore difference, and tackle archaeological issues with sociopolitical resonance.

AB - From its inception, the archaeology of gender was entwined with feminism. Engagement has engendered reconstructions of complex, diverse peoples and practices that are more equitable, relevant, and sound. Yet, for many archaeologists, the connection with feminist perspectives has frayed in recent years. Their studies of gender articulate dated ideas about women and epistemological frames that highlight duality and universality. Examinations of labor divisions typify shortcomings. To advance gender's study and archaeology, practitioners need to consider several concerns about identity and difference emerging from third-wave feminism. Gender is envisioned as intersection. Bioarchaeology, especially, will benefit from feminist approaches that reflect critically and regard gender in nonnormative and multiscalar terms. To this end, resistance to feminism must fade. Opposition stems from its imagined relationship with postmodernism, but conflation misconstrues feminism's sociopolitical commitment to emancipatory change. For their part, archaeologists can utilize feminist perspectives to diversify the field, explore difference, and tackle archaeological issues with sociopolitical resonance.

KW - Bioarchaeology

KW - Feminism

KW - Postmodernism

KW - Race

KW - Sexuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350454000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350454000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414

DO - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350454000

VL - 38

SP - 65

EP - 81

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

ER -