Identification of the Epidural Space Using Pressure Measurement With the Compuflo Injection Pump - A Pilot Study

Oscar Ghelber, Ralf E Gebhard, Sejal Vora, Carin A. Hagberg, Peter Szmuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: While epidural anesthesia (EA) is frequently used, success rate varies and complications associated with incorrect needle placement can occur. Different methods of objective identification of the epidural space (ES) have been suggested, without receiving widespread popularity. This prospective pilot study evaluated continuous pressure measurement during low speed injection with a computerized injection pump to objectively identify the ES. Methods: While EA was performed using a conventional loss of resistance technique in 20 consecutive patients, the injection pump technology was used to obtain pressure readings from the supraspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and the ES. In the next 20 patients, the epidural space was solely identified with the computerized injection pump. Results: Pressure reading obtained during the first part of the study revealed significant differences between the ES vs. the supraspinous ligament, and the ES vs. the ligamentum flavum (8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-11 vs 79 mm Hg, 95% CI 74-83 and 92 mm Hg, 95% CI 83-102, respectively) (P < .001). In the second part of the study, the injection pump allowed for successful identification of the ES and performance of EA in all 20 patients. Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that a computerized injection pump can be used to identify the epidural space and can serve as a base for further comparative research to determine whether this technology can increase the success rate of EA or lower the incidence of side effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-352
Number of pages7
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Epidural Space
Pressure
Injections
Epidural Anesthesia
Ligamentum Flavum
Confidence Intervals
Ligaments
Reading
Technology
Needles
Prospective Studies
Incidence

Keywords

  • Epidural anesthesia
  • Epidural space pressure
  • Labor analgesia
  • Success rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Identification of the Epidural Space Using Pressure Measurement With the Compuflo Injection Pump - A Pilot Study. / Ghelber, Oscar; Gebhard, Ralf E; Vora, Sejal; Hagberg, Carin A.; Szmuk, Peter.

In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.07.2008, p. 346-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5afa38d451234201b92f6eaf2bbeb16f,
title = "Identification of the Epidural Space Using Pressure Measurement With the Compuflo Injection Pump - A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: While epidural anesthesia (EA) is frequently used, success rate varies and complications associated with incorrect needle placement can occur. Different methods of objective identification of the epidural space (ES) have been suggested, without receiving widespread popularity. This prospective pilot study evaluated continuous pressure measurement during low speed injection with a computerized injection pump to objectively identify the ES. Methods: While EA was performed using a conventional loss of resistance technique in 20 consecutive patients, the injection pump technology was used to obtain pressure readings from the supraspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and the ES. In the next 20 patients, the epidural space was solely identified with the computerized injection pump. Results: Pressure reading obtained during the first part of the study revealed significant differences between the ES vs. the supraspinous ligament, and the ES vs. the ligamentum flavum (8 mm Hg, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 6-11 vs 79 mm Hg, 95{\%} CI 74-83 and 92 mm Hg, 95{\%} CI 83-102, respectively) (P < .001). In the second part of the study, the injection pump allowed for successful identification of the ES and performance of EA in all 20 patients. Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that a computerized injection pump can be used to identify the epidural space and can serve as a base for further comparative research to determine whether this technology can increase the success rate of EA or lower the incidence of side effects.",
keywords = "Epidural anesthesia, Epidural space pressure, Labor analgesia, Success rate",
author = "Oscar Ghelber and Gebhard, {Ralf E} and Sejal Vora and Hagberg, {Carin A.} and Peter Szmuk",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "346--352",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of the Epidural Space Using Pressure Measurement With the Compuflo Injection Pump - A Pilot Study

AU - Ghelber, Oscar

AU - Gebhard, Ralf E

AU - Vora, Sejal

AU - Hagberg, Carin A.

AU - Szmuk, Peter

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: While epidural anesthesia (EA) is frequently used, success rate varies and complications associated with incorrect needle placement can occur. Different methods of objective identification of the epidural space (ES) have been suggested, without receiving widespread popularity. This prospective pilot study evaluated continuous pressure measurement during low speed injection with a computerized injection pump to objectively identify the ES. Methods: While EA was performed using a conventional loss of resistance technique in 20 consecutive patients, the injection pump technology was used to obtain pressure readings from the supraspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and the ES. In the next 20 patients, the epidural space was solely identified with the computerized injection pump. Results: Pressure reading obtained during the first part of the study revealed significant differences between the ES vs. the supraspinous ligament, and the ES vs. the ligamentum flavum (8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-11 vs 79 mm Hg, 95% CI 74-83 and 92 mm Hg, 95% CI 83-102, respectively) (P < .001). In the second part of the study, the injection pump allowed for successful identification of the ES and performance of EA in all 20 patients. Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that a computerized injection pump can be used to identify the epidural space and can serve as a base for further comparative research to determine whether this technology can increase the success rate of EA or lower the incidence of side effects.

AB - Background and Objectives: While epidural anesthesia (EA) is frequently used, success rate varies and complications associated with incorrect needle placement can occur. Different methods of objective identification of the epidural space (ES) have been suggested, without receiving widespread popularity. This prospective pilot study evaluated continuous pressure measurement during low speed injection with a computerized injection pump to objectively identify the ES. Methods: While EA was performed using a conventional loss of resistance technique in 20 consecutive patients, the injection pump technology was used to obtain pressure readings from the supraspinous ligament, the ligamentum flavum, and the ES. In the next 20 patients, the epidural space was solely identified with the computerized injection pump. Results: Pressure reading obtained during the first part of the study revealed significant differences between the ES vs. the supraspinous ligament, and the ES vs. the ligamentum flavum (8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-11 vs 79 mm Hg, 95% CI 74-83 and 92 mm Hg, 95% CI 83-102, respectively) (P < .001). In the second part of the study, the injection pump allowed for successful identification of the ES and performance of EA in all 20 patients. Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that a computerized injection pump can be used to identify the epidural space and can serve as a base for further comparative research to determine whether this technology can increase the success rate of EA or lower the incidence of side effects.

KW - Epidural anesthesia

KW - Epidural space pressure

KW - Labor analgesia

KW - Success rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48149090393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48149090393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18675746

AN - SCOPUS:48149090393

VL - 33

SP - 346

EP - 352

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

IS - 4

ER -