I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form

Harvey Siegel

doi:10.1080/00201748008601893

I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form

Harvey Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gerald Doppelt’s recent ‘Kuhn’s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense’ (Inquiry, Vol. 21 [1978], pp 33-86) offers a reconstruction of Thomas Kuhn’s views concerning theory choice in science in which Kuhn’s ‘incommensurability thesis’, and his epistemological relativism, are defended. It is argued that Doppelt’s reconstruction fails to provide an adequate defense, and that both Kuhn’s incommensurability thesis, and his epistemological relativism, as reconstructed by Doppelt, remain philosophically unacceptable.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	107-123
Number of pages	17
Journal	Inquiry (United Kingdom)
Volume	23
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748008601893
State	Published - Mar 1980
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy
Health Policy

Access to Document

10.1080/00201748008601893

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{42b38c543ac54e84837b43ba16a42726,

title = "I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form",

abstract = "Gerald Doppelt{\textquoteright}s recent {\textquoteleft}Kuhn{\textquoteright}s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense{\textquoteright} (Inquiry, Vol. 21 [1978], pp 33-86) offers a reconstruction of Thomas Kuhn{\textquoteright}s views concerning theory choice in science in which Kuhn{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}incommensurability thesis{\textquoteright}, and his epistemological relativism, are defended. It is argued that Doppelt{\textquoteright}s reconstruction fails to provide an adequate defense, and that both Kuhn{\textquoteright}s incommensurability thesis, and his epistemological relativism, as reconstructed by Doppelt, remain philosophically unacceptable.",

author = "Harvey Siegel",

year = "1980",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1080/00201748008601893",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "23",

pages = "107--123",

journal = "Inquiry",

issn = "0020-174X",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form

AU - Siegel, Harvey

PY - 1980/3

Y1 - 1980/3

N2 - Gerald Doppelt’s recent ‘Kuhn’s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense’ (Inquiry, Vol. 21 [1978], pp 33-86) offers a reconstruction of Thomas Kuhn’s views concerning theory choice in science in which Kuhn’s ‘incommensurability thesis’, and his epistemological relativism, are defended. It is argued that Doppelt’s reconstruction fails to provide an adequate defense, and that both Kuhn’s incommensurability thesis, and his epistemological relativism, as reconstructed by Doppelt, remain philosophically unacceptable.

AB - Gerald Doppelt’s recent ‘Kuhn’s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense’ (Inquiry, Vol. 21 [1978], pp 33-86) offers a reconstruction of Thomas Kuhn’s views concerning theory choice in science in which Kuhn’s ‘incommensurability thesis’, and his epistemological relativism, are defended. It is argued that Doppelt’s reconstruction fails to provide an adequate defense, and that both Kuhn’s incommensurability thesis, and his epistemological relativism, as reconstructed by Doppelt, remain philosophically unacceptable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925923021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925923021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00201748008601893

DO - 10.1080/00201748008601893

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925923021

VL - 23

SP - 107

EP - 123

JO - Inquiry

JF - Inquiry

SN - 0020-174X

IS - 1

ER -

I. Epistemological Relativism in its Latest Form

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this