Hydraulic analysis and design of pipe culverts: Usgs versus fhwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Culvert performance curves relate the flow through a culvert to the headwater and tailwater elevations. These curves are calculated differently by the USGS and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), leading to the possibility of significant discrepancies in predicted culvert performance under some flow conditions. The FHWA methodology generally leads to conservative culvert designs relative to designs based on the USGS equations, and the degree of conservatism is the focus of this paper. The largest discrepancies in estimated headwater elevations for given flow rates occur under high-headwater and low-tailwater conditions, and these discrepancies are due in large part to the uncertainty in whether Type 5 or 6 flow will exist. The results of this paper show that for horizontal culverts with square-edge entrances and smooth surfaces the overestimation in the headwater depth can range from 9-45% for headwater depths in the range of 1.5-3 culvert diameters, with lesser overestimations of 7-30% in cases of rounded entrances. The amount of overestimation will be less for high-roughness culverts. In cases for which the culvert is not horizontal, the overestimation, if any, will depend on the slope of the culvert, length-to-diameter ratio, and roughness

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)886-893
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume139
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2013

Fingerprint

Culverts
Highway administration
culvert
pipe
Surface roughness
Pipe
Hydraulics
headwater
hydraulics
Flow rate
roughness
road
analysis
methodology
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Culvert
  • Design
  • Flow
  • Performance curve
  • Regime

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Hydraulic analysis and design of pipe culverts : Usgs versus fhwa. / Chin, David A.

In: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 8, 13.08.2013, p. 886-893.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6f55d3744a0429ea98f994dcd885d4d,
title = "Hydraulic analysis and design of pipe culverts: Usgs versus fhwa",
abstract = "Culvert performance curves relate the flow through a culvert to the headwater and tailwater elevations. These curves are calculated differently by the USGS and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), leading to the possibility of significant discrepancies in predicted culvert performance under some flow conditions. The FHWA methodology generally leads to conservative culvert designs relative to designs based on the USGS equations, and the degree of conservatism is the focus of this paper. The largest discrepancies in estimated headwater elevations for given flow rates occur under high-headwater and low-tailwater conditions, and these discrepancies are due in large part to the uncertainty in whether Type 5 or 6 flow will exist. The results of this paper show that for horizontal culverts with square-edge entrances and smooth surfaces the overestimation in the headwater depth can range from 9-45{\%} for headwater depths in the range of 1.5-3 culvert diameters, with lesser overestimations of 7-30{\%} in cases of rounded entrances. The amount of overestimation will be less for high-roughness culverts. In cases for which the culvert is not horizontal, the overestimation, if any, will depend on the slope of the culvert, length-to-diameter ratio, and roughness",
keywords = "Culvert, Design, Flow, Performance curve, Regime",
author = "Chin, {David A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000748",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "886--893",
journal = "Journal of Hydraulic Engineering",
issn = "0733-9429",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydraulic analysis and design of pipe culverts

T2 - Usgs versus fhwa

AU - Chin, David A.

PY - 2013/8/13

Y1 - 2013/8/13

N2 - Culvert performance curves relate the flow through a culvert to the headwater and tailwater elevations. These curves are calculated differently by the USGS and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), leading to the possibility of significant discrepancies in predicted culvert performance under some flow conditions. The FHWA methodology generally leads to conservative culvert designs relative to designs based on the USGS equations, and the degree of conservatism is the focus of this paper. The largest discrepancies in estimated headwater elevations for given flow rates occur under high-headwater and low-tailwater conditions, and these discrepancies are due in large part to the uncertainty in whether Type 5 or 6 flow will exist. The results of this paper show that for horizontal culverts with square-edge entrances and smooth surfaces the overestimation in the headwater depth can range from 9-45% for headwater depths in the range of 1.5-3 culvert diameters, with lesser overestimations of 7-30% in cases of rounded entrances. The amount of overestimation will be less for high-roughness culverts. In cases for which the culvert is not horizontal, the overestimation, if any, will depend on the slope of the culvert, length-to-diameter ratio, and roughness

AB - Culvert performance curves relate the flow through a culvert to the headwater and tailwater elevations. These curves are calculated differently by the USGS and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), leading to the possibility of significant discrepancies in predicted culvert performance under some flow conditions. The FHWA methodology generally leads to conservative culvert designs relative to designs based on the USGS equations, and the degree of conservatism is the focus of this paper. The largest discrepancies in estimated headwater elevations for given flow rates occur under high-headwater and low-tailwater conditions, and these discrepancies are due in large part to the uncertainty in whether Type 5 or 6 flow will exist. The results of this paper show that for horizontal culverts with square-edge entrances and smooth surfaces the overestimation in the headwater depth can range from 9-45% for headwater depths in the range of 1.5-3 culvert diameters, with lesser overestimations of 7-30% in cases of rounded entrances. The amount of overestimation will be less for high-roughness culverts. In cases for which the culvert is not horizontal, the overestimation, if any, will depend on the slope of the culvert, length-to-diameter ratio, and roughness

KW - Culvert

KW - Design

KW - Flow

KW - Performance curve

KW - Regime

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881230412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881230412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000748

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000748

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881230412

VL - 139

SP - 886

EP - 893

JO - Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

JF - Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

SN - 0733-9429

IS - 8

ER -