Husserl on Essences

Amie Thomasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


The common thought that Husserl was committed to a Platonist ontology of essences, and to a mysterious epistemology that holds that we can 'intuit' these essences, has contributed substantially to his work being dismissed and marginalized in analytic philosophy. This paper aims to show that it is misguided to dismiss Husserl on these grounds. First, the author aims to explicate Husserl's views about essences and how we can know them, in ways that make clear that he is not committed to a traditional Platonism, or a mystical epistemology. Second, the author argues that Husserl's approach was an important source for Carnap in "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology", where Carnap tried to overcome the empiricists' qualms about referring to abstracta. Finally, the author will argue that Husserl's approach can be reconstructed in contemporary analytic terms by appeal to the idea of pleonastic transformations. By seeing both Husserl's views and their influences on later analytic work more clearly, the hope is to build bridges and make clear that the approach is of lasting value and interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-459
Number of pages24
JournalGrazer Philosophische Studien
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • Carnap
  • David Woodruff Smith
  • essence
  • Husserl
  • Platonism
  • pleonastic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Husserl on Essences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this