How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules?

Elizabeth A Babcock, Alec D. Maccall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A management strategy evaluation (based on five species in the California, USA, nearshore fishery) of control rules that reduce relative fishing effort as a function of the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves (as a measure of depletion) showed that although the control rules allowed effort to increase at first, in the long term, they were effective at maintaining spawning stock biomass and yield for all simulated species, including depleted ones. Scenarios with fish movement, illegal fishing in the reserve, or post-dispersal density dependence in recruitment required higher density ratio targets, such as 60% of mature fish or 80% of all fish, to avoid stock depletion. The effort allowed by multispecies density-ratio control rules depended on the relative weight given to more or less depleted species. High variability in recruitment or in monitoring data caused the allowable effort to fluctuate. Density-ratio control rules have the advantages that they require no historical data, they can be used at local spatial scales, and they adjust to changing environmental conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-359
Number of pages17
JournalCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

marine park
fishery management
fisheries management
fish
fishing effort
density dependence
fishing
spawning
fishery
environmental conditions
fisheries
biomass
environmental factors
monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

@article{14b3f1770b1f4b038c49656b5961782b,
title = "How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules?",
abstract = "A management strategy evaluation (based on five species in the California, USA, nearshore fishery) of control rules that reduce relative fishing effort as a function of the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves (as a measure of depletion) showed that although the control rules allowed effort to increase at first, in the long term, they were effective at maintaining spawning stock biomass and yield for all simulated species, including depleted ones. Scenarios with fish movement, illegal fishing in the reserve, or post-dispersal density dependence in recruitment required higher density ratio targets, such as 60{\%} of mature fish or 80{\%} of all fish, to avoid stock depletion. The effort allowed by multispecies density-ratio control rules depended on the relative weight given to more or less depleted species. High variability in recruitment or in monitoring data caused the allowable effort to fluctuate. Density-ratio control rules have the advantages that they require no historical data, they can be used at local spatial scales, and they adjust to changing environmental conditions.",
author = "Babcock, {Elizabeth A} and Maccall, {Alec D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/F10-146",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "343--359",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences",
issn = "0706-652X",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules?

AU - Babcock, Elizabeth A

AU - Maccall, Alec D.

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - A management strategy evaluation (based on five species in the California, USA, nearshore fishery) of control rules that reduce relative fishing effort as a function of the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves (as a measure of depletion) showed that although the control rules allowed effort to increase at first, in the long term, they were effective at maintaining spawning stock biomass and yield for all simulated species, including depleted ones. Scenarios with fish movement, illegal fishing in the reserve, or post-dispersal density dependence in recruitment required higher density ratio targets, such as 60% of mature fish or 80% of all fish, to avoid stock depletion. The effort allowed by multispecies density-ratio control rules depended on the relative weight given to more or less depleted species. High variability in recruitment or in monitoring data caused the allowable effort to fluctuate. Density-ratio control rules have the advantages that they require no historical data, they can be used at local spatial scales, and they adjust to changing environmental conditions.

AB - A management strategy evaluation (based on five species in the California, USA, nearshore fishery) of control rules that reduce relative fishing effort as a function of the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves (as a measure of depletion) showed that although the control rules allowed effort to increase at first, in the long term, they were effective at maintaining spawning stock biomass and yield for all simulated species, including depleted ones. Scenarios with fish movement, illegal fishing in the reserve, or post-dispersal density dependence in recruitment required higher density ratio targets, such as 60% of mature fish or 80% of all fish, to avoid stock depletion. The effort allowed by multispecies density-ratio control rules depended on the relative weight given to more or less depleted species. High variability in recruitment or in monitoring data caused the allowable effort to fluctuate. Density-ratio control rules have the advantages that they require no historical data, they can be used at local spatial scales, and they adjust to changing environmental conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551668444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551668444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/F10-146

DO - 10.1139/F10-146

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 343

EP - 359

JO - Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

JF - Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

SN - 0706-652X

IS - 2

ER -