How theories represent

Otavio Bueno, Steven French

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An account of scientific representation in terms of partial structures and partial morphisms is further developed. It is argued that the account addresses a variety of difficulties and challenges that have recently been raised against such formal accounts of representation. This allows some useful parallels between representation in science and art to be drawn, particularly with regard to apparently inconsistent representations. These parallels suggest that a unitary account of scientific and artistic representation is possible, and our article can be viewed as laying the groundwork for such an account - although, as we shall acknowledge, significant differences exist between these two forms of representation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)857-894
Number of pages38
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Scientific Representation
Art and Science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • History

Cite this

How theories represent. / Bueno, Otavio; French, Steven.

In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 62, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 857-894.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bueno, Otavio ; French, Steven. / How theories represent. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2011 ; Vol. 62, No. 4. pp. 857-894.
@article{688254de9204469bb71fce7a140322db,
title = "How theories represent",
abstract = "An account of scientific representation in terms of partial structures and partial morphisms is further developed. It is argued that the account addresses a variety of difficulties and challenges that have recently been raised against such formal accounts of representation. This allows some useful parallels between representation in science and art to be drawn, particularly with regard to apparently inconsistent representations. These parallels suggest that a unitary account of scientific and artistic representation is possible, and our article can be viewed as laying the groundwork for such an account - although, as we shall acknowledge, significant differences exist between these two forms of representation.",
author = "Otavio Bueno and Steven French",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/bjps/axr010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "857--894",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How theories represent

AU - Bueno, Otavio

AU - French, Steven

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - An account of scientific representation in terms of partial structures and partial morphisms is further developed. It is argued that the account addresses a variety of difficulties and challenges that have recently been raised against such formal accounts of representation. This allows some useful parallels between representation in science and art to be drawn, particularly with regard to apparently inconsistent representations. These parallels suggest that a unitary account of scientific and artistic representation is possible, and our article can be viewed as laying the groundwork for such an account - although, as we shall acknowledge, significant differences exist between these two forms of representation.

AB - An account of scientific representation in terms of partial structures and partial morphisms is further developed. It is argued that the account addresses a variety of difficulties and challenges that have recently been raised against such formal accounts of representation. This allows some useful parallels between representation in science and art to be drawn, particularly with regard to apparently inconsistent representations. These parallels suggest that a unitary account of scientific and artistic representation is possible, and our article can be viewed as laying the groundwork for such an account - although, as we shall acknowledge, significant differences exist between these two forms of representation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80755143451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80755143451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjps/axr010

DO - 10.1093/bjps/axr010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80755143451

VL - 62

SP - 857

EP - 894

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

IS - 4

ER -