How suspicion mitigates the effect of influence tactics

Shweta Oza, Joydeep Srivastava, Nevena T. Koukova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examines the role of suspicion in moderating the effect of psychological factors on satisfaction with bargaining outcomes. A suspicious mindset is induced by activating persuasion knowledge or the extent to which bargainers have knowledge about a psychological factor and recognize its potential persuasive influence. The results of four studies suggest that while time taken by an opponent to respond (Studies 1A and 1B), opponent providing a reference price that frames the outcome as a gain (Study 2), and opponent expressing unhappiness with an outcome (Study 3) increase satisfaction with bargaining outcome when bargainers' persuasion knowledge is not activated, these factors are rendered ineffective in increasing satisfaction when persuasion knowledge is activated. This research activates persuasion knowledge in three different ways (through priming, altering opponent's description, and providing an opportunity for gaming) and demonstrates that it is sufficient to induce a suspicious mindset that allows the associated defense mechanisms and coping strategies to guard against influence tactics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume112
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Persuasive Communication
Psychology
Defense Mechanisms
Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Suspicion
Influence tactics
Persuasion knowledge model
Psychological factors
Mindset

Keywords

  • Attributions
  • Bargaining
  • Delay
  • Emotions
  • Negotiations
  • Persuasion knowledge
  • Reference point
  • Suspicion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

How suspicion mitigates the effect of influence tactics. / Oza, Shweta; Srivastava, Joydeep; Koukova, Nevena T.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 112, No. 1, 05.2010, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oza, Shweta ; Srivastava, Joydeep ; Koukova, Nevena T. / How suspicion mitigates the effect of influence tactics. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010 ; Vol. 112, No. 1. pp. 1-10.
@article{8d8b1d8b01a8476a975bc49c721e5e10,
title = "How suspicion mitigates the effect of influence tactics",
abstract = "This research examines the role of suspicion in moderating the effect of psychological factors on satisfaction with bargaining outcomes. A suspicious mindset is induced by activating persuasion knowledge or the extent to which bargainers have knowledge about a psychological factor and recognize its potential persuasive influence. The results of four studies suggest that while time taken by an opponent to respond (Studies 1A and 1B), opponent providing a reference price that frames the outcome as a gain (Study 2), and opponent expressing unhappiness with an outcome (Study 3) increase satisfaction with bargaining outcome when bargainers' persuasion knowledge is not activated, these factors are rendered ineffective in increasing satisfaction when persuasion knowledge is activated. This research activates persuasion knowledge in three different ways (through priming, altering opponent's description, and providing an opportunity for gaming) and demonstrates that it is sufficient to induce a suspicious mindset that allows the associated defense mechanisms and coping strategies to guard against influence tactics.",
keywords = "Attributions, Bargaining, Delay, Emotions, Negotiations, Persuasion knowledge, Reference point, Suspicion",
author = "Shweta Oza and Joydeep Srivastava and Koukova, {Nevena T.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How suspicion mitigates the effect of influence tactics

AU - Oza, Shweta

AU - Srivastava, Joydeep

AU - Koukova, Nevena T.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - This research examines the role of suspicion in moderating the effect of psychological factors on satisfaction with bargaining outcomes. A suspicious mindset is induced by activating persuasion knowledge or the extent to which bargainers have knowledge about a psychological factor and recognize its potential persuasive influence. The results of four studies suggest that while time taken by an opponent to respond (Studies 1A and 1B), opponent providing a reference price that frames the outcome as a gain (Study 2), and opponent expressing unhappiness with an outcome (Study 3) increase satisfaction with bargaining outcome when bargainers' persuasion knowledge is not activated, these factors are rendered ineffective in increasing satisfaction when persuasion knowledge is activated. This research activates persuasion knowledge in three different ways (through priming, altering opponent's description, and providing an opportunity for gaming) and demonstrates that it is sufficient to induce a suspicious mindset that allows the associated defense mechanisms and coping strategies to guard against influence tactics.

AB - This research examines the role of suspicion in moderating the effect of psychological factors on satisfaction with bargaining outcomes. A suspicious mindset is induced by activating persuasion knowledge or the extent to which bargainers have knowledge about a psychological factor and recognize its potential persuasive influence. The results of four studies suggest that while time taken by an opponent to respond (Studies 1A and 1B), opponent providing a reference price that frames the outcome as a gain (Study 2), and opponent expressing unhappiness with an outcome (Study 3) increase satisfaction with bargaining outcome when bargainers' persuasion knowledge is not activated, these factors are rendered ineffective in increasing satisfaction when persuasion knowledge is activated. This research activates persuasion knowledge in three different ways (through priming, altering opponent's description, and providing an opportunity for gaming) and demonstrates that it is sufficient to induce a suspicious mindset that allows the associated defense mechanisms and coping strategies to guard against influence tactics.

KW - Attributions

KW - Bargaining

KW - Delay

KW - Emotions

KW - Negotiations

KW - Persuasion knowledge

KW - Reference point

KW - Suspicion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949873710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949873710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949873710

VL - 112

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -