How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed? Commentary

Kathleen F. Brookfield, Mark Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective case series by Han et al. that investigated the management of spinal disease during pregnancy. On the basis of their experiences with 10 patients, Han et al. concluded that pregnant women who have progressive neurological deficit at 34-36 weeks' gestation or later should undergo induction of delivery or cesarean section before, or at the same time as, they undergo spinal surgery. As expressed by Han et al., MRI is the safest imaging modality with which to diagnose spinal disorders in pregnancy; however, it is our opinion that single exposure to any source of radiation from diagnostic imaging is unlikely to justify advising the pregnant patient to undergo therapeutic abortion. Spinal surgery has successfully relieved neurological symptoms in pregnant patients with spinal disorders and been followed by a successful delivery in a number of circumstances. In order to provide the optimum care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, however, a health-care team involving the spine surgeon, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist is necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-653
Number of pages2
JournalNature Clinical Practice Neurology
Volume4
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2008

Fingerprint

Spinal Diseases
Pregnant Women
Pregnancy
Therapeutic Abortion
Patient Care Team
Diagnostic Imaging
Cesarean Section
Spine
Fetus
Radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed? Commentary. / Brookfield, Kathleen F.; Brown, Mark.

In: Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, Vol. 4, No. 12, 11.12.2008, p. 652-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9711014044ef4083a78508f468facc46,
title = "How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed? Commentary",
abstract = "This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective case series by Han et al. that investigated the management of spinal disease during pregnancy. On the basis of their experiences with 10 patients, Han et al. concluded that pregnant women who have progressive neurological deficit at 34-36 weeks' gestation or later should undergo induction of delivery or cesarean section before, or at the same time as, they undergo spinal surgery. As expressed by Han et al., MRI is the safest imaging modality with which to diagnose spinal disorders in pregnancy; however, it is our opinion that single exposure to any source of radiation from diagnostic imaging is unlikely to justify advising the pregnant patient to undergo therapeutic abortion. Spinal surgery has successfully relieved neurological symptoms in pregnant patients with spinal disorders and been followed by a successful delivery in a number of circumstances. In order to provide the optimum care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, however, a health-care team involving the spine surgeon, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist is necessary.",
author = "Brookfield, {Kathleen F.} and Mark Brown",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1038/ncpneuro0952",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "652--653",
journal = "Nature Reviews Neurology",
issn = "1759-4758",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed? Commentary

AU - Brookfield, Kathleen F.

AU - Brown, Mark

PY - 2008/12/11

Y1 - 2008/12/11

N2 - This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective case series by Han et al. that investigated the management of spinal disease during pregnancy. On the basis of their experiences with 10 patients, Han et al. concluded that pregnant women who have progressive neurological deficit at 34-36 weeks' gestation or later should undergo induction of delivery or cesarean section before, or at the same time as, they undergo spinal surgery. As expressed by Han et al., MRI is the safest imaging modality with which to diagnose spinal disorders in pregnancy; however, it is our opinion that single exposure to any source of radiation from diagnostic imaging is unlikely to justify advising the pregnant patient to undergo therapeutic abortion. Spinal surgery has successfully relieved neurological symptoms in pregnant patients with spinal disorders and been followed by a successful delivery in a number of circumstances. In order to provide the optimum care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, however, a health-care team involving the spine surgeon, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist is necessary.

AB - This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective case series by Han et al. that investigated the management of spinal disease during pregnancy. On the basis of their experiences with 10 patients, Han et al. concluded that pregnant women who have progressive neurological deficit at 34-36 weeks' gestation or later should undergo induction of delivery or cesarean section before, or at the same time as, they undergo spinal surgery. As expressed by Han et al., MRI is the safest imaging modality with which to diagnose spinal disorders in pregnancy; however, it is our opinion that single exposure to any source of radiation from diagnostic imaging is unlikely to justify advising the pregnant patient to undergo therapeutic abortion. Spinal surgery has successfully relieved neurological symptoms in pregnant patients with spinal disorders and been followed by a successful delivery in a number of circumstances. In order to provide the optimum care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, however, a health-care team involving the spine surgeon, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist is necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57249105341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57249105341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ncpneuro0952

DO - 10.1038/ncpneuro0952

M3 - Article

C2 - 19043422

AN - SCOPUS:57249105341

VL - 4

SP - 652

EP - 653

JO - Nature Reviews Neurology

JF - Nature Reviews Neurology

SN - 1759-4758

IS - 12

ER -