How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance?

Yi Liu, Ying Huang, Yadong Luo, Yang Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Supply chains
Managers
Justice
Buyer-supplier relationships
Buyers
Informational justice
Suppliers
Procedural justice
Supplier performance
Distributor
Distributive justice
Supply chain relationships
Loose coupling
China
Dyadic relationships
Fairness
Knowledge sharing
Resources

Keywords

  • Buyer-supplier relationships
  • Justice
  • Loose coupling theory
  • Relationship performance
  • Supply chain management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance? / Liu, Yi; Huang, Ying; Luo, Yadong; Zhao, Yang.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, 07.2012, p. 355-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a155731890124d4484875b8041625bed,
title = "How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance?",
abstract = "This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.",
keywords = "Buyer-supplier relationships, Justice, Loose coupling theory, Relationship performance, Supply chain management",
author = "Yi Liu and Ying Huang and Yadong Luo and Yang Zhao",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "355--367",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance?

AU - Liu, Yi

AU - Huang, Ying

AU - Luo, Yadong

AU - Zhao, Yang

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.

AB - This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.

KW - Buyer-supplier relationships

KW - Justice

KW - Loose coupling theory

KW - Relationship performance

KW - Supply chain management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860135078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860135078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860135078

VL - 30

SP - 355

EP - 367

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 5

ER -