How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance?

Yi Liu, Ying Huang, Yadong Luo, Yang Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-367
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Buyer-supplier relationships
  • Justice
  • Loose coupling theory
  • Relationship performance
  • Supply chain management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this