How content acquisition method affects word of mouth

Zoey Chen, Jonah Berger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People often share word of mouth with others, and such social sharing is an integral part of everyday life. But the content (e.g., stories, news, information) that people transmit can be acquired in different ways. Sometimes people find content themselves, and other times people receive content from others (e.g., via email or conversation). Might these different acquisition methods impact subsequent sharing, and if so, how? Six studies demonstrate that acquisition method can impact transmission through changing how content is processed. Compared to received content, people are more likely to associate found content with themselves, which decreases processing. Reduced processing, in turn, lowers sensitivity to diagnostic content characteristics (e.g., whether content is interesting or well written), which reduces these characteristics' impact on sharing. Thus while receivers are more likely to share interesting (than boring) content, the difference is attenuated (and in some cases, disappeared) among finders. These findings deepen insights into the psychological drivers of word of mouth and shed light on how contextual factors, content characteristics, and the self interact to drive social transmission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-102
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Word-of-mouth
everyday life
diagnostic
conversation
news
recipient
driver
News
Factor content
Electronic mail
Diagnostics
Integral
Psychological
Contextual factors
Everyday life
Electronic Mail
News Stories
Social Transmission
Contextual Factors
Everyday Life

Keywords

  • Interpersonal communication
  • Social sharing
  • Word of mouth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

How content acquisition method affects word of mouth. / Chen, Zoey; Berger, Jonah.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2016, p. 86-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Zoey ; Berger, Jonah. / How content acquisition method affects word of mouth. In: Journal of Consumer Research. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 86-102.
@article{0295942416fb4f01946a810024dfbd3f,
title = "How content acquisition method affects word of mouth",
abstract = "People often share word of mouth with others, and such social sharing is an integral part of everyday life. But the content (e.g., stories, news, information) that people transmit can be acquired in different ways. Sometimes people find content themselves, and other times people receive content from others (e.g., via email or conversation). Might these different acquisition methods impact subsequent sharing, and if so, how? Six studies demonstrate that acquisition method can impact transmission through changing how content is processed. Compared to received content, people are more likely to associate found content with themselves, which decreases processing. Reduced processing, in turn, lowers sensitivity to diagnostic content characteristics (e.g., whether content is interesting or well written), which reduces these characteristics' impact on sharing. Thus while receivers are more likely to share interesting (than boring) content, the difference is attenuated (and in some cases, disappeared) among finders. These findings deepen insights into the psychological drivers of word of mouth and shed light on how contextual factors, content characteristics, and the self interact to drive social transmission.",
keywords = "Interpersonal communication, Social sharing, Word of mouth",
author = "Zoey Chen and Jonah Berger",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/jcr/ucw001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "86--102",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How content acquisition method affects word of mouth

AU - Chen, Zoey

AU - Berger, Jonah

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - People often share word of mouth with others, and such social sharing is an integral part of everyday life. But the content (e.g., stories, news, information) that people transmit can be acquired in different ways. Sometimes people find content themselves, and other times people receive content from others (e.g., via email or conversation). Might these different acquisition methods impact subsequent sharing, and if so, how? Six studies demonstrate that acquisition method can impact transmission through changing how content is processed. Compared to received content, people are more likely to associate found content with themselves, which decreases processing. Reduced processing, in turn, lowers sensitivity to diagnostic content characteristics (e.g., whether content is interesting or well written), which reduces these characteristics' impact on sharing. Thus while receivers are more likely to share interesting (than boring) content, the difference is attenuated (and in some cases, disappeared) among finders. These findings deepen insights into the psychological drivers of word of mouth and shed light on how contextual factors, content characteristics, and the self interact to drive social transmission.

AB - People often share word of mouth with others, and such social sharing is an integral part of everyday life. But the content (e.g., stories, news, information) that people transmit can be acquired in different ways. Sometimes people find content themselves, and other times people receive content from others (e.g., via email or conversation). Might these different acquisition methods impact subsequent sharing, and if so, how? Six studies demonstrate that acquisition method can impact transmission through changing how content is processed. Compared to received content, people are more likely to associate found content with themselves, which decreases processing. Reduced processing, in turn, lowers sensitivity to diagnostic content characteristics (e.g., whether content is interesting or well written), which reduces these characteristics' impact on sharing. Thus while receivers are more likely to share interesting (than boring) content, the difference is attenuated (and in some cases, disappeared) among finders. These findings deepen insights into the psychological drivers of word of mouth and shed light on how contextual factors, content characteristics, and the self interact to drive social transmission.

KW - Interpersonal communication

KW - Social sharing

KW - Word of mouth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978962299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978962299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jcr/ucw001

DO - 10.1093/jcr/ucw001

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 86

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 1

ER -