Homegrown foreigners: how Christian nationalism and nativist attitudes impact Muslim civil liberties

Ramsey Dahab, Marisa Omori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Building from the literature on racialization of Muslims, we argue that there are two unique dimensions to anti-Muslim attitudes: Christian nationalism and nativism. Christian nationalism subscribes to the idea of Christianity as being central to American identity, and nativism provides insight into the monopolies regulating citizenship. We then test this framework’s hypotheses on data drawn from the General Social Survey in 2014 to see if these two dimensions predict support for civil rights infringements of Muslim-Americans compared to other outgroups, including atheists, communists, and racists. The results indicate both Christian nationalism and nativism have significant and negative effects on Muslim civil liberties. We also find some differences between the effects of Christian nationalism and nativism on Muslim civil liberties compared to the other outgroups. We interpret these results as an indication that nativism works as an ordering principle to reconstitute who counts as American and who does not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

nativism
nationalism
Muslim
outgroup
civil rights
Christianity
monopoly
indication
citizenship

Keywords

  • citizenship
  • civil rights
  • Muslim Americans
  • Nativism
  • racialization
  • religious nationalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{ea86be7c5aaa4af9a69a9f5b42e3e0ff,
title = "Homegrown foreigners: how Christian nationalism and nativist attitudes impact Muslim civil liberties",
abstract = "Building from the literature on racialization of Muslims, we argue that there are two unique dimensions to anti-Muslim attitudes: Christian nationalism and nativism. Christian nationalism subscribes to the idea of Christianity as being central to American identity, and nativism provides insight into the monopolies regulating citizenship. We then test this framework’s hypotheses on data drawn from the General Social Survey in 2014 to see if these two dimensions predict support for civil rights infringements of Muslim-Americans compared to other outgroups, including atheists, communists, and racists. The results indicate both Christian nationalism and nativism have significant and negative effects on Muslim civil liberties. We also find some differences between the effects of Christian nationalism and nativism on Muslim civil liberties compared to the other outgroups. We interpret these results as an indication that nativism works as an ordering principle to reconstitute who counts as American and who does not.",
keywords = "citizenship, civil rights, Muslim Americans, Nativism, racialization, religious nationalism",
author = "Ramsey Dahab and Marisa Omori",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01419870.2018.1506142",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
issn = "0141-9870",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Homegrown foreigners

T2 - how Christian nationalism and nativist attitudes impact Muslim civil liberties

AU - Dahab, Ramsey

AU - Omori, Marisa

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Building from the literature on racialization of Muslims, we argue that there are two unique dimensions to anti-Muslim attitudes: Christian nationalism and nativism. Christian nationalism subscribes to the idea of Christianity as being central to American identity, and nativism provides insight into the monopolies regulating citizenship. We then test this framework’s hypotheses on data drawn from the General Social Survey in 2014 to see if these two dimensions predict support for civil rights infringements of Muslim-Americans compared to other outgroups, including atheists, communists, and racists. The results indicate both Christian nationalism and nativism have significant and negative effects on Muslim civil liberties. We also find some differences between the effects of Christian nationalism and nativism on Muslim civil liberties compared to the other outgroups. We interpret these results as an indication that nativism works as an ordering principle to reconstitute who counts as American and who does not.

AB - Building from the literature on racialization of Muslims, we argue that there are two unique dimensions to anti-Muslim attitudes: Christian nationalism and nativism. Christian nationalism subscribes to the idea of Christianity as being central to American identity, and nativism provides insight into the monopolies regulating citizenship. We then test this framework’s hypotheses on data drawn from the General Social Survey in 2014 to see if these two dimensions predict support for civil rights infringements of Muslim-Americans compared to other outgroups, including atheists, communists, and racists. The results indicate both Christian nationalism and nativism have significant and negative effects on Muslim civil liberties. We also find some differences between the effects of Christian nationalism and nativism on Muslim civil liberties compared to the other outgroups. We interpret these results as an indication that nativism works as an ordering principle to reconstitute who counts as American and who does not.

KW - citizenship

KW - civil rights

KW - Muslim Americans

KW - Nativism

KW - racialization

KW - religious nationalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052136741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052136741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01419870.2018.1506142

DO - 10.1080/01419870.2018.1506142

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052136741

JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies

JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies

SN - 0141-9870

ER -