Henry Bryant Bigelow, the US Bureau of Fisheries, and Intensive Area Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Oceanographers have long viewed ‘intensive area study’ as a step in the internal development of oceanography. But for its first American practitioner, Henry Bryant Bigelow, intensive area study was a new and innovative approach that allowed him to pursue fundamental questions of hydrology and zoology within the restrictions imposed by his patron, the US Bureau of Fisheries. Intellectually, such methods promised a long-term solution to the problem of predicting fluctuations in fish populations; practically, they required little money and allowed Bigelow to stay physically near the New England fisheries. Reconstructing Bigelow's relationship to the USBF provides the political and social context necessary for understanding the origins and acceptance of a scientific practice. It also shows how scientists must often negotiate between the demands of their patrons for practical information and the demands of their disciplines for ‘pure’ science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-264
Number of pages26
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fisheries
fishery
Oceanography
Zoology
Hydrology
New England
fluctuation
Fishes
money
acceptance
science
Population
Area Studies
Patron
Scientific Practice
Fish
Social Context
Fluctuations
Acceptance
Fundamental

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Henry Bryant Bigelow, the US Bureau of Fisheries, and Intensive Area Study. / Brosco, Jeffrey P.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1989, p. 239-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02ca74a9631242f7a7711de449a710c4,
title = "Henry Bryant Bigelow, the US Bureau of Fisheries, and Intensive Area Study",
abstract = "Oceanographers have long viewed ‘intensive area study’ as a step in the internal development of oceanography. But for its first American practitioner, Henry Bryant Bigelow, intensive area study was a new and innovative approach that allowed him to pursue fundamental questions of hydrology and zoology within the restrictions imposed by his patron, the US Bureau of Fisheries. Intellectually, such methods promised a long-term solution to the problem of predicting fluctuations in fish populations; practically, they required little money and allowed Bigelow to stay physically near the New England fisheries. Reconstructing Bigelow's relationship to the USBF provides the political and social context necessary for understanding the origins and acceptance of a scientific practice. It also shows how scientists must often negotiate between the demands of their patrons for practical information and the demands of their disciplines for ‘pure’ science.",
author = "Brosco, {Jeffrey P}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1177/030631289019002002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "239--264",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Henry Bryant Bigelow, the US Bureau of Fisheries, and Intensive Area Study

AU - Brosco, Jeffrey P

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Oceanographers have long viewed ‘intensive area study’ as a step in the internal development of oceanography. But for its first American practitioner, Henry Bryant Bigelow, intensive area study was a new and innovative approach that allowed him to pursue fundamental questions of hydrology and zoology within the restrictions imposed by his patron, the US Bureau of Fisheries. Intellectually, such methods promised a long-term solution to the problem of predicting fluctuations in fish populations; practically, they required little money and allowed Bigelow to stay physically near the New England fisheries. Reconstructing Bigelow's relationship to the USBF provides the political and social context necessary for understanding the origins and acceptance of a scientific practice. It also shows how scientists must often negotiate between the demands of their patrons for practical information and the demands of their disciplines for ‘pure’ science.

AB - Oceanographers have long viewed ‘intensive area study’ as a step in the internal development of oceanography. But for its first American practitioner, Henry Bryant Bigelow, intensive area study was a new and innovative approach that allowed him to pursue fundamental questions of hydrology and zoology within the restrictions imposed by his patron, the US Bureau of Fisheries. Intellectually, such methods promised a long-term solution to the problem of predicting fluctuations in fish populations; practically, they required little money and allowed Bigelow to stay physically near the New England fisheries. Reconstructing Bigelow's relationship to the USBF provides the political and social context necessary for understanding the origins and acceptance of a scientific practice. It also shows how scientists must often negotiate between the demands of their patrons for practical information and the demands of their disciplines for ‘pure’ science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973194596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973194596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/030631289019002002

DO - 10.1177/030631289019002002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973194596

VL - 19

SP - 239

EP - 264

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 2

ER -