Health metrics and evaluation

strengthening the science

Christopher JL Murray, Julio Frenk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the growing importance of health in the global agenda comes the responsibility to develop a scientific foundation of metrics and evaluation. The scope of this emerging field can be viewed in terms of key topics, including health outcomes, other social outcomes related to health systems, health services, resource inputs, evaluations of programmes and systems, and analyses to support policy choice. It can also be defined in terms of key activities that are needed to strengthen the scientific basis of the field: development of new methods, instruments, software, and hardware; setting global norms and standards for data collection; increasing the availability of high-quality primary data; systematic analysis and synthesis of existing datasets; strengthening national capacity to obtain, analyse, and use data; and reporting and disseminating results. We explore in depth topics with major scientific challenges and institutional and cultural barriers that are slowing the development of the field. Cutting across the various topical areas and disciplinary approaches to these problems are some common scientific issues, including limited comparability of measurement, uncorrected known biases in data, no standard approach to missing data, unrealistic uncertainty estimates, and the use of disease models that have not been properly validated. Only through concerted action will it be possible to assure the production, reproduction, and use of knowledge that is crucial to the advancement of global health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1199
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet
Volume371
Issue number9619
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Resources
Health
Program Evaluation
Systems Analysis
Uncertainty
Health Services
Reproduction
Software
Global Health
Data Accuracy
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Health metrics and evaluation : strengthening the science. / Murray, Christopher JL; Frenk, Julio.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 371, No. 9619, 2008, p. 1191-1199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murray, Christopher JL ; Frenk, Julio. / Health metrics and evaluation : strengthening the science. In: The Lancet. 2008 ; Vol. 371, No. 9619. pp. 1191-1199.
@article{23d1803721984eebb51cb1422e54c610,
title = "Health metrics and evaluation: strengthening the science",
abstract = "With the growing importance of health in the global agenda comes the responsibility to develop a scientific foundation of metrics and evaluation. The scope of this emerging field can be viewed in terms of key topics, including health outcomes, other social outcomes related to health systems, health services, resource inputs, evaluations of programmes and systems, and analyses to support policy choice. It can also be defined in terms of key activities that are needed to strengthen the scientific basis of the field: development of new methods, instruments, software, and hardware; setting global norms and standards for data collection; increasing the availability of high-quality primary data; systematic analysis and synthesis of existing datasets; strengthening national capacity to obtain, analyse, and use data; and reporting and disseminating results. We explore in depth topics with major scientific challenges and institutional and cultural barriers that are slowing the development of the field. Cutting across the various topical areas and disciplinary approaches to these problems are some common scientific issues, including limited comparability of measurement, uncorrected known biases in data, no standard approach to missing data, unrealistic uncertainty estimates, and the use of disease models that have not been properly validated. Only through concerted action will it be possible to assure the production, reproduction, and use of knowledge that is crucial to the advancement of global health.",
author = "Murray, {Christopher JL} and Julio Frenk",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60526-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "371",
pages = "1191--1199",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9619",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health metrics and evaluation

T2 - strengthening the science

AU - Murray, Christopher JL

AU - Frenk, Julio

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - With the growing importance of health in the global agenda comes the responsibility to develop a scientific foundation of metrics and evaluation. The scope of this emerging field can be viewed in terms of key topics, including health outcomes, other social outcomes related to health systems, health services, resource inputs, evaluations of programmes and systems, and analyses to support policy choice. It can also be defined in terms of key activities that are needed to strengthen the scientific basis of the field: development of new methods, instruments, software, and hardware; setting global norms and standards for data collection; increasing the availability of high-quality primary data; systematic analysis and synthesis of existing datasets; strengthening national capacity to obtain, analyse, and use data; and reporting and disseminating results. We explore in depth topics with major scientific challenges and institutional and cultural barriers that are slowing the development of the field. Cutting across the various topical areas and disciplinary approaches to these problems are some common scientific issues, including limited comparability of measurement, uncorrected known biases in data, no standard approach to missing data, unrealistic uncertainty estimates, and the use of disease models that have not been properly validated. Only through concerted action will it be possible to assure the production, reproduction, and use of knowledge that is crucial to the advancement of global health.

AB - With the growing importance of health in the global agenda comes the responsibility to develop a scientific foundation of metrics and evaluation. The scope of this emerging field can be viewed in terms of key topics, including health outcomes, other social outcomes related to health systems, health services, resource inputs, evaluations of programmes and systems, and analyses to support policy choice. It can also be defined in terms of key activities that are needed to strengthen the scientific basis of the field: development of new methods, instruments, software, and hardware; setting global norms and standards for data collection; increasing the availability of high-quality primary data; systematic analysis and synthesis of existing datasets; strengthening national capacity to obtain, analyse, and use data; and reporting and disseminating results. We explore in depth topics with major scientific challenges and institutional and cultural barriers that are slowing the development of the field. Cutting across the various topical areas and disciplinary approaches to these problems are some common scientific issues, including limited comparability of measurement, uncorrected known biases in data, no standard approach to missing data, unrealistic uncertainty estimates, and the use of disease models that have not been properly validated. Only through concerted action will it be possible to assure the production, reproduction, and use of knowledge that is crucial to the advancement of global health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41449106519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41449106519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60526-7

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60526-7

M3 - Article

VL - 371

SP - 1191

EP - 1199

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9619

ER -