Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control?

Shiv Taylor, Anthony E. Voytovich, Robert Kozol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations declared pain level to be the "fifth vital sign." This has led to increased efforts to reduce patients' pain scores. Current postoperative analgesic modalities may not be entirely safe. We prospectively studied pain and sedation scores to determine whether postoperative patients were reaching sedation levels similar to patients undergoing "conscious sedation" (eg, colonoscopy cases). "Conscious sedation" patients have been shown to achieve states of sedation, which at time result in oxygen desaturation. Methods: Fifty-three patients within three groups were compared in an observational study. Group 1 included "conscious sedation" patients undergoing colonoscopy. Group 2 included postoperative patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Group 3 included postoperative patients under nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA). Levels of sedation were monitored using the 6-point Ramsay sedation scale. Pain and oxygen saturation were monitored using an 11-point verbal scale and finger pulse oximetry, respectively. Patients were monitored for up to 12 hours in the postoperative period or for the length of their colonoscopy procedure. Results: Patients in groups 1 and 2 reached similar sedation levels. Conclusions: Patients may reach dangerous levels of sedation during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Patients using PCA devices warrant close observation during this time period.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-475
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume186
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Postoperative Pain
Conscious Sedation
Colonoscopy
Pain
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Oxygen
Oximetry
Vital Signs
Postoperative Period
Analgesia
Fingers
Observational Studies
Analgesics
Nurses
Observation
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Patient controlled analgesia
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control? / Taylor, Shiv; Voytovich, Anthony E.; Kozol, Robert.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 186, No. 5, 01.11.2003, p. 472-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, Shiv ; Voytovich, Anthony E. ; Kozol, Robert. / Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control?. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 186, No. 5. pp. 472-475.
@article{f9d79794634746a78aee670f7041d283,
title = "Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control?",
abstract = "Background: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations declared pain level to be the {"}fifth vital sign.{"} This has led to increased efforts to reduce patients' pain scores. Current postoperative analgesic modalities may not be entirely safe. We prospectively studied pain and sedation scores to determine whether postoperative patients were reaching sedation levels similar to patients undergoing {"}conscious sedation{"} (eg, colonoscopy cases). {"}Conscious sedation{"} patients have been shown to achieve states of sedation, which at time result in oxygen desaturation. Methods: Fifty-three patients within three groups were compared in an observational study. Group 1 included {"}conscious sedation{"} patients undergoing colonoscopy. Group 2 included postoperative patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Group 3 included postoperative patients under nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA). Levels of sedation were monitored using the 6-point Ramsay sedation scale. Pain and oxygen saturation were monitored using an 11-point verbal scale and finger pulse oximetry, respectively. Patients were monitored for up to 12 hours in the postoperative period or for the length of their colonoscopy procedure. Results: Patients in groups 1 and 2 reached similar sedation levels. Conclusions: Patients may reach dangerous levels of sedation during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Patients using PCA devices warrant close observation during this time period.",
keywords = "Patient controlled analgesia, Safety",
author = "Shiv Taylor and Voytovich, {Anthony E.} and Robert Kozol",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021",
language = "English",
volume = "186",
pages = "472--475",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control?

AU - Taylor, Shiv

AU - Voytovich, Anthony E.

AU - Kozol, Robert

PY - 2003/11/1

Y1 - 2003/11/1

N2 - Background: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations declared pain level to be the "fifth vital sign." This has led to increased efforts to reduce patients' pain scores. Current postoperative analgesic modalities may not be entirely safe. We prospectively studied pain and sedation scores to determine whether postoperative patients were reaching sedation levels similar to patients undergoing "conscious sedation" (eg, colonoscopy cases). "Conscious sedation" patients have been shown to achieve states of sedation, which at time result in oxygen desaturation. Methods: Fifty-three patients within three groups were compared in an observational study. Group 1 included "conscious sedation" patients undergoing colonoscopy. Group 2 included postoperative patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Group 3 included postoperative patients under nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA). Levels of sedation were monitored using the 6-point Ramsay sedation scale. Pain and oxygen saturation were monitored using an 11-point verbal scale and finger pulse oximetry, respectively. Patients were monitored for up to 12 hours in the postoperative period or for the length of their colonoscopy procedure. Results: Patients in groups 1 and 2 reached similar sedation levels. Conclusions: Patients may reach dangerous levels of sedation during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Patients using PCA devices warrant close observation during this time period.

AB - Background: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations declared pain level to be the "fifth vital sign." This has led to increased efforts to reduce patients' pain scores. Current postoperative analgesic modalities may not be entirely safe. We prospectively studied pain and sedation scores to determine whether postoperative patients were reaching sedation levels similar to patients undergoing "conscious sedation" (eg, colonoscopy cases). "Conscious sedation" patients have been shown to achieve states of sedation, which at time result in oxygen desaturation. Methods: Fifty-three patients within three groups were compared in an observational study. Group 1 included "conscious sedation" patients undergoing colonoscopy. Group 2 included postoperative patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Group 3 included postoperative patients under nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA). Levels of sedation were monitored using the 6-point Ramsay sedation scale. Pain and oxygen saturation were monitored using an 11-point verbal scale and finger pulse oximetry, respectively. Patients were monitored for up to 12 hours in the postoperative period or for the length of their colonoscopy procedure. Results: Patients in groups 1 and 2 reached similar sedation levels. Conclusions: Patients may reach dangerous levels of sedation during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Patients using PCA devices warrant close observation during this time period.

KW - Patient controlled analgesia

KW - Safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242361294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242361294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 14599609

AN - SCOPUS:0242361294

VL - 186

SP - 472

EP - 475

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -