Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials [7]

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224
Number of pages1
JournalNeurology
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Carotid Stenosis
Age Factors
Practice Guidelines
Patient Selection
Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials [7]. / Chaturvedi, Seemant.

In: Neurology, Vol. 69, No. 2, 07.2007, p. 224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1160192b79b04e589ec2d13a1f6ab0eb,
title = "Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials [7]",
author = "Seemant Chaturvedi",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1212/01.wnl.0000271911.54805.13",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "224",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has evidence changed practice? Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials [7]

AU - Chaturvedi, Seemant

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447335855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447335855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271911.54805.13

DO - 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271911.54805.13

M3 - Article

C2 - 17620563

AN - SCOPUS:34447335855

VL - 69

SP - 224

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 2

ER -