Abstract
The author initiates a dialogue between Hans Urs von Balthasar and contemporary feminist theology, focusing on three areas: theological anthropology, theological method, and Christology. Each section begins by exploring Balthasar's theological standpoint. This is followed by feminist responses to the themes and questions raised by his theology, both favorable and critical. She concludes by exploring the mutual critiques that each theological standpoint poses to the other, arguing for the fruitfulness of this conversation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 566-595 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Theological Studies |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious studies
Cite this
Hans Urs von Balthasar and contemporary feminist theology. / Maldonado, Michelle G.
In: Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 65, No. 3, 01.09.2004, p. 566-595.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hans Urs von Balthasar and contemporary feminist theology
AU - Maldonado, Michelle G
PY - 2004/9/1
Y1 - 2004/9/1
N2 - The author initiates a dialogue between Hans Urs von Balthasar and contemporary feminist theology, focusing on three areas: theological anthropology, theological method, and Christology. Each section begins by exploring Balthasar's theological standpoint. This is followed by feminist responses to the themes and questions raised by his theology, both favorable and critical. She concludes by exploring the mutual critiques that each theological standpoint poses to the other, arguing for the fruitfulness of this conversation.
AB - The author initiates a dialogue between Hans Urs von Balthasar and contemporary feminist theology, focusing on three areas: theological anthropology, theological method, and Christology. Each section begins by exploring Balthasar's theological standpoint. This is followed by feminist responses to the themes and questions raised by his theology, both favorable and critical. She concludes by exploring the mutual critiques that each theological standpoint poses to the other, arguing for the fruitfulness of this conversation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949765281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60949765281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:60949765281
VL - 65
SP - 566
EP - 595
JO - Journal of Theological Studies
JF - Journal of Theological Studies
SN - 0022-5185
IS - 3
ER -