Grounding word learning in space

Larissa K. Samuelson, Linda B. Smith, Lynn Perry, John P. Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans and objects, and thus social interactions about objects, exist within space. Words direct listeners' attention to specific regions of space. Thus, a strong correspondence exists between where one looks, one's bodily orientation, and what one sees. This leads to further correspondence with what one remembers. Here, we present data suggesting that children use associations between space and objects and space and words to link words and objects-space binds labels to their referents. We tested this claim in four experiments, showing that the spatial consistency of where objects are presented affects children's word learning. Next, we demonstrate that a process model that grounds word learning in the known neural dynamics of spatial attention, spatial memory, and associative learning can capture the suite of results reported here. This model also predicts that space is special, a prediction supported in a fifth experiment that shows children do not use color as a cue to bind words and objects. In a final experiment, we ask whether spatial consistency affects word learning in naturalistic word learning contexts. Children of parents who spontaneously keep objects in a consistent spatial location during naming interactions learn words more effectively. Together, the model and data show that space is a powerful tool that can effectively ground word learning in social contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere28095
JournalPLoS One
Volume6
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 14 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electric grounding
learning
Learning
Experiments
Labels
Color
Data storage equipment
Interpersonal Relations
Cues
Parents
prediction
color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Samuelson, L. K., Smith, L. B., Perry, L., & Spencer, J. P. (2011). Grounding word learning in space. PLoS One, 6(12), [e28095]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028095

Grounding word learning in space. / Samuelson, Larissa K.; Smith, Linda B.; Perry, Lynn; Spencer, John P.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 6, No. 12, e28095, 14.12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Samuelson, LK, Smith, LB, Perry, L & Spencer, JP 2011, 'Grounding word learning in space', PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 12, e28095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028095
Samuelson LK, Smith LB, Perry L, Spencer JP. Grounding word learning in space. PLoS One. 2011 Dec 14;6(12). e28095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028095
Samuelson, Larissa K. ; Smith, Linda B. ; Perry, Lynn ; Spencer, John P. / Grounding word learning in space. In: PLoS One. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 12.
@article{5e3aa9d5119d422e871975a392d37fa5,
title = "Grounding word learning in space",
abstract = "Humans and objects, and thus social interactions about objects, exist within space. Words direct listeners' attention to specific regions of space. Thus, a strong correspondence exists between where one looks, one's bodily orientation, and what one sees. This leads to further correspondence with what one remembers. Here, we present data suggesting that children use associations between space and objects and space and words to link words and objects-space binds labels to their referents. We tested this claim in four experiments, showing that the spatial consistency of where objects are presented affects children's word learning. Next, we demonstrate that a process model that grounds word learning in the known neural dynamics of spatial attention, spatial memory, and associative learning can capture the suite of results reported here. This model also predicts that space is special, a prediction supported in a fifth experiment that shows children do not use color as a cue to bind words and objects. In a final experiment, we ask whether spatial consistency affects word learning in naturalistic word learning contexts. Children of parents who spontaneously keep objects in a consistent spatial location during naming interactions learn words more effectively. Together, the model and data show that space is a powerful tool that can effectively ground word learning in social contexts.",
author = "Samuelson, {Larissa K.} and Smith, {Linda B.} and Lynn Perry and Spencer, {John P.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0028095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grounding word learning in space

AU - Samuelson, Larissa K.

AU - Smith, Linda B.

AU - Perry, Lynn

AU - Spencer, John P.

PY - 2011/12/14

Y1 - 2011/12/14

N2 - Humans and objects, and thus social interactions about objects, exist within space. Words direct listeners' attention to specific regions of space. Thus, a strong correspondence exists between where one looks, one's bodily orientation, and what one sees. This leads to further correspondence with what one remembers. Here, we present data suggesting that children use associations between space and objects and space and words to link words and objects-space binds labels to their referents. We tested this claim in four experiments, showing that the spatial consistency of where objects are presented affects children's word learning. Next, we demonstrate that a process model that grounds word learning in the known neural dynamics of spatial attention, spatial memory, and associative learning can capture the suite of results reported here. This model also predicts that space is special, a prediction supported in a fifth experiment that shows children do not use color as a cue to bind words and objects. In a final experiment, we ask whether spatial consistency affects word learning in naturalistic word learning contexts. Children of parents who spontaneously keep objects in a consistent spatial location during naming interactions learn words more effectively. Together, the model and data show that space is a powerful tool that can effectively ground word learning in social contexts.

AB - Humans and objects, and thus social interactions about objects, exist within space. Words direct listeners' attention to specific regions of space. Thus, a strong correspondence exists between where one looks, one's bodily orientation, and what one sees. This leads to further correspondence with what one remembers. Here, we present data suggesting that children use associations between space and objects and space and words to link words and objects-space binds labels to their referents. We tested this claim in four experiments, showing that the spatial consistency of where objects are presented affects children's word learning. Next, we demonstrate that a process model that grounds word learning in the known neural dynamics of spatial attention, spatial memory, and associative learning can capture the suite of results reported here. This model also predicts that space is special, a prediction supported in a fifth experiment that shows children do not use color as a cue to bind words and objects. In a final experiment, we ask whether spatial consistency affects word learning in naturalistic word learning contexts. Children of parents who spontaneously keep objects in a consistent spatial location during naming interactions learn words more effectively. Together, the model and data show that space is a powerful tool that can effectively ground word learning in social contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83355173058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83355173058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0028095

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0028095

M3 - Article

C2 - 22194807

AN - SCOPUS:83355173058

VL - 6

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e28095

ER -