Greece and rome in America

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The classics appear conspicuously in the pamphlet wars of the American Revolution, though in the opinion of Bernard Bailyn (written many years ago), their presence is window-dressing and their influence superficial. They are everywhere illustrative, not determinative, of thought (my italics). Up the scale in influence comes Enlightenment rationalism, also superficial but only at times-that removes the foreigners, ancient and modern. Then, further up the scale are English common-law writers, powerfully influential though still insufficiently determinative; above them, a major source, New England Puritan thought and culture; and finally, at the top, seventeenth-century British heroes of liberty and the early eighteenth-century transmitters of this tradition, e.g. Commonwealth men, Bishop Hoadly. Who would have thought that the bishop of Winchester weighed in the balance more heavily than Plato and Aristotle? Only once in passing does Bailyn even mention Machiavelli, to whom J. G. A. Pocock, Quentin Skinner, and Harvey C. Mansfield would grant large prominence in the development of Revolutionary thought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-192
Number of pages16
JournalModern Intellectual History
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Greece
rationalism
Plato
Aristotle
common law
seventeenth century
eighteenth century
writer
Thought
Rome
Determinatives
Enlightenment
Winchester
American Revolution
Liberty
Pamphlets
Classical Studies
Hero
Common Law
Revolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • History
  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Greece and rome in America. / Russo, John Paul.

In: Modern Intellectual History, Vol. 10, No. 1, 04.2013, p. 177-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Russo, John Paul. / Greece and rome in America. In: Modern Intellectual History. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 177-192.
@article{08d8d0734d0143e890f17759ee66411d,
title = "Greece and rome in America",
abstract = "The classics appear conspicuously in the pamphlet wars of the American Revolution, though in the opinion of Bernard Bailyn (written many years ago), their presence is window-dressing and their influence superficial. They are everywhere illustrative, not determinative, of thought (my italics). Up the scale in influence comes Enlightenment rationalism, also superficial but only at times-that removes the foreigners, ancient and modern. Then, further up the scale are English common-law writers, powerfully influential though still insufficiently determinative; above them, a major source, New England Puritan thought and culture; and finally, at the top, seventeenth-century British heroes of liberty and the early eighteenth-century transmitters of this tradition, e.g. Commonwealth men, Bishop Hoadly. Who would have thought that the bishop of Winchester weighed in the balance more heavily than Plato and Aristotle? Only once in passing does Bailyn even mention Machiavelli, to whom J. G. A. Pocock, Quentin Skinner, and Harvey C. Mansfield would grant large prominence in the development of Revolutionary thought.",
author = "Russo, {John Paul}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S1479244312000406",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "177--192",
journal = "Modern Intellectual History",
issn = "1479-2443",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greece and rome in America

AU - Russo, John Paul

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - The classics appear conspicuously in the pamphlet wars of the American Revolution, though in the opinion of Bernard Bailyn (written many years ago), their presence is window-dressing and their influence superficial. They are everywhere illustrative, not determinative, of thought (my italics). Up the scale in influence comes Enlightenment rationalism, also superficial but only at times-that removes the foreigners, ancient and modern. Then, further up the scale are English common-law writers, powerfully influential though still insufficiently determinative; above them, a major source, New England Puritan thought and culture; and finally, at the top, seventeenth-century British heroes of liberty and the early eighteenth-century transmitters of this tradition, e.g. Commonwealth men, Bishop Hoadly. Who would have thought that the bishop of Winchester weighed in the balance more heavily than Plato and Aristotle? Only once in passing does Bailyn even mention Machiavelli, to whom J. G. A. Pocock, Quentin Skinner, and Harvey C. Mansfield would grant large prominence in the development of Revolutionary thought.

AB - The classics appear conspicuously in the pamphlet wars of the American Revolution, though in the opinion of Bernard Bailyn (written many years ago), their presence is window-dressing and their influence superficial. They are everywhere illustrative, not determinative, of thought (my italics). Up the scale in influence comes Enlightenment rationalism, also superficial but only at times-that removes the foreigners, ancient and modern. Then, further up the scale are English common-law writers, powerfully influential though still insufficiently determinative; above them, a major source, New England Puritan thought and culture; and finally, at the top, seventeenth-century British heroes of liberty and the early eighteenth-century transmitters of this tradition, e.g. Commonwealth men, Bishop Hoadly. Who would have thought that the bishop of Winchester weighed in the balance more heavily than Plato and Aristotle? Only once in passing does Bailyn even mention Machiavelli, to whom J. G. A. Pocock, Quentin Skinner, and Harvey C. Mansfield would grant large prominence in the development of Revolutionary thought.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879954072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879954072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1479244312000406

DO - 10.1017/S1479244312000406

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84879954072

VL - 10

SP - 177

EP - 192

JO - Modern Intellectual History

JF - Modern Intellectual History

SN - 1479-2443

IS - 1

ER -