Global Surgery Pro–Con Debate: A Pathway to Bilateral Academic Success or the Bold New Face of Colonialism?

Alyssa Scheiner, Jennifer L. Rickard, Benedict Nwomeh, Randeep S. Jawa, Enrique Ginzburg, Tamara N. Fitzgerald, Anthony Charles, Abebe Bekele

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Global surgery, especially academic global surgery, is of tremendous interest to many surgeons. Classically, it entails personnel from high-income countries going to low- and middle-income countries and engaging in educational activities as well as procedures. Academic medical personnel have included students, residents, and attendings. The pervasive notion is that this is a win–win situation for the volunteers and the hosts, that is, a pathway to bilateral academic success. However, a critical examination demonstrates that it can easily become the bold new face of colonialism of a low- and middle-income country by a high-income country.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • Colonialism
  • Education
  • Global surgery
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Global Surgery Pro–Con Debate: A Pathway to Bilateral Academic Success or the Bold New Face of Colonialism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this