Global budgets in Maryland: early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services

Margit Malmmose, Karoline Mortensen, Claus Holm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Maryland implemented one of the most aggressive payment innovations the nation has seen in several decades when it introduced global budgets in all its acute care hospitals in 2014. Prior to this, a pilot program, total patient revenue (TPR), was established for 8 rural hospitals in 2010. Using financial hospital report data from the Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2007 to 2013, we examined the hospitals’ financial results including revenue, costs, and profit/loss margins to explore the impact of the adoption of the TPR pilot global budget program relative to the remaining hospitals in the state. We analyze financial results for both regulated (included in the global budget and subject to rate-setting) and unregulated services in order to capture a holistic image of the hospitals’ actual revenue, cost and margin structures. Common size and difference-in-differences analyses of the data suggest that regulated profit ratios for treatment hospitals increased (from 5% in 2007 to 8% in 2013) and regulated expense-to-gross patient revenue ratios decreased (75% in 2007 and 68% in 2013) relative to the controls. Simultaneously, the profit margins for treatment hospitals’ unregulated services decreased (− 12% in 2007 and − 17% in 2013), which reduced the overall margin significantly. This analysis therefore indicates cost shifting and less profit gain from the program than identified by solely focusing on the regulated margins.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-408
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Health Economics and Management
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Budgets
Cost Allocation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Rural Hospitals
State Hospitals
Health Care Costs
Health Services
Expenses
Margin
Revenue
Therapeutics
Profit
Costs

Keywords

  • Global budgets
  • Health care finance
  • Maryland
  • Regulated and unregulated services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Global budgets in Maryland : early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services. / Malmmose, Margit; Mortensen, Karoline; Holm, Claus.

In: International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 395-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b23c936fb3e4421908c21487195cb39,
title = "Global budgets in Maryland: early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services",
abstract = "Maryland implemented one of the most aggressive payment innovations the nation has seen in several decades when it introduced global budgets in all its acute care hospitals in 2014. Prior to this, a pilot program, total patient revenue (TPR), was established for 8 rural hospitals in 2010. Using financial hospital report data from the Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2007 to 2013, we examined the hospitals’ financial results including revenue, costs, and profit/loss margins to explore the impact of the adoption of the TPR pilot global budget program relative to the remaining hospitals in the state. We analyze financial results for both regulated (included in the global budget and subject to rate-setting) and unregulated services in order to capture a holistic image of the hospitals’ actual revenue, cost and margin structures. Common size and difference-in-differences analyses of the data suggest that regulated profit ratios for treatment hospitals increased (from 5{\%} in 2007 to 8{\%} in 2013) and regulated expense-to-gross patient revenue ratios decreased (75{\%} in 2007 and 68{\%} in 2013) relative to the controls. Simultaneously, the profit margins for treatment hospitals’ unregulated services decreased (− 12{\%} in 2007 and − 17{\%} in 2013), which reduced the overall margin significantly. This analysis therefore indicates cost shifting and less profit gain from the program than identified by solely focusing on the regulated margins.",
keywords = "Global budgets, Health care finance, Maryland, Regulated and unregulated services",
author = "Margit Malmmose and Karoline Mortensen and Claus Holm",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10754-018-9239-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "395--408",
journal = "International Journal of Health Economics and Management",
issn = "2199-9023",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global budgets in Maryland

T2 - early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services

AU - Malmmose, Margit

AU - Mortensen, Karoline

AU - Holm, Claus

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Maryland implemented one of the most aggressive payment innovations the nation has seen in several decades when it introduced global budgets in all its acute care hospitals in 2014. Prior to this, a pilot program, total patient revenue (TPR), was established for 8 rural hospitals in 2010. Using financial hospital report data from the Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2007 to 2013, we examined the hospitals’ financial results including revenue, costs, and profit/loss margins to explore the impact of the adoption of the TPR pilot global budget program relative to the remaining hospitals in the state. We analyze financial results for both regulated (included in the global budget and subject to rate-setting) and unregulated services in order to capture a holistic image of the hospitals’ actual revenue, cost and margin structures. Common size and difference-in-differences analyses of the data suggest that regulated profit ratios for treatment hospitals increased (from 5% in 2007 to 8% in 2013) and regulated expense-to-gross patient revenue ratios decreased (75% in 2007 and 68% in 2013) relative to the controls. Simultaneously, the profit margins for treatment hospitals’ unregulated services decreased (− 12% in 2007 and − 17% in 2013), which reduced the overall margin significantly. This analysis therefore indicates cost shifting and less profit gain from the program than identified by solely focusing on the regulated margins.

AB - Maryland implemented one of the most aggressive payment innovations the nation has seen in several decades when it introduced global budgets in all its acute care hospitals in 2014. Prior to this, a pilot program, total patient revenue (TPR), was established for 8 rural hospitals in 2010. Using financial hospital report data from the Health Services Cost Review Commission from 2007 to 2013, we examined the hospitals’ financial results including revenue, costs, and profit/loss margins to explore the impact of the adoption of the TPR pilot global budget program relative to the remaining hospitals in the state. We analyze financial results for both regulated (included in the global budget and subject to rate-setting) and unregulated services in order to capture a holistic image of the hospitals’ actual revenue, cost and margin structures. Common size and difference-in-differences analyses of the data suggest that regulated profit ratios for treatment hospitals increased (from 5% in 2007 to 8% in 2013) and regulated expense-to-gross patient revenue ratios decreased (75% in 2007 and 68% in 2013) relative to the controls. Simultaneously, the profit margins for treatment hospitals’ unregulated services decreased (− 12% in 2007 and − 17% in 2013), which reduced the overall margin significantly. This analysis therefore indicates cost shifting and less profit gain from the program than identified by solely focusing on the regulated margins.

KW - Global budgets

KW - Health care finance

KW - Maryland

KW - Regulated and unregulated services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044777815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044777815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10754-018-9239-y

DO - 10.1007/s10754-018-9239-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 29611068

AN - SCOPUS:85044777815

VL - 18

SP - 395

EP - 408

JO - International Journal of Health Economics and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Economics and Management

SN - 2199-9023

IS - 4

ER -