Giant retinal tear as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments during cataract surgery

Jr Aaberg T.M., P. E. Rubsamen, Harry W Flynn, S. Chang, W. F. Mieler, William E Smiddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report giant retinal tear and retinal detachment as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments at the time of cataract surgery and to evaluate the anatomic and visual acuity outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment surgery. METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed. RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90%) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70%) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal- based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-226
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume124
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 21 1997

Fingerprint

Retinal Perforations
Cataract
Lenses
Retinal Detachment
Vitrectomy
Temazepam
Visual Acuity
Motion Perception
Phacoemulsification
Fingers
Retina
Referral and Consultation
Hand
Transplants
Light

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Giant retinal tear as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments during cataract surgery. / Aaberg T.M., Jr; Rubsamen, P. E.; Flynn, Harry W; Chang, S.; Mieler, W. F.; Smiddy, William E.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 124, No. 2, 21.08.1997, p. 222-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d423f0d0f994daeb34b13aed15b523a,
title = "Giant retinal tear as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments during cataract surgery",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To report giant retinal tear and retinal detachment as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments at the time of cataract surgery and to evaluate the anatomic and visual acuity outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment surgery. METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed. RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90{\%}) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70{\%}) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal- based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.",
author = "{Aaberg T.M.}, Jr and Rubsamen, {P. E.} and Flynn, {Harry W} and S. Chang and Mieler, {W. F.} and Smiddy, {William E}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
day = "21",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "222--226",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giant retinal tear as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments during cataract surgery

AU - Aaberg T.M., Jr

AU - Rubsamen, P. E.

AU - Flynn, Harry W

AU - Chang, S.

AU - Mieler, W. F.

AU - Smiddy, William E

PY - 1997/8/21

Y1 - 1997/8/21

N2 - PURPOSE: To report giant retinal tear and retinal detachment as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments at the time of cataract surgery and to evaluate the anatomic and visual acuity outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment surgery. METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed. RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90%) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70%) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal- based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.

AB - PURPOSE: To report giant retinal tear and retinal detachment as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments at the time of cataract surgery and to evaluate the anatomic and visual acuity outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment surgery. METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed. RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90%) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70%) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal- based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030849925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030849925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9262547

AN - SCOPUS:0030849925

VL - 124

SP - 222

EP - 226

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 2

ER -