Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury

Diana D. Cardenas, Thomas N. Bryce, Kazuko Shem, J. Scott Richards, Hanaa Elhefni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cardenas DD, Bryce TN, Shem K, Richards JS, Elhefni H. Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1774-81. Objectives To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. Design Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. Setting Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). Participants A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. Results Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81% at 1 year postinjury to 82.7% at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. Conclusions Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1774-1781
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume85
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Pain
Sexual Minorities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Paraplegia
Violence

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Pain
  • Race
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spinal cord injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. / Cardenas, Diana D.; Bryce, Thomas N.; Shem, Kazuko; Richards, J. Scott; Elhefni, Hanaa.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 85, No. 11, 01.11.2004, p. 1774-1781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cardenas, Diana D. ; Bryce, Thomas N. ; Shem, Kazuko ; Richards, J. Scott ; Elhefni, Hanaa. / Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004 ; Vol. 85, No. 11. pp. 1774-1781.
@article{9ce300667bcf493cb6b99d4100d2da70,
title = "Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Cardenas DD, Bryce TN, Shem K, Richards JS, Elhefni H. Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1774-81. Objectives To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. Design Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. Setting Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). Participants A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. Results Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81{\%} at 1 year postinjury to 82.7{\%} at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. Conclusions Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.",
keywords = "Gender, Pain, Race, Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries",
author = "Cardenas, {Diana D.} and Bryce, {Thomas N.} and Kazuko Shem and Richards, {J. Scott} and Hanaa Elhefni",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.027",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "1774--1781",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury

AU - Cardenas, Diana D.

AU - Bryce, Thomas N.

AU - Shem, Kazuko

AU - Richards, J. Scott

AU - Elhefni, Hanaa

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - Cardenas DD, Bryce TN, Shem K, Richards JS, Elhefni H. Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1774-81. Objectives To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. Design Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. Setting Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). Participants A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. Results Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81% at 1 year postinjury to 82.7% at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. Conclusions Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.

AB - Cardenas DD, Bryce TN, Shem K, Richards JS, Elhefni H. Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1774-81. Objectives To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. Design Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. Setting Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). Participants A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. Results Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81% at 1 year postinjury to 82.7% at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. Conclusions Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.

KW - Gender

KW - Pain

KW - Race

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Spinal cord injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444271484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444271484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.027

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 15520972

AN - SCOPUS:7444271484

VL - 85

SP - 1774

EP - 1781

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 11

ER -