Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load

Lytt I. Gardner, Gary Marks, Unnati Patel, Edward Cachay, Tracey E. Wilson, Michael Stirratt, Allan E Rodriguez, Meg Sullivan, Jeanne C. Keruly, Thomas P. Giordano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current guidelines specify that visit intervals with viral monitoring should not exceed 6 months for HIV patients. Yet, gaps in care exceeding 6 months are common. In an observational cohort using US patients, we examined the association between gap length and changes in viral load status and sought to determine the length of the gap at which significant increases in viral load occur. We identified patients with gaps in care greater than 6 months from 6399 patients from six US HIV clinics. Gap strata were >6 to <7, 7 to <8, 8 to <9, 9 to <12, and ≥12 months, with viral load measurements matched to the opening and closing dates for the gaps. We examined visit gap lengths in association with two viral load measurements: continuous (log10 viral load at gap opening and closing) and dichotomous (whether patients initially suppressed but lost viral suppression by close of the care gap). Viral load increases were nonsignificant or modest when gap length was <9 months, corresponding to 10% or fewer patients who lost viral suppression. For gaps ≥12 months, there was a significant increase in viral load as well as a much larger loss of viral suppression (in 23% of patients). Detrimental effects on viral load after a care gap were greater in young patients, black patients, and those without private health insurance. On average, shorter gaps in care were not detrimental to patient viral load status. HIV primary care visit intervals of 6 to 9 months for select patients may be appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-164
Number of pages8
JournalAIDS Patient Care and STDs
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Viral Load
Primary Health Care
HIV
Health Insurance
Guidelines

Keywords

  • gaps in care
  • HIV
  • viral load
  • viral suppression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Gardner, L. I., Marks, G., Patel, U., Cachay, E., Wilson, T. E., Stirratt, M., ... Giordano, T. P. (2018). Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 32(4), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2018.0001

Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load. / Gardner, Lytt I.; Marks, Gary; Patel, Unnati; Cachay, Edward; Wilson, Tracey E.; Stirratt, Michael; Rodriguez, Allan E; Sullivan, Meg; Keruly, Jeanne C.; Giordano, Thomas P.

In: AIDS Patient Care and STDs, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 157-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardner, LI, Marks, G, Patel, U, Cachay, E, Wilson, TE, Stirratt, M, Rodriguez, AE, Sullivan, M, Keruly, JC & Giordano, TP 2018, 'Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load', AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2018.0001
Gardner LI, Marks G, Patel U, Cachay E, Wilson TE, Stirratt M et al. Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2018 Apr 1;32(4):157-164. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2018.0001
Gardner, Lytt I. ; Marks, Gary ; Patel, Unnati ; Cachay, Edward ; Wilson, Tracey E. ; Stirratt, Michael ; Rodriguez, Allan E ; Sullivan, Meg ; Keruly, Jeanne C. ; Giordano, Thomas P. / Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load. In: AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 157-164.
@article{5c9576be018444d5a052dec229fc318a,
title = "Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load",
abstract = "Current guidelines specify that visit intervals with viral monitoring should not exceed 6 months for HIV patients. Yet, gaps in care exceeding 6 months are common. In an observational cohort using US patients, we examined the association between gap length and changes in viral load status and sought to determine the length of the gap at which significant increases in viral load occur. We identified patients with gaps in care greater than 6 months from 6399 patients from six US HIV clinics. Gap strata were >6 to <7, 7 to <8, 8 to <9, 9 to <12, and ≥12 months, with viral load measurements matched to the opening and closing dates for the gaps. We examined visit gap lengths in association with two viral load measurements: continuous (log10 viral load at gap opening and closing) and dichotomous (whether patients initially suppressed but lost viral suppression by close of the care gap). Viral load increases were nonsignificant or modest when gap length was <9 months, corresponding to 10{\%} or fewer patients who lost viral suppression. For gaps ≥12 months, there was a significant increase in viral load as well as a much larger loss of viral suppression (in 23{\%} of patients). Detrimental effects on viral load after a care gap were greater in young patients, black patients, and those without private health insurance. On average, shorter gaps in care were not detrimental to patient viral load status. HIV primary care visit intervals of 6 to 9 months for select patients may be appropriate.",
keywords = "gaps in care, HIV, viral load, viral suppression",
author = "Gardner, {Lytt I.} and Gary Marks and Unnati Patel and Edward Cachay and Wilson, {Tracey E.} and Michael Stirratt and Rodriguez, {Allan E} and Meg Sullivan and Keruly, {Jeanne C.} and Giordano, {Thomas P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/apc.2018.0001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "157--164",
journal = "AIDS Patient Care and STDs",
issn = "1087-2914",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaps Up to 9 Months between HIV Primary Care Visits Do Not Worsen Viral Load

AU - Gardner, Lytt I.

AU - Marks, Gary

AU - Patel, Unnati

AU - Cachay, Edward

AU - Wilson, Tracey E.

AU - Stirratt, Michael

AU - Rodriguez, Allan E

AU - Sullivan, Meg

AU - Keruly, Jeanne C.

AU - Giordano, Thomas P.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Current guidelines specify that visit intervals with viral monitoring should not exceed 6 months for HIV patients. Yet, gaps in care exceeding 6 months are common. In an observational cohort using US patients, we examined the association between gap length and changes in viral load status and sought to determine the length of the gap at which significant increases in viral load occur. We identified patients with gaps in care greater than 6 months from 6399 patients from six US HIV clinics. Gap strata were >6 to <7, 7 to <8, 8 to <9, 9 to <12, and ≥12 months, with viral load measurements matched to the opening and closing dates for the gaps. We examined visit gap lengths in association with two viral load measurements: continuous (log10 viral load at gap opening and closing) and dichotomous (whether patients initially suppressed but lost viral suppression by close of the care gap). Viral load increases were nonsignificant or modest when gap length was <9 months, corresponding to 10% or fewer patients who lost viral suppression. For gaps ≥12 months, there was a significant increase in viral load as well as a much larger loss of viral suppression (in 23% of patients). Detrimental effects on viral load after a care gap were greater in young patients, black patients, and those without private health insurance. On average, shorter gaps in care were not detrimental to patient viral load status. HIV primary care visit intervals of 6 to 9 months for select patients may be appropriate.

AB - Current guidelines specify that visit intervals with viral monitoring should not exceed 6 months for HIV patients. Yet, gaps in care exceeding 6 months are common. In an observational cohort using US patients, we examined the association between gap length and changes in viral load status and sought to determine the length of the gap at which significant increases in viral load occur. We identified patients with gaps in care greater than 6 months from 6399 patients from six US HIV clinics. Gap strata were >6 to <7, 7 to <8, 8 to <9, 9 to <12, and ≥12 months, with viral load measurements matched to the opening and closing dates for the gaps. We examined visit gap lengths in association with two viral load measurements: continuous (log10 viral load at gap opening and closing) and dichotomous (whether patients initially suppressed but lost viral suppression by close of the care gap). Viral load increases were nonsignificant or modest when gap length was <9 months, corresponding to 10% or fewer patients who lost viral suppression. For gaps ≥12 months, there was a significant increase in viral load as well as a much larger loss of viral suppression (in 23% of patients). Detrimental effects on viral load after a care gap were greater in young patients, black patients, and those without private health insurance. On average, shorter gaps in care were not detrimental to patient viral load status. HIV primary care visit intervals of 6 to 9 months for select patients may be appropriate.

KW - gaps in care

KW - HIV

KW - viral load

KW - viral suppression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045209772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045209772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/apc.2018.0001

DO - 10.1089/apc.2018.0001

M3 - Article

C2 - 29630849

AN - SCOPUS:85045209772

VL - 32

SP - 157

EP - 164

JO - AIDS Patient Care and STDs

JF - AIDS Patient Care and STDs

SN - 1087-2914

IS - 4

ER -