Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity

E. Abdel-Moty, David A Fishbain, T. M. Khalil, S. Sadek, R. Cutler, R. S. Rosomoff, H. L. Rosomoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The pain physician is often asked to establish the medical impairment of the chronic pain patient (CPP) and from that determination ascertain the work capacity of the CPP. Functional capacity (FC) testing has recently been introduced as a more objective and accurate way of facilitating the determination of work capacity. However, there are conceptual problems with the measurement of FC. These will be reviewed and the relationship of FC to residual functional capacity (RFC) will be determined. Finally, a method for measuring RFC in a job-specific manner will be suggested. Data Sources: The literature in reference to the measurement of medical impairment, FC, and RFC was reviewed. Study Selection: Studies appropriate to the objective of this review were selected for inclusion. Conclusions: The FC and RFC are poorly defined. Lack of definition has interfered with design of appropriate test batteries specific to work capacity. To circumvent this problem a job- specific RFC measurement method is suggested. This method is based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-173
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of Pain
Volume9
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Functional Residual Capacity
Chronic Pain
Information Storage and Retrieval
Physicians
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Abdel-Moty, E., Fishbain, D. A., Khalil, T. M., Sadek, S., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, R. S., & Rosomoff, H. L. (1993). Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clinical Journal of Pain, 9(3), 168-173.

Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. / Abdel-Moty, E.; Fishbain, David A; Khalil, T. M.; Sadek, S.; Cutler, R.; Rosomoff, R. S.; Rosomoff, H. L.

In: Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 168-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdel-Moty, E, Fishbain, DA, Khalil, TM, Sadek, S, Cutler, R, Rosomoff, RS & Rosomoff, HL 1993, 'Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity', Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 168-173.
Abdel-Moty E, Fishbain DA, Khalil TM, Sadek S, Cutler R, Rosomoff RS et al. Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clinical Journal of Pain. 1993 Jan 1;9(3):168-173.
Abdel-Moty, E. ; Fishbain, David A ; Khalil, T. M. ; Sadek, S. ; Cutler, R. ; Rosomoff, R. S. ; Rosomoff, H. L. / Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. In: Clinical Journal of Pain. 1993 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 168-173.
@article{8108f09461b94201ad9e2845e682dc3c,
title = "Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity",
abstract = "Objective: The pain physician is often asked to establish the medical impairment of the chronic pain patient (CPP) and from that determination ascertain the work capacity of the CPP. Functional capacity (FC) testing has recently been introduced as a more objective and accurate way of facilitating the determination of work capacity. However, there are conceptual problems with the measurement of FC. These will be reviewed and the relationship of FC to residual functional capacity (RFC) will be determined. Finally, a method for measuring RFC in a job-specific manner will be suggested. Data Sources: The literature in reference to the measurement of medical impairment, FC, and RFC was reviewed. Study Selection: Studies appropriate to the objective of this review were selected for inclusion. Conclusions: The FC and RFC are poorly defined. Lack of definition has interfered with design of appropriate test batteries specific to work capacity. To circumvent this problem a job- specific RFC measurement method is suggested. This method is based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.",
author = "E. Abdel-Moty and Fishbain, {David A} and Khalil, {T. M.} and S. Sadek and R. Cutler and Rosomoff, {R. S.} and Rosomoff, {H. L.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "168--173",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity

AU - Abdel-Moty, E.

AU - Fishbain, David A

AU - Khalil, T. M.

AU - Sadek, S.

AU - Cutler, R.

AU - Rosomoff, R. S.

AU - Rosomoff, H. L.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Objective: The pain physician is often asked to establish the medical impairment of the chronic pain patient (CPP) and from that determination ascertain the work capacity of the CPP. Functional capacity (FC) testing has recently been introduced as a more objective and accurate way of facilitating the determination of work capacity. However, there are conceptual problems with the measurement of FC. These will be reviewed and the relationship of FC to residual functional capacity (RFC) will be determined. Finally, a method for measuring RFC in a job-specific manner will be suggested. Data Sources: The literature in reference to the measurement of medical impairment, FC, and RFC was reviewed. Study Selection: Studies appropriate to the objective of this review were selected for inclusion. Conclusions: The FC and RFC are poorly defined. Lack of definition has interfered with design of appropriate test batteries specific to work capacity. To circumvent this problem a job- specific RFC measurement method is suggested. This method is based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

AB - Objective: The pain physician is often asked to establish the medical impairment of the chronic pain patient (CPP) and from that determination ascertain the work capacity of the CPP. Functional capacity (FC) testing has recently been introduced as a more objective and accurate way of facilitating the determination of work capacity. However, there are conceptual problems with the measurement of FC. These will be reviewed and the relationship of FC to residual functional capacity (RFC) will be determined. Finally, a method for measuring RFC in a job-specific manner will be suggested. Data Sources: The literature in reference to the measurement of medical impairment, FC, and RFC was reviewed. Study Selection: Studies appropriate to the objective of this review were selected for inclusion. Conclusions: The FC and RFC are poorly defined. Lack of definition has interfered with design of appropriate test batteries specific to work capacity. To circumvent this problem a job- specific RFC measurement method is suggested. This method is based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027209588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027209588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 168

EP - 173

JO - Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 3

ER -