Frozen section evaluation via dynamic real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a university cancer center by resident/faculty cooperation team

Aram Vosoughi, Paul Taylor Smith, Joseph Zeitouni, Gregori M. Sodeman MSc, Merce Jorda, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, Monica Garcia-Buitrago, Atousa Ordobazari, Carol Petito, Jennifer R. Chapman, German Campuzano-Zuluaga, Andrew E. Rosenberg, Oleksandr N. Kryvenko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Frozen section telepathology interpretation experience has been largely limited to practices with locations significantly distant from one another with sporadic need for frozen section diagnosis. In 2010, we established a real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a very active cancer center for daily frozen section service. Herein, we evaluate its accuracy compared to direct microscopic interpretation performed in the main hospital by the same faculty and its cost-efficiency over a 1-year period. From 643 (1,416 parts) cases requiring intraoperative consultation, 333 cases (690 parts) were examined by telepathology and 310 cases (726 parts) by direct microscopy. Corresponding discrepancy rates were 2.6% (18 cases: 6 [0.9%] sampling and 12 [1.7%] diagnostic errors) and 3.2% (23 cases: 8 [1.1%] sampling and 15 [2.1%] diagnostic errors), P =.63. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative frozen diagnosis were 0.92 and 0.99, respectively, in telepathology and 0.90 and 0.99, respectively, in direct microscopy. There was no correlation of error incidence with postgraduate year level of residents involved in the telepathology service. Cost analysis indicated that the time saved by telepathology was $19,691.00 over 1 year of the study period, whereas the capital cost for establishing the system was $8,924.00. Thus, real-time nonrobotic telepathology is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for frozen section evaluation in busy clinical settings, especially when frozen section service involves more than one hospital, and it is cost-efficient when travel is a component of the service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-150
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Telepathology
Frozen Sections
Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Diagnostic Errors
Microscopy
Referral and Consultation
Economics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Incidence

Keywords

  • Discrepancy
  • Efficiency
  • Frozen section
  • Pathology resident
  • Telepathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Frozen section evaluation via dynamic real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a university cancer center by resident/faculty cooperation team. / Vosoughi, Aram; Smith, Paul Taylor; Zeitouni, Joseph; Sodeman MSc, Gregori M.; Jorda, Merce; Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen; Garcia-Buitrago, Monica; Ordobazari, Atousa; Petito, Carol; Chapman, Jennifer R.; Campuzano-Zuluaga, German; Rosenberg, Andrew E.; Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 78, 01.08.2018, p. 144-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78857eb149304fa7954b0f456e5401b5,
title = "Frozen section evaluation via dynamic real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a university cancer center by resident/faculty cooperation team",
abstract = "Frozen section telepathology interpretation experience has been largely limited to practices with locations significantly distant from one another with sporadic need for frozen section diagnosis. In 2010, we established a real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a very active cancer center for daily frozen section service. Herein, we evaluate its accuracy compared to direct microscopic interpretation performed in the main hospital by the same faculty and its cost-efficiency over a 1-year period. From 643 (1,416 parts) cases requiring intraoperative consultation, 333 cases (690 parts) were examined by telepathology and 310 cases (726 parts) by direct microscopy. Corresponding discrepancy rates were 2.6{\%} (18 cases: 6 [0.9{\%}] sampling and 12 [1.7{\%}] diagnostic errors) and 3.2{\%} (23 cases: 8 [1.1{\%}] sampling and 15 [2.1{\%}] diagnostic errors), P =.63. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative frozen diagnosis were 0.92 and 0.99, respectively, in telepathology and 0.90 and 0.99, respectively, in direct microscopy. There was no correlation of error incidence with postgraduate year level of residents involved in the telepathology service. Cost analysis indicated that the time saved by telepathology was $19,691.00 over 1 year of the study period, whereas the capital cost for establishing the system was $8,924.00. Thus, real-time nonrobotic telepathology is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for frozen section evaluation in busy clinical settings, especially when frozen section service involves more than one hospital, and it is cost-efficient when travel is a component of the service.",
keywords = "Discrepancy, Efficiency, Frozen section, Pathology resident, Telepathology",
author = "Aram Vosoughi and Smith, {Paul Taylor} and Joseph Zeitouni and {Sodeman MSc}, {Gregori M.} and Merce Jorda and Carmen Gomez-Fernandez and Monica Garcia-Buitrago and Atousa Ordobazari and Carol Petito and Chapman, {Jennifer R.} and German Campuzano-Zuluaga and Rosenberg, {Andrew E.} and Kryvenko, {Oleksandr N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "144--150",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frozen section evaluation via dynamic real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a university cancer center by resident/faculty cooperation team

AU - Vosoughi, Aram

AU - Smith, Paul Taylor

AU - Zeitouni, Joseph

AU - Sodeman MSc, Gregori M.

AU - Jorda, Merce

AU - Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen

AU - Garcia-Buitrago, Monica

AU - Ordobazari, Atousa

AU - Petito, Carol

AU - Chapman, Jennifer R.

AU - Campuzano-Zuluaga, German

AU - Rosenberg, Andrew E.

AU - Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Frozen section telepathology interpretation experience has been largely limited to practices with locations significantly distant from one another with sporadic need for frozen section diagnosis. In 2010, we established a real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a very active cancer center for daily frozen section service. Herein, we evaluate its accuracy compared to direct microscopic interpretation performed in the main hospital by the same faculty and its cost-efficiency over a 1-year period. From 643 (1,416 parts) cases requiring intraoperative consultation, 333 cases (690 parts) were examined by telepathology and 310 cases (726 parts) by direct microscopy. Corresponding discrepancy rates were 2.6% (18 cases: 6 [0.9%] sampling and 12 [1.7%] diagnostic errors) and 3.2% (23 cases: 8 [1.1%] sampling and 15 [2.1%] diagnostic errors), P =.63. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative frozen diagnosis were 0.92 and 0.99, respectively, in telepathology and 0.90 and 0.99, respectively, in direct microscopy. There was no correlation of error incidence with postgraduate year level of residents involved in the telepathology service. Cost analysis indicated that the time saved by telepathology was $19,691.00 over 1 year of the study period, whereas the capital cost for establishing the system was $8,924.00. Thus, real-time nonrobotic telepathology is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for frozen section evaluation in busy clinical settings, especially when frozen section service involves more than one hospital, and it is cost-efficient when travel is a component of the service.

AB - Frozen section telepathology interpretation experience has been largely limited to practices with locations significantly distant from one another with sporadic need for frozen section diagnosis. In 2010, we established a real-time nonrobotic telepathology system in a very active cancer center for daily frozen section service. Herein, we evaluate its accuracy compared to direct microscopic interpretation performed in the main hospital by the same faculty and its cost-efficiency over a 1-year period. From 643 (1,416 parts) cases requiring intraoperative consultation, 333 cases (690 parts) were examined by telepathology and 310 cases (726 parts) by direct microscopy. Corresponding discrepancy rates were 2.6% (18 cases: 6 [0.9%] sampling and 12 [1.7%] diagnostic errors) and 3.2% (23 cases: 8 [1.1%] sampling and 15 [2.1%] diagnostic errors), P =.63. The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative frozen diagnosis were 0.92 and 0.99, respectively, in telepathology and 0.90 and 0.99, respectively, in direct microscopy. There was no correlation of error incidence with postgraduate year level of residents involved in the telepathology service. Cost analysis indicated that the time saved by telepathology was $19,691.00 over 1 year of the study period, whereas the capital cost for establishing the system was $8,924.00. Thus, real-time nonrobotic telepathology is a reliable and easy-to-use tool for frozen section evaluation in busy clinical settings, especially when frozen section service involves more than one hospital, and it is cost-efficient when travel is a component of the service.

KW - Discrepancy

KW - Efficiency

KW - Frozen section

KW - Pathology resident

KW - Telepathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048932451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048932451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 29723604

AN - SCOPUS:85048932451

VL - 78

SP - 144

EP - 150

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

ER -