Florida's agriculture and climatic variability

Reducing vulnerability

David Letson, J. W. Hansen, P. E. Hildebrand, J. W. Jones, J. J. O'Brien, Guillermo P Podesta, F. S. Royce, D. F. Zierden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss what climate variability and ENSO are and why they are important for Florida's agriculture. We also discuss which regions, commodities, and production technologies are most vulnerable. We then make the case for climate forecasting as an emerging technical improvement that enables producers to avoid some of the potential damages associated with climatic variability and also to take advantage of some profitable opportunities. As is true of other technical improvements for agriculture, there is no guarantee that researchers will provide the climate forecast products farmers want most nor that farmers will understand how best to use climate forecasts. Nor will climate forecasts necessarily improve economic performance immediately, but only in the longer term. A successful forecasting process will require not only that researchers produce accurate forecasts and that farmers incorporate them into their decisions, but also that the forecast producers and users communicate with one another.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-57
Number of pages20
JournalFlorida Geographer
Issue number32
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

vulnerability
agriculture
climate
farmer
producer
commodity
El Nino-Southern Oscillation
guarantee
damages
forecast
damage
economics
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Letson, D., Hansen, J. W., Hildebrand, P. E., Jones, J. W., O'Brien, J. J., Podesta, G. P., ... Zierden, D. F. (2001). Florida's agriculture and climatic variability: Reducing vulnerability. Florida Geographer, (32), 38-57.

Florida's agriculture and climatic variability : Reducing vulnerability. / Letson, David; Hansen, J. W.; Hildebrand, P. E.; Jones, J. W.; O'Brien, J. J.; Podesta, Guillermo P; Royce, F. S.; Zierden, D. F.

In: Florida Geographer, No. 32, 2001, p. 38-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Letson, D, Hansen, JW, Hildebrand, PE, Jones, JW, O'Brien, JJ, Podesta, GP, Royce, FS & Zierden, DF 2001, 'Florida's agriculture and climatic variability: Reducing vulnerability', Florida Geographer, no. 32, pp. 38-57.
Letson D, Hansen JW, Hildebrand PE, Jones JW, O'Brien JJ, Podesta GP et al. Florida's agriculture and climatic variability: Reducing vulnerability. Florida Geographer. 2001;(32):38-57.
Letson, David ; Hansen, J. W. ; Hildebrand, P. E. ; Jones, J. W. ; O'Brien, J. J. ; Podesta, Guillermo P ; Royce, F. S. ; Zierden, D. F. / Florida's agriculture and climatic variability : Reducing vulnerability. In: Florida Geographer. 2001 ; No. 32. pp. 38-57.
@article{2cd2e362a8494c1382e0a5cb5ba9f47f,
title = "Florida's agriculture and climatic variability: Reducing vulnerability",
abstract = "In this paper we discuss what climate variability and ENSO are and why they are important for Florida's agriculture. We also discuss which regions, commodities, and production technologies are most vulnerable. We then make the case for climate forecasting as an emerging technical improvement that enables producers to avoid some of the potential damages associated with climatic variability and also to take advantage of some profitable opportunities. As is true of other technical improvements for agriculture, there is no guarantee that researchers will provide the climate forecast products farmers want most nor that farmers will understand how best to use climate forecasts. Nor will climate forecasts necessarily improve economic performance immediately, but only in the longer term. A successful forecasting process will require not only that researchers produce accurate forecasts and that farmers incorporate them into their decisions, but also that the forecast producers and users communicate with one another.",
author = "David Letson and Hansen, {J. W.} and Hildebrand, {P. E.} and Jones, {J. W.} and O'Brien, {J. J.} and Podesta, {Guillermo P} and Royce, {F. S.} and Zierden, {D. F.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "38--57",
journal = "Florida Geographer",
issn = "0739-0041",
publisher = "Florida State University",
number = "32",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Florida's agriculture and climatic variability

T2 - Reducing vulnerability

AU - Letson, David

AU - Hansen, J. W.

AU - Hildebrand, P. E.

AU - Jones, J. W.

AU - O'Brien, J. J.

AU - Podesta, Guillermo P

AU - Royce, F. S.

AU - Zierden, D. F.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In this paper we discuss what climate variability and ENSO are and why they are important for Florida's agriculture. We also discuss which regions, commodities, and production technologies are most vulnerable. We then make the case for climate forecasting as an emerging technical improvement that enables producers to avoid some of the potential damages associated with climatic variability and also to take advantage of some profitable opportunities. As is true of other technical improvements for agriculture, there is no guarantee that researchers will provide the climate forecast products farmers want most nor that farmers will understand how best to use climate forecasts. Nor will climate forecasts necessarily improve economic performance immediately, but only in the longer term. A successful forecasting process will require not only that researchers produce accurate forecasts and that farmers incorporate them into their decisions, but also that the forecast producers and users communicate with one another.

AB - In this paper we discuss what climate variability and ENSO are and why they are important for Florida's agriculture. We also discuss which regions, commodities, and production technologies are most vulnerable. We then make the case for climate forecasting as an emerging technical improvement that enables producers to avoid some of the potential damages associated with climatic variability and also to take advantage of some profitable opportunities. As is true of other technical improvements for agriculture, there is no guarantee that researchers will provide the climate forecast products farmers want most nor that farmers will understand how best to use climate forecasts. Nor will climate forecasts necessarily improve economic performance immediately, but only in the longer term. A successful forecasting process will require not only that researchers produce accurate forecasts and that farmers incorporate them into their decisions, but also that the forecast producers and users communicate with one another.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035198330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035198330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 38

EP - 57

JO - Florida Geographer

JF - Florida Geographer

SN - 0739-0041

IS - 32

ER -