Florida red tide perception: Residents versus tourists

Kate Nierenberg, Margaret M Byrne, Lora E. Fleming, Wendy Stephan, Andrew Reich, Lorraine C. Backer, Elvira Tanga, Dana R. Dalpra, Barbara Kirkpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The west coast of Florida has annual blooms of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis with Sarasota, FL considered the epicenter for these blooms. Numerous outreach materials, including Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) cards, exhibits for local museums and aquaria, public beach signs, and numerous websites have been developed to disseminate information to the public about this natural hazard. In addition, during intense onshore blooms, a great deal of media attention, primarily via newspaper (print and web) and television, is focused on red tide. However to date, the only measure of effectiveness of these outreach methods has been counts of the number of people exposed to the information, e.g., visits to a website or number of FAQ cards distributed. No formal assessment has been conducted to determine if these materials meet their goal of informing the public about Florida red tide. Also, although local residents have the opinion that they are very knowledgeable about Florida red tide, this has not been verified empirically. This study addressed these issues by creating and administering an evaluation tool for the assessment of public knowledge about Florida red tide. A focus group of Florida red tide outreach developers assisted in the creation of the evaluation tool. The location of the evaluation was the west coast of Florida, in Sarasota County. The objective was to assess the knowledge of the general public about Florida red tide. This assessment identified gaps in public knowledge regarding Florida red tides and also identified what information sources people want to use to obtain information on Florida red tide. The results from this study can be used to develop more effective outreach materials on Florida red tide.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-606
Number of pages7
JournalHarmful Algae
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

red tide
tourists
algal blooms
outreach
algal bloom
news media
coasts
coast
television
natural hazard
aquarium
focus groups
earthquake epicenter
dinoflagellate
information sources
toxin
museum
aquariums
public
beaches

Keywords

  • Communication tools
  • Evaluation of outreach and education
  • Florida red tide
  • Harmful algal blooms and public knowledge
  • Karenia brevis
  • Outreach and education
  • Resident risk perception
  • Seafood safety
  • Tourist risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Nierenberg, K., Byrne, M. M., Fleming, L. E., Stephan, W., Reich, A., Backer, L. C., ... Kirkpatrick, B. (2010). Florida red tide perception: Residents versus tourists. Harmful Algae, 9(6), 600-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010

Florida red tide perception : Residents versus tourists. / Nierenberg, Kate; Byrne, Margaret M; Fleming, Lora E.; Stephan, Wendy; Reich, Andrew; Backer, Lorraine C.; Tanga, Elvira; Dalpra, Dana R.; Kirkpatrick, Barbara.

In: Harmful Algae, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.09.2010, p. 600-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nierenberg, K, Byrne, MM, Fleming, LE, Stephan, W, Reich, A, Backer, LC, Tanga, E, Dalpra, DR & Kirkpatrick, B 2010, 'Florida red tide perception: Residents versus tourists', Harmful Algae, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 600-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010
Nierenberg K, Byrne MM, Fleming LE, Stephan W, Reich A, Backer LC et al. Florida red tide perception: Residents versus tourists. Harmful Algae. 2010 Sep 1;9(6):600-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010
Nierenberg, Kate ; Byrne, Margaret M ; Fleming, Lora E. ; Stephan, Wendy ; Reich, Andrew ; Backer, Lorraine C. ; Tanga, Elvira ; Dalpra, Dana R. ; Kirkpatrick, Barbara. / Florida red tide perception : Residents versus tourists. In: Harmful Algae. 2010 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 600-606.
@article{ff0b5910a7da4a8588374b3877a37cdd,
title = "Florida red tide perception: Residents versus tourists",
abstract = "The west coast of Florida has annual blooms of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis with Sarasota, FL considered the epicenter for these blooms. Numerous outreach materials, including Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) cards, exhibits for local museums and aquaria, public beach signs, and numerous websites have been developed to disseminate information to the public about this natural hazard. In addition, during intense onshore blooms, a great deal of media attention, primarily via newspaper (print and web) and television, is focused on red tide. However to date, the only measure of effectiveness of these outreach methods has been counts of the number of people exposed to the information, e.g., visits to a website or number of FAQ cards distributed. No formal assessment has been conducted to determine if these materials meet their goal of informing the public about Florida red tide. Also, although local residents have the opinion that they are very knowledgeable about Florida red tide, this has not been verified empirically. This study addressed these issues by creating and administering an evaluation tool for the assessment of public knowledge about Florida red tide. A focus group of Florida red tide outreach developers assisted in the creation of the evaluation tool. The location of the evaluation was the west coast of Florida, in Sarasota County. The objective was to assess the knowledge of the general public about Florida red tide. This assessment identified gaps in public knowledge regarding Florida red tides and also identified what information sources people want to use to obtain information on Florida red tide. The results from this study can be used to develop more effective outreach materials on Florida red tide.",
keywords = "Communication tools, Evaluation of outreach and education, Florida red tide, Harmful algal blooms and public knowledge, Karenia brevis, Outreach and education, Resident risk perception, Seafood safety, Tourist risk perception",
author = "Kate Nierenberg and Byrne, {Margaret M} and Fleming, {Lora E.} and Wendy Stephan and Andrew Reich and Backer, {Lorraine C.} and Elvira Tanga and Dalpra, {Dana R.} and Barbara Kirkpatrick",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "600--606",
journal = "Harmful Algae",
issn = "1568-9883",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Florida red tide perception

T2 - Residents versus tourists

AU - Nierenberg, Kate

AU - Byrne, Margaret M

AU - Fleming, Lora E.

AU - Stephan, Wendy

AU - Reich, Andrew

AU - Backer, Lorraine C.

AU - Tanga, Elvira

AU - Dalpra, Dana R.

AU - Kirkpatrick, Barbara

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - The west coast of Florida has annual blooms of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis with Sarasota, FL considered the epicenter for these blooms. Numerous outreach materials, including Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) cards, exhibits for local museums and aquaria, public beach signs, and numerous websites have been developed to disseminate information to the public about this natural hazard. In addition, during intense onshore blooms, a great deal of media attention, primarily via newspaper (print and web) and television, is focused on red tide. However to date, the only measure of effectiveness of these outreach methods has been counts of the number of people exposed to the information, e.g., visits to a website or number of FAQ cards distributed. No formal assessment has been conducted to determine if these materials meet their goal of informing the public about Florida red tide. Also, although local residents have the opinion that they are very knowledgeable about Florida red tide, this has not been verified empirically. This study addressed these issues by creating and administering an evaluation tool for the assessment of public knowledge about Florida red tide. A focus group of Florida red tide outreach developers assisted in the creation of the evaluation tool. The location of the evaluation was the west coast of Florida, in Sarasota County. The objective was to assess the knowledge of the general public about Florida red tide. This assessment identified gaps in public knowledge regarding Florida red tides and also identified what information sources people want to use to obtain information on Florida red tide. The results from this study can be used to develop more effective outreach materials on Florida red tide.

AB - The west coast of Florida has annual blooms of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis with Sarasota, FL considered the epicenter for these blooms. Numerous outreach materials, including Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) cards, exhibits for local museums and aquaria, public beach signs, and numerous websites have been developed to disseminate information to the public about this natural hazard. In addition, during intense onshore blooms, a great deal of media attention, primarily via newspaper (print and web) and television, is focused on red tide. However to date, the only measure of effectiveness of these outreach methods has been counts of the number of people exposed to the information, e.g., visits to a website or number of FAQ cards distributed. No formal assessment has been conducted to determine if these materials meet their goal of informing the public about Florida red tide. Also, although local residents have the opinion that they are very knowledgeable about Florida red tide, this has not been verified empirically. This study addressed these issues by creating and administering an evaluation tool for the assessment of public knowledge about Florida red tide. A focus group of Florida red tide outreach developers assisted in the creation of the evaluation tool. The location of the evaluation was the west coast of Florida, in Sarasota County. The objective was to assess the knowledge of the general public about Florida red tide. This assessment identified gaps in public knowledge regarding Florida red tides and also identified what information sources people want to use to obtain information on Florida red tide. The results from this study can be used to develop more effective outreach materials on Florida red tide.

KW - Communication tools

KW - Evaluation of outreach and education

KW - Florida red tide

KW - Harmful algal blooms and public knowledge

KW - Karenia brevis

KW - Outreach and education

KW - Resident risk perception

KW - Seafood safety

KW - Tourist risk perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955572301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955572301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955572301

VL - 9

SP - 600

EP - 606

JO - Harmful Algae

JF - Harmful Algae

SN - 1568-9883

IS - 6

ER -