Flexural behavior and design of RC members using FRP reinforcement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flexural design for concrete members reinforced with fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) composites may be conducted using both the ultimate-strength method and the working-stress method. Since FRP reinforcement does not yield, there should be the explicit provision that failure be controlled by concrete crushing as opposed to reinforcement rupture. Deflection control may become as important as flexural strength for the design of FRP-reinforced concrete structures. The paper contends that, at this stage of development, the working-stress method is better suited to FRP-reinforced concrete. The primary reasons are that the predicted ultimate moment capacity represents a highly variable state only attainable at a high level of deformation and crack opening and that it depends strictly on concrete ultimate strain. FRP reinforcement is better suited to pre- and posttensioned-type concrete members; however, it cannot be ruled out that FRP should become the reinforcement of choice in special nonprestressed applications where durability or magnetic permeability are the controlling parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3344-3359
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of structural engineering New York, N.Y.
Volume119
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fiber reinforced plastics
Reinforcement
Concretes
Reinforced concrete
Magnetic permeability
Crushing
Concrete construction
Bending strength
Durability
Cracks
Composite materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Flexural behavior and design of RC members using FRP reinforcement. / Nanni, Antonio.

In: Journal of structural engineering New York, N.Y., Vol. 119, No. 11, 01.11.1993, p. 3344-3359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f018fe9550484472983e9e92108af0d3,
title = "Flexural behavior and design of RC members using FRP reinforcement",
abstract = "Flexural design for concrete members reinforced with fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) composites may be conducted using both the ultimate-strength method and the working-stress method. Since FRP reinforcement does not yield, there should be the explicit provision that failure be controlled by concrete crushing as opposed to reinforcement rupture. Deflection control may become as important as flexural strength for the design of FRP-reinforced concrete structures. The paper contends that, at this stage of development, the working-stress method is better suited to FRP-reinforced concrete. The primary reasons are that the predicted ultimate moment capacity represents a highly variable state only attainable at a high level of deformation and crack opening and that it depends strictly on concrete ultimate strain. FRP reinforcement is better suited to pre- and posttensioned-type concrete members; however, it cannot be ruled out that FRP should become the reinforcement of choice in special nonprestressed applications where durability or magnetic permeability are the controlling parameters.",
author = "Antonio Nanni",
year = "1993",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "3344--3359",
journal = "Journal of Structural Engineering",
issn = "0733-9445",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexural behavior and design of RC members using FRP reinforcement

AU - Nanni, Antonio

PY - 1993/11/1

Y1 - 1993/11/1

N2 - Flexural design for concrete members reinforced with fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) composites may be conducted using both the ultimate-strength method and the working-stress method. Since FRP reinforcement does not yield, there should be the explicit provision that failure be controlled by concrete crushing as opposed to reinforcement rupture. Deflection control may become as important as flexural strength for the design of FRP-reinforced concrete structures. The paper contends that, at this stage of development, the working-stress method is better suited to FRP-reinforced concrete. The primary reasons are that the predicted ultimate moment capacity represents a highly variable state only attainable at a high level of deformation and crack opening and that it depends strictly on concrete ultimate strain. FRP reinforcement is better suited to pre- and posttensioned-type concrete members; however, it cannot be ruled out that FRP should become the reinforcement of choice in special nonprestressed applications where durability or magnetic permeability are the controlling parameters.

AB - Flexural design for concrete members reinforced with fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) composites may be conducted using both the ultimate-strength method and the working-stress method. Since FRP reinforcement does not yield, there should be the explicit provision that failure be controlled by concrete crushing as opposed to reinforcement rupture. Deflection control may become as important as flexural strength for the design of FRP-reinforced concrete structures. The paper contends that, at this stage of development, the working-stress method is better suited to FRP-reinforced concrete. The primary reasons are that the predicted ultimate moment capacity represents a highly variable state only attainable at a high level of deformation and crack opening and that it depends strictly on concrete ultimate strain. FRP reinforcement is better suited to pre- and posttensioned-type concrete members; however, it cannot be ruled out that FRP should become the reinforcement of choice in special nonprestressed applications where durability or magnetic permeability are the controlling parameters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027694503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027694503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027694503

VL - 119

SP - 3344

EP - 3359

JO - Journal of Structural Engineering

JF - Journal of Structural Engineering

SN - 0733-9445

IS - 11

ER -