Financial implications of a hospital's specialization in rare physiologically complex surgical procedures

Ruth E. Wachtel, Franklin Dexter, David Lubarsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The authors previously identified a hospital that has a unique role in its region for surgical care. In children aged 0-2 yr, the hospital performed 64% of all physiologically complex procedures statewide (≥ 8 American Society of Anesthesiologists Relative Value Guide basic units). For all age groups combined, 48% of the physiologically complex procedures performed at that hospital were rare, defined as < 1/workday statewide. Methods: The authors tested the hypothesis that financially important differences can result from performing relatively large numbers of such specialized procedures. Methods were developed to compare contribution margin (revenue from facility and professional fees minus variable costs) per operating room hour (CM/OR hour) between patient groups and different types of surgical procedures. Results: CM/OR hour was significantly larger by a financially important amount (> $250/OR hour) for pediatric versus geriatric patients (P ≤ 0.002), primarily because of higher professional reimbursements, with no difference in hospital reimbursements. Unexpectedly, CM/OR hour was also significantly greater by at least $250 when a rare procedure was involved (P < 0.001 for all ages combined), primarily because of greater hospital reimbursements. For cases involving implant charges of $10,000 or greater, overall CM/OR hour was negative because increased revenues did not compensate for the high variable costs. Conclusions: Other hospitals can use these methods to perform a similar analysis of the financial impact of those patient populations or surgical procedures that are unique to their own roles in their regional healthcare systems, and to identify the sources of financial losses and gains experienced by the hospital.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

Fingerprint

Geriatrics
Age Groups
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Financial implications of a hospital's specialization in rare physiologically complex surgical procedures. / Wachtel, Ruth E.; Dexter, Franklin; Lubarsky, David.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 01.07.2005, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wachtel, Ruth E. ; Dexter, Franklin ; Lubarsky, David. / Financial implications of a hospital's specialization in rare physiologically complex surgical procedures. In: Anesthesiology. 2005 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 161-167.
@article{c1de55a56a754744bb945849e9165aa7,
title = "Financial implications of a hospital's specialization in rare physiologically complex surgical procedures",
abstract = "Background: The authors previously identified a hospital that has a unique role in its region for surgical care. In children aged 0-2 yr, the hospital performed 64{\%} of all physiologically complex procedures statewide (≥ 8 American Society of Anesthesiologists Relative Value Guide basic units). For all age groups combined, 48{\%} of the physiologically complex procedures performed at that hospital were rare, defined as < 1/workday statewide. Methods: The authors tested the hypothesis that financially important differences can result from performing relatively large numbers of such specialized procedures. Methods were developed to compare contribution margin (revenue from facility and professional fees minus variable costs) per operating room hour (CM/OR hour) between patient groups and different types of surgical procedures. Results: CM/OR hour was significantly larger by a financially important amount (> $250/OR hour) for pediatric versus geriatric patients (P ≤ 0.002), primarily because of higher professional reimbursements, with no difference in hospital reimbursements. Unexpectedly, CM/OR hour was also significantly greater by at least $250 when a rare procedure was involved (P < 0.001 for all ages combined), primarily because of greater hospital reimbursements. For cases involving implant charges of $10,000 or greater, overall CM/OR hour was negative because increased revenues did not compensate for the high variable costs. Conclusions: Other hospitals can use these methods to perform a similar analysis of the financial impact of those patient populations or surgical procedures that are unique to their own roles in their regional healthcare systems, and to identify the sources of financial losses and gains experienced by the hospital.",
author = "Wachtel, {Ruth E.} and Franklin Dexter and David Lubarsky",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000542-200507000-00024",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financial implications of a hospital's specialization in rare physiologically complex surgical procedures

AU - Wachtel, Ruth E.

AU - Dexter, Franklin

AU - Lubarsky, David

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Background: The authors previously identified a hospital that has a unique role in its region for surgical care. In children aged 0-2 yr, the hospital performed 64% of all physiologically complex procedures statewide (≥ 8 American Society of Anesthesiologists Relative Value Guide basic units). For all age groups combined, 48% of the physiologically complex procedures performed at that hospital were rare, defined as < 1/workday statewide. Methods: The authors tested the hypothesis that financially important differences can result from performing relatively large numbers of such specialized procedures. Methods were developed to compare contribution margin (revenue from facility and professional fees minus variable costs) per operating room hour (CM/OR hour) between patient groups and different types of surgical procedures. Results: CM/OR hour was significantly larger by a financially important amount (> $250/OR hour) for pediatric versus geriatric patients (P ≤ 0.002), primarily because of higher professional reimbursements, with no difference in hospital reimbursements. Unexpectedly, CM/OR hour was also significantly greater by at least $250 when a rare procedure was involved (P < 0.001 for all ages combined), primarily because of greater hospital reimbursements. For cases involving implant charges of $10,000 or greater, overall CM/OR hour was negative because increased revenues did not compensate for the high variable costs. Conclusions: Other hospitals can use these methods to perform a similar analysis of the financial impact of those patient populations or surgical procedures that are unique to their own roles in their regional healthcare systems, and to identify the sources of financial losses and gains experienced by the hospital.

AB - Background: The authors previously identified a hospital that has a unique role in its region for surgical care. In children aged 0-2 yr, the hospital performed 64% of all physiologically complex procedures statewide (≥ 8 American Society of Anesthesiologists Relative Value Guide basic units). For all age groups combined, 48% of the physiologically complex procedures performed at that hospital were rare, defined as < 1/workday statewide. Methods: The authors tested the hypothesis that financially important differences can result from performing relatively large numbers of such specialized procedures. Methods were developed to compare contribution margin (revenue from facility and professional fees minus variable costs) per operating room hour (CM/OR hour) between patient groups and different types of surgical procedures. Results: CM/OR hour was significantly larger by a financially important amount (> $250/OR hour) for pediatric versus geriatric patients (P ≤ 0.002), primarily because of higher professional reimbursements, with no difference in hospital reimbursements. Unexpectedly, CM/OR hour was also significantly greater by at least $250 when a rare procedure was involved (P < 0.001 for all ages combined), primarily because of greater hospital reimbursements. For cases involving implant charges of $10,000 or greater, overall CM/OR hour was negative because increased revenues did not compensate for the high variable costs. Conclusions: Other hospitals can use these methods to perform a similar analysis of the financial impact of those patient populations or surgical procedures that are unique to their own roles in their regional healthcare systems, and to identify the sources of financial losses and gains experienced by the hospital.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744453502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21744453502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00024

DO - 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00024

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 1

ER -