Field Studies of French and Raven's Bases of Power. Critique, Reanalysis, and Suggestions for Future Research

Philip M. Podsakoff, Chester A. Schriesheim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

187 Scopus citations

Abstract

Among the most widely used conceptualizations of social power is the five-fold typology developed by French and Raven in 1959, and numerous field studies have used this conceptualization over the past few decades. Unfortunately, however, a majority of them suffer from severe methodological shortcomings that make their interpretation problematic at best. In this article, we discuss these problems and present a reanalysis of the literature, which strongly suggests that at least some of our knowledge about the five bases of power is methodologically suspect. Following this, we also present and discuss suggestions for improving future research in this domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-411
Number of pages25
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume97
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1985
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Field Studies of French and Raven's Bases of Power. Critique, Reanalysis, and Suggestions for Future Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this