Fiedler's least preferred coworker (LPC) instrument: An investigation of its true bipolarity

Chester Schriesheim, Nancy R. Klich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One methodological concern which exists with regard to the use of semantic differential measures is whether or not they meet the assumption of true bipolarity; if they do not, the use of interval-scale statistical analyses may distort data-analytic results and produce artifactual findings. This paper presents two tests examining the psychological midpoints of the 18 bipolar adjective pairs that make up the most current version of Fiedler's Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) instrument. In the weaker test, 131 subjects assessed scale midpoints by bisecting 18 five-inch lines which were anchored at their ends by Fiedler's adjective pairs. The results indicated that there were nonsignificant differences between the true scale midpoints and the midpoints identified by the subjects. In the stronger test, the adjectives were presented in three sets and the same 131 subjects ranked them based on the favorableness of each as an interpersonal descriptor. Using paired comparison treatment of the rank data (under Thurstone's Case III), the investigators found that six of the LPC adjective pairs deviated significantly from true bipolarity. Implications for future LPC use and for future research are considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-315
Number of pages11
JournalEducational and Psychological Measurement
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Semantic Differential
Matched-Pair Analysis
Psychological Tests
Midpoint
co-worker
Semantics
Research Personnel
test subject
semantic differential
Paired Comparisons
Descriptors
Interval
Line

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Education

Cite this

Fiedler's least preferred coworker (LPC) instrument : An investigation of its true bipolarity. / Schriesheim, Chester; Klich, Nancy R.

In: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 51, No. 2, 1991, p. 305-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cefae5ff1b804dba91e3ff5347734302,
title = "Fiedler's least preferred coworker (LPC) instrument: An investigation of its true bipolarity",
abstract = "One methodological concern which exists with regard to the use of semantic differential measures is whether or not they meet the assumption of true bipolarity; if they do not, the use of interval-scale statistical analyses may distort data-analytic results and produce artifactual findings. This paper presents two tests examining the psychological midpoints of the 18 bipolar adjective pairs that make up the most current version of Fiedler's Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) instrument. In the weaker test, 131 subjects assessed scale midpoints by bisecting 18 five-inch lines which were anchored at their ends by Fiedler's adjective pairs. The results indicated that there were nonsignificant differences between the true scale midpoints and the midpoints identified by the subjects. In the stronger test, the adjectives were presented in three sets and the same 131 subjects ranked them based on the favorableness of each as an interpersonal descriptor. Using paired comparison treatment of the rank data (under Thurstone's Case III), the investigators found that six of the LPC adjective pairs deviated significantly from true bipolarity. Implications for future LPC use and for future research are considered.",
author = "Chester Schriesheim and Klich, {Nancy R.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1177/0013164491512004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "305--315",
journal = "Educational and Psychological Measurement",
issn = "0013-1644",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fiedler's least preferred coworker (LPC) instrument

T2 - An investigation of its true bipolarity

AU - Schriesheim, Chester

AU - Klich, Nancy R.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - One methodological concern which exists with regard to the use of semantic differential measures is whether or not they meet the assumption of true bipolarity; if they do not, the use of interval-scale statistical analyses may distort data-analytic results and produce artifactual findings. This paper presents two tests examining the psychological midpoints of the 18 bipolar adjective pairs that make up the most current version of Fiedler's Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) instrument. In the weaker test, 131 subjects assessed scale midpoints by bisecting 18 five-inch lines which were anchored at their ends by Fiedler's adjective pairs. The results indicated that there were nonsignificant differences between the true scale midpoints and the midpoints identified by the subjects. In the stronger test, the adjectives were presented in three sets and the same 131 subjects ranked them based on the favorableness of each as an interpersonal descriptor. Using paired comparison treatment of the rank data (under Thurstone's Case III), the investigators found that six of the LPC adjective pairs deviated significantly from true bipolarity. Implications for future LPC use and for future research are considered.

AB - One methodological concern which exists with regard to the use of semantic differential measures is whether or not they meet the assumption of true bipolarity; if they do not, the use of interval-scale statistical analyses may distort data-analytic results and produce artifactual findings. This paper presents two tests examining the psychological midpoints of the 18 bipolar adjective pairs that make up the most current version of Fiedler's Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) instrument. In the weaker test, 131 subjects assessed scale midpoints by bisecting 18 five-inch lines which were anchored at their ends by Fiedler's adjective pairs. The results indicated that there were nonsignificant differences between the true scale midpoints and the midpoints identified by the subjects. In the stronger test, the adjectives were presented in three sets and the same 131 subjects ranked them based on the favorableness of each as an interpersonal descriptor. Using paired comparison treatment of the rank data (under Thurstone's Case III), the investigators found that six of the LPC adjective pairs deviated significantly from true bipolarity. Implications for future LPC use and for future research are considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973702805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973702805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0013164491512004

DO - 10.1177/0013164491512004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973702805

VL - 51

SP - 305

EP - 315

JO - Educational and Psychological Measurement

JF - Educational and Psychological Measurement

SN - 0013-1644

IS - 2

ER -