Fetal assessment for anesthesiologists: Are you evaluating the other patient?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Suboptimal communication between anesthesiologists and obstetricians can be associated with unintended poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially for emergency cesarean deliveries. Obstetricians use the results of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessments to assess fetal well-being and to make decisions about the timing and method of delivery. Because abnormal results may lead to the need for urgent or emergency cesarean deliveries, these decisions may directly impact anesthetic care. Lack of familiarity with fetal assessments and the significance of the results may thus hinder the communication necessary for optimal patient care. In this review article, we discuss the current antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment modalities, including the nonstress test, biophysical profile, Doppler velocimetry, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, fetal electrocardiogram (STAN-ST waveform analysis), and fetal pulse oximetry. The physiologic basis behind these modalities and the available evidence regarding their utility in clinical practice are also reviewed. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring categories, which are incorporated into the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for intrapartum care, is examined. The implications of test interpretation to the practice of obstetric anesthesiology is also discussed. Anesthesia provider understanding of fetal assessment modalities is essential in improving communication with obstetricians and improving the planning of cesarean deliveries for high-risk obstetric patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1278-1292
Number of pages15
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume116
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

Communication
Obstetrics
Emergencies
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)
Cardiotocography
Fetal Monitoring
Fetal Heart Rate
Oximetry
Anesthesiology
Rheology
Anesthetics
Patient Care
Electrocardiography
Anesthesia
Mothers
Guidelines
Education
Anesthesiologists
Recognition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fetal assessment for anesthesiologists : Are you evaluating the other patient? / Moaveni, Daria; Birnbach, David; Ranasinghe, Jayanthie; Yasin, Salih Y.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 116, No. 6, 01.06.2013, p. 1278-1292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b2c013df2b1487d94a0bac1afa28ba9,
title = "Fetal assessment for anesthesiologists: Are you evaluating the other patient?",
abstract = "Suboptimal communication between anesthesiologists and obstetricians can be associated with unintended poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially for emergency cesarean deliveries. Obstetricians use the results of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessments to assess fetal well-being and to make decisions about the timing and method of delivery. Because abnormal results may lead to the need for urgent or emergency cesarean deliveries, these decisions may directly impact anesthetic care. Lack of familiarity with fetal assessments and the significance of the results may thus hinder the communication necessary for optimal patient care. In this review article, we discuss the current antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment modalities, including the nonstress test, biophysical profile, Doppler velocimetry, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, fetal electrocardiogram (STAN-ST waveform analysis), and fetal pulse oximetry. The physiologic basis behind these modalities and the available evidence regarding their utility in clinical practice are also reviewed. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring categories, which are incorporated into the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for intrapartum care, is examined. The implications of test interpretation to the practice of obstetric anesthesiology is also discussed. Anesthesia provider understanding of fetal assessment modalities is essential in improving communication with obstetricians and improving the planning of cesarean deliveries for high-risk obstetric patients.",
author = "Daria Moaveni and David Birnbach and Jayanthie Ranasinghe and Yasin, {Salih Y}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828d33c5",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "1278--1292",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fetal assessment for anesthesiologists

T2 - Are you evaluating the other patient?

AU - Moaveni, Daria

AU - Birnbach, David

AU - Ranasinghe, Jayanthie

AU - Yasin, Salih Y

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Suboptimal communication between anesthesiologists and obstetricians can be associated with unintended poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially for emergency cesarean deliveries. Obstetricians use the results of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessments to assess fetal well-being and to make decisions about the timing and method of delivery. Because abnormal results may lead to the need for urgent or emergency cesarean deliveries, these decisions may directly impact anesthetic care. Lack of familiarity with fetal assessments and the significance of the results may thus hinder the communication necessary for optimal patient care. In this review article, we discuss the current antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment modalities, including the nonstress test, biophysical profile, Doppler velocimetry, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, fetal electrocardiogram (STAN-ST waveform analysis), and fetal pulse oximetry. The physiologic basis behind these modalities and the available evidence regarding their utility in clinical practice are also reviewed. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring categories, which are incorporated into the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for intrapartum care, is examined. The implications of test interpretation to the practice of obstetric anesthesiology is also discussed. Anesthesia provider understanding of fetal assessment modalities is essential in improving communication with obstetricians and improving the planning of cesarean deliveries for high-risk obstetric patients.

AB - Suboptimal communication between anesthesiologists and obstetricians can be associated with unintended poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, especially for emergency cesarean deliveries. Obstetricians use the results of antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessments to assess fetal well-being and to make decisions about the timing and method of delivery. Because abnormal results may lead to the need for urgent or emergency cesarean deliveries, these decisions may directly impact anesthetic care. Lack of familiarity with fetal assessments and the significance of the results may thus hinder the communication necessary for optimal patient care. In this review article, we discuss the current antepartum and intrapartum fetal assessment modalities, including the nonstress test, biophysical profile, Doppler velocimetry, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, fetal electrocardiogram (STAN-ST waveform analysis), and fetal pulse oximetry. The physiologic basis behind these modalities and the available evidence regarding their utility in clinical practice are also reviewed. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring categories, which are incorporated into the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for intrapartum care, is examined. The implications of test interpretation to the practice of obstetric anesthesiology is also discussed. Anesthesia provider understanding of fetal assessment modalities is essential in improving communication with obstetricians and improving the planning of cesarean deliveries for high-risk obstetric patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878396697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878396697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828d33c5

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828d33c5

M3 - Article

C2 - 23558831

AN - SCOPUS:84878396697

VL - 116

SP - 1278

EP - 1292

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 6

ER -