Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology

Ayad A. Farjo, Alan Sugar, Steven C. Schallhorn, Parag A. Majmudar, David J. Tanzer, William B. Trattler, John B. Cason, Kendall Donaldson, George D. Kymionis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes. Methods: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence. Results: The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 μm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber. Conclusions: Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOphthalmology
Volume120
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Ophthalmology
Lasers
Disclosure
Equipment and Supplies
Gases
Glare
Safety
Photophobia
Keratitis
Anterior Chamber
United States Food and Drug Administration
PubMed
Visual Acuity
Libraries
Language
Databases
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Farjo, A. A., Sugar, A., Schallhorn, S. C., Majmudar, P. A., Tanzer, D. J., Trattler, W. B., ... Kymionis, G. D. (2013). Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 120(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013

Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation : A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. / Farjo, Ayad A.; Sugar, Alan; Schallhorn, Steven C.; Majmudar, Parag A.; Tanzer, David J.; Trattler, William B.; Cason, John B.; Donaldson, Kendall; Kymionis, George D.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 120, No. 3, 01.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farjo, AA, Sugar, A, Schallhorn, SC, Majmudar, PA, Tanzer, DJ, Trattler, WB, Cason, JB, Donaldson, K & Kymionis, GD 2013, 'Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology', Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013
Farjo AA, Sugar A, Schallhorn SC, Majmudar PA, Tanzer DJ, Trattler WB et al. Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2013 Mar 1;120(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013
Farjo, Ayad A. ; Sugar, Alan ; Schallhorn, Steven C. ; Majmudar, Parag A. ; Tanzer, David J. ; Trattler, William B. ; Cason, John B. ; Donaldson, Kendall ; Kymionis, George D. / Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation : A report by the American academy of ophthalmology. In: Ophthalmology. 2013 ; Vol. 120, No. 3.
@article{5f8418cbe4eb4e2cac7e51998ddfcd3b,
title = "Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology",
abstract = "Objective: To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes. Methods: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence. Results: The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 μm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber. Conclusions: Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.",
author = "Farjo, {Ayad A.} and Alan Sugar and Schallhorn, {Steven C.} and Majmudar, {Parag A.} and Tanzer, {David J.} and Trattler, {William B.} and Cason, {John B.} and Kendall Donaldson and Kymionis, {George D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation

T2 - A report by the American academy of ophthalmology

AU - Farjo, Ayad A.

AU - Sugar, Alan

AU - Schallhorn, Steven C.

AU - Majmudar, Parag A.

AU - Tanzer, David J.

AU - Trattler, William B.

AU - Cason, John B.

AU - Donaldson, Kendall

AU - Kymionis, George D.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Objective: To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes. Methods: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence. Results: The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 μm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber. Conclusions: Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

AB - Objective: To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes. Methods: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence. Results: The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 μm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber. Conclusions: Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875226060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875226060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 23174396

AN - SCOPUS:84875226060

VL - 120

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 3

ER -