Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise

Eric S. Holmboe, Monica Yepes, Frederick Williams, Stephen J. Huot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Scopus citations

Abstract

We studied the nature of feedback given after a miniCEX. We investigated whether the feedback was interactive; specifically, did the faculty allow the trainee to react to the feedback, enable self-assessment, and help trainees to develop an action plan for improvement. Finally, we investigated the number of types of recommendations given by faculty. One hundred and seven miniCEX feedback sessions were audiotaped. The faculty provided at least 1 recommendation for improvement in 80% of the feedback sessions. The majority of the sessions (61%) involved learner reaction, but in only 34% of the sessions did faculty ask for self-assessment from the intern and only 8% involved an action plan from the faculty member. Faculty are using the miniCEX to provide recommendations and often encourage learner reaction, but are underutilizing other interactive feedback methods of self-assessment and action plans. Programs should consider both specific training in feedback and changes to the miniCEX form to facilitate interactive feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-561
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume19
Issue number5 PART 2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Direct observation
  • Evaluation
  • Feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this