Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: A research note

Michael Chaple, Stanley Sacks, Karen McKendrick, Lisa A. Marsch, Steven Belenko, Carl Leukefeld, Michael Prendergast, Michael French

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Despite evidence that treatment is effective in reducing recidivism among inmates with substance use problems, scarce resources mean that few of those in need of treatment actually receive it. Computerized substance abuse interventions could be used to expand access to treatment in prisons without placing an undue burden on resources. The major aim of the study was to compare treatment conditions in terms of their service utilization, skills acquisition, and treatment satisfaction. Methods: The study recruited men and women with substance use disorders from 10 prisons in 4 states. In an open label clinical trial, 494 subjects were randomly assigned either to the Experimental condition, a computerized drug treatment intervention, the Therapeutic Education System (TES; n = 249), or to the Control condition, Standard Care (n = 245). Chi-square tests compared groups on categorical variables and independent samples t tests were used for interval level continuous variables. Results: Initial evidence demonstrated: (1) comparable group rates of session attendance and high rates of TES module completion for experimental subjects; (2) comparable group gains in the development of coping skills; and (3) a more favorable view of TES than of Standard Care. Conclusions: Collectively, these results show that a computerized intervention, such as TES, can be implemented successfully in prison. Given the barriers to the delivery of substance abuse treatment typically encountered in correctional settings, computerized interventions have the potential to fill a significant treatment gap and are particularly well suited to inmates with mild to moderate substance use disorders who often are not treated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-127
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Experimental Criminology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

offender
correctional institution
substance abuse
Group
resources
education system
evidence
coping
utilization
drug

Keywords

  • Computerized intervention
  • Correctional settings
  • Offenders
  • Substance abuse treatment
  • Substance use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders : A research note. / Chaple, Michael; Sacks, Stanley; McKendrick, Karen; Marsch, Lisa A.; Belenko, Steven; Leukefeld, Carl; Prendergast, Michael; French, Michael.

In: Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 105-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chaple, M, Sacks, S, McKendrick, K, Marsch, LA, Belenko, S, Leukefeld, C, Prendergast, M & French, M 2014, 'Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: A research note', Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9187-y
Chaple, Michael ; Sacks, Stanley ; McKendrick, Karen ; Marsch, Lisa A. ; Belenko, Steven ; Leukefeld, Carl ; Prendergast, Michael ; French, Michael. / Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders : A research note. In: Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 105-127.
@article{6fddfb4c26ea476d8eecf4af28e5bfb9,
title = "Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders: A research note",
abstract = "Objectives: Despite evidence that treatment is effective in reducing recidivism among inmates with substance use problems, scarce resources mean that few of those in need of treatment actually receive it. Computerized substance abuse interventions could be used to expand access to treatment in prisons without placing an undue burden on resources. The major aim of the study was to compare treatment conditions in terms of their service utilization, skills acquisition, and treatment satisfaction. Methods: The study recruited men and women with substance use disorders from 10 prisons in 4 states. In an open label clinical trial, 494 subjects were randomly assigned either to the Experimental condition, a computerized drug treatment intervention, the Therapeutic Education System (TES; n = 249), or to the Control condition, Standard Care (n = 245). Chi-square tests compared groups on categorical variables and independent samples t tests were used for interval level continuous variables. Results: Initial evidence demonstrated: (1) comparable group rates of session attendance and high rates of TES module completion for experimental subjects; (2) comparable group gains in the development of coping skills; and (3) a more favorable view of TES than of Standard Care. Conclusions: Collectively, these results show that a computerized intervention, such as TES, can be implemented successfully in prison. Given the barriers to the delivery of substance abuse treatment typically encountered in correctional settings, computerized interventions have the potential to fill a significant treatment gap and are particularly well suited to inmates with mild to moderate substance use disorders who often are not treated.",
keywords = "Computerized intervention, Correctional settings, Offenders, Substance abuse treatment, Substance use",
author = "Michael Chaple and Stanley Sacks and Karen McKendrick and Marsch, {Lisa A.} and Steven Belenko and Carl Leukefeld and Michael Prendergast and Michael French",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11292-013-9187-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "105--127",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Criminology",
issn = "1573-3750",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a computerized intervention for offenders with substance use disorders

T2 - A research note

AU - Chaple, Michael

AU - Sacks, Stanley

AU - McKendrick, Karen

AU - Marsch, Lisa A.

AU - Belenko, Steven

AU - Leukefeld, Carl

AU - Prendergast, Michael

AU - French, Michael

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Objectives: Despite evidence that treatment is effective in reducing recidivism among inmates with substance use problems, scarce resources mean that few of those in need of treatment actually receive it. Computerized substance abuse interventions could be used to expand access to treatment in prisons without placing an undue burden on resources. The major aim of the study was to compare treatment conditions in terms of their service utilization, skills acquisition, and treatment satisfaction. Methods: The study recruited men and women with substance use disorders from 10 prisons in 4 states. In an open label clinical trial, 494 subjects were randomly assigned either to the Experimental condition, a computerized drug treatment intervention, the Therapeutic Education System (TES; n = 249), or to the Control condition, Standard Care (n = 245). Chi-square tests compared groups on categorical variables and independent samples t tests were used for interval level continuous variables. Results: Initial evidence demonstrated: (1) comparable group rates of session attendance and high rates of TES module completion for experimental subjects; (2) comparable group gains in the development of coping skills; and (3) a more favorable view of TES than of Standard Care. Conclusions: Collectively, these results show that a computerized intervention, such as TES, can be implemented successfully in prison. Given the barriers to the delivery of substance abuse treatment typically encountered in correctional settings, computerized interventions have the potential to fill a significant treatment gap and are particularly well suited to inmates with mild to moderate substance use disorders who often are not treated.

AB - Objectives: Despite evidence that treatment is effective in reducing recidivism among inmates with substance use problems, scarce resources mean that few of those in need of treatment actually receive it. Computerized substance abuse interventions could be used to expand access to treatment in prisons without placing an undue burden on resources. The major aim of the study was to compare treatment conditions in terms of their service utilization, skills acquisition, and treatment satisfaction. Methods: The study recruited men and women with substance use disorders from 10 prisons in 4 states. In an open label clinical trial, 494 subjects were randomly assigned either to the Experimental condition, a computerized drug treatment intervention, the Therapeutic Education System (TES; n = 249), or to the Control condition, Standard Care (n = 245). Chi-square tests compared groups on categorical variables and independent samples t tests were used for interval level continuous variables. Results: Initial evidence demonstrated: (1) comparable group rates of session attendance and high rates of TES module completion for experimental subjects; (2) comparable group gains in the development of coping skills; and (3) a more favorable view of TES than of Standard Care. Conclusions: Collectively, these results show that a computerized intervention, such as TES, can be implemented successfully in prison. Given the barriers to the delivery of substance abuse treatment typically encountered in correctional settings, computerized interventions have the potential to fill a significant treatment gap and are particularly well suited to inmates with mild to moderate substance use disorders who often are not treated.

KW - Computerized intervention

KW - Correctional settings

KW - Offenders

KW - Substance abuse treatment

KW - Substance use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897763630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897763630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11292-013-9187-y

DO - 10.1007/s11292-013-9187-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897763630

VL - 10

SP - 105

EP - 127

JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology

JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology

SN - 1573-3750

IS - 1

ER -