Favorable Evaluations of Blacks and the Handicapped: Positive Prejudice, Unconscious Denial, or Social Desirability?

Charles S Carver, David C. Glass, Irwin Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has shown that subjects in an impression formation setting rated an interviewee more favorably if he was labeled as either black or physically handicapped than if he was not labeled. This seems to contradict common assumptions about the nature of stigma. Three interpretations of these findings are advanced: They may reflect actual positive biases held by college students regarding members of these outgroups; they may represent unconscious distortions of subjects' true feelings; or they may represent conscious distortions of true feelings in order to make socially desirable responses. The present study was undertaken to test the third possibility by means of a so‐called bogus pipeline manipulation, in which some subjects were led to believe that the experimenter had access to their actual feelings about the interviewee. The results indicated that the high rating of the black was a social desirability phenomenon, but the high rating of the handicapped person was not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1978

Fingerprint

Social Desirability
Disabled Persons
Emotions
Students
Research
Unconscious (Psychology)
Denial (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Favorable Evaluations of Blacks and the Handicapped : Positive Prejudice, Unconscious Denial, or Social Desirability? / Carver, Charles S; Glass, David C.; Katz, Irwin.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1978, p. 97-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5345f64af2f40aab38ba94b584ddd94,
title = "Favorable Evaluations of Blacks and the Handicapped: Positive Prejudice, Unconscious Denial, or Social Desirability?",
abstract = "Prior research has shown that subjects in an impression formation setting rated an interviewee more favorably if he was labeled as either black or physically handicapped than if he was not labeled. This seems to contradict common assumptions about the nature of stigma. Three interpretations of these findings are advanced: They may reflect actual positive biases held by college students regarding members of these outgroups; they may represent unconscious distortions of subjects' true feelings; or they may represent conscious distortions of true feelings in order to make socially desirable responses. The present study was undertaken to test the third possibility by means of a so‐called bogus pipeline manipulation, in which some subjects were led to believe that the experimenter had access to their actual feelings about the interviewee. The results indicated that the high rating of the black was a social desirability phenomenon, but the high rating of the handicapped person was not.",
author = "Carver, {Charles S} and Glass, {David C.} and Irwin Katz",
year = "1978",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00768.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "97--106",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Favorable Evaluations of Blacks and the Handicapped

T2 - Positive Prejudice, Unconscious Denial, or Social Desirability?

AU - Carver, Charles S

AU - Glass, David C.

AU - Katz, Irwin

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - Prior research has shown that subjects in an impression formation setting rated an interviewee more favorably if he was labeled as either black or physically handicapped than if he was not labeled. This seems to contradict common assumptions about the nature of stigma. Three interpretations of these findings are advanced: They may reflect actual positive biases held by college students regarding members of these outgroups; they may represent unconscious distortions of subjects' true feelings; or they may represent conscious distortions of true feelings in order to make socially desirable responses. The present study was undertaken to test the third possibility by means of a so‐called bogus pipeline manipulation, in which some subjects were led to believe that the experimenter had access to their actual feelings about the interviewee. The results indicated that the high rating of the black was a social desirability phenomenon, but the high rating of the handicapped person was not.

AB - Prior research has shown that subjects in an impression formation setting rated an interviewee more favorably if he was labeled as either black or physically handicapped than if he was not labeled. This seems to contradict common assumptions about the nature of stigma. Three interpretations of these findings are advanced: They may reflect actual positive biases held by college students regarding members of these outgroups; they may represent unconscious distortions of subjects' true feelings; or they may represent conscious distortions of true feelings in order to make socially desirable responses. The present study was undertaken to test the third possibility by means of a so‐called bogus pipeline manipulation, in which some subjects were led to believe that the experimenter had access to their actual feelings about the interviewee. The results indicated that the high rating of the black was a social desirability phenomenon, but the high rating of the handicapped person was not.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986349418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986349418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00768.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00768.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986349418

VL - 8

SP - 97

EP - 106

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 2

ER -