Family physician attitudes about HIV screening

John Ryan, L. A. Aday, N. K. Hansel, G. T. Oser, M. E. Clasen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined why and for whom family physicians are likely to require HIV screening according to general policies or procedures, based on a national survey of 2,660 family practice physicians. Of those contacted, 1,678 responded, yielding a response rate of 63.7%. The study also examined whether attitudes toward screening differed for physicians in different types of practices, of varying educational backgrounds, and with differing opinions regarding treating persons with AIDS (PWAs). The results showed that required screening was most strongly endorsed for pregnant women who had other risk factors and for i.v. drug users. Those physicians who most favored mandatory screening were also most likely to favor the mandatory reporting of AIDS cases to public health officials. They also had the least formal medical training (were not residency trained or board certified) and expressed the greatest apprehension regarding their own and their staff's preparedness and willingness to treat PWAs. A major implication of the findings is that family physicians and others who do mandatory testing should be provided opportunities, through residency training, board-certification preparation, or continuing medical education, to learn how to care for those patients they test who turn out to be seropositive.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)835-840
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume5
Issue number8
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Family Physicians
Mandatory Testing
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HIV
Internship and Residency
Mandatory Reporting
Physicians
Continuing Medical Education
Family Practice
Certification
Drug Users
Pregnant Women
Patient Care
Public Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Ryan, J., Aday, L. A., Hansel, N. K., Oser, G. T., & Clasen, M. E. (1992). Family physician attitudes about HIV screening. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 5(8), 835-840.

Family physician attitudes about HIV screening. / Ryan, John; Aday, L. A.; Hansel, N. K.; Oser, G. T.; Clasen, M. E.

In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 5, No. 8, 01.01.1992, p. 835-840.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryan, J, Aday, LA, Hansel, NK, Oser, GT & Clasen, ME 1992, 'Family physician attitudes about HIV screening', Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 835-840.
Ryan J, Aday LA, Hansel NK, Oser GT, Clasen ME. Family physician attitudes about HIV screening. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 1992 Jan 1;5(8):835-840.
Ryan, John ; Aday, L. A. ; Hansel, N. K. ; Oser, G. T. ; Clasen, M. E. / Family physician attitudes about HIV screening. In: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 1992 ; Vol. 5, No. 8. pp. 835-840.
@article{bd698cd07138469691664e2ea57dd0fc,
title = "Family physician attitudes about HIV screening",
abstract = "This study examined why and for whom family physicians are likely to require HIV screening according to general policies or procedures, based on a national survey of 2,660 family practice physicians. Of those contacted, 1,678 responded, yielding a response rate of 63.7{\%}. The study also examined whether attitudes toward screening differed for physicians in different types of practices, of varying educational backgrounds, and with differing opinions regarding treating persons with AIDS (PWAs). The results showed that required screening was most strongly endorsed for pregnant women who had other risk factors and for i.v. drug users. Those physicians who most favored mandatory screening were also most likely to favor the mandatory reporting of AIDS cases to public health officials. They also had the least formal medical training (were not residency trained or board certified) and expressed the greatest apprehension regarding their own and their staff's preparedness and willingness to treat PWAs. A major implication of the findings is that family physicians and others who do mandatory testing should be provided opportunities, through residency training, board-certification preparation, or continuing medical education, to learn how to care for those patients they test who turn out to be seropositive.",
author = "John Ryan and Aday, {L. A.} and Hansel, {N. K.} and Oser, {G. T.} and Clasen, {M. E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "835--840",
journal = "Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)",
issn = "1525-4135",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family physician attitudes about HIV screening

AU - Ryan, John

AU - Aday, L. A.

AU - Hansel, N. K.

AU - Oser, G. T.

AU - Clasen, M. E.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - This study examined why and for whom family physicians are likely to require HIV screening according to general policies or procedures, based on a national survey of 2,660 family practice physicians. Of those contacted, 1,678 responded, yielding a response rate of 63.7%. The study also examined whether attitudes toward screening differed for physicians in different types of practices, of varying educational backgrounds, and with differing opinions regarding treating persons with AIDS (PWAs). The results showed that required screening was most strongly endorsed for pregnant women who had other risk factors and for i.v. drug users. Those physicians who most favored mandatory screening were also most likely to favor the mandatory reporting of AIDS cases to public health officials. They also had the least formal medical training (were not residency trained or board certified) and expressed the greatest apprehension regarding their own and their staff's preparedness and willingness to treat PWAs. A major implication of the findings is that family physicians and others who do mandatory testing should be provided opportunities, through residency training, board-certification preparation, or continuing medical education, to learn how to care for those patients they test who turn out to be seropositive.

AB - This study examined why and for whom family physicians are likely to require HIV screening according to general policies or procedures, based on a national survey of 2,660 family practice physicians. Of those contacted, 1,678 responded, yielding a response rate of 63.7%. The study also examined whether attitudes toward screening differed for physicians in different types of practices, of varying educational backgrounds, and with differing opinions regarding treating persons with AIDS (PWAs). The results showed that required screening was most strongly endorsed for pregnant women who had other risk factors and for i.v. drug users. Those physicians who most favored mandatory screening were also most likely to favor the mandatory reporting of AIDS cases to public health officials. They also had the least formal medical training (were not residency trained or board certified) and expressed the greatest apprehension regarding their own and their staff's preparedness and willingness to treat PWAs. A major implication of the findings is that family physicians and others who do mandatory testing should be provided opportunities, through residency training, board-certification preparation, or continuing medical education, to learn how to care for those patients they test who turn out to be seropositive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026781464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026781464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1517969

AN - SCOPUS:0026781464

VL - 5

SP - 835

EP - 840

JO - Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)

JF - Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)

SN - 1525-4135

IS - 8

ER -