Fallacies in the textual analysis of the communibiological literature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a result of Nelson's (2004) textual analysis of the communibiological literature, he concluded that the motive of the scholars contributing to the literature was the desire for status. In this essay, I expose the fallacious nature of Nelson's analysis and raise questions about the approach he employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-467
Number of pages12
JournalCommunication Theory
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fallacies
Textual Analysis
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Fallacies in the textual analysis of the communibiological literature. / Beatty, Michael.

In: Communication Theory, Vol. 15, No. 4, 11.2005, p. 456-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2303053b65b47ddac3c46fd95f2374b,
title = "Fallacies in the textual analysis of the communibiological literature",
abstract = "As a result of Nelson's (2004) textual analysis of the communibiological literature, he concluded that the motive of the scholars contributing to the literature was the desire for status. In this essay, I expose the fallacious nature of Nelson's analysis and raise questions about the approach he employed.",
author = "Michael Beatty",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/ct/15.4.456",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "456--467",
journal = "Communication Theory",
issn = "1050-3293",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fallacies in the textual analysis of the communibiological literature

AU - Beatty, Michael

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - As a result of Nelson's (2004) textual analysis of the communibiological literature, he concluded that the motive of the scholars contributing to the literature was the desire for status. In this essay, I expose the fallacious nature of Nelson's analysis and raise questions about the approach he employed.

AB - As a result of Nelson's (2004) textual analysis of the communibiological literature, he concluded that the motive of the scholars contributing to the literature was the desire for status. In this essay, I expose the fallacious nature of Nelson's analysis and raise questions about the approach he employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844590318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844590318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ct/15.4.456

DO - 10.1093/ct/15.4.456

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27844590318

VL - 15

SP - 456

EP - 467

JO - Communication Theory

JF - Communication Theory

SN - 1050-3293

IS - 4

ER -