Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability

Michael M. Vigoda, David Lubarsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the "active" medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1798-1802
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume102
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Legal Liability
Anesthesia
Vital Signs
Intraoperative Complications
Anesthetics
Anesthesiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability. / Vigoda, Michael M.; Lubarsky, David.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 102, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 1798-1802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98c92f40616e4eda8b6ff29bb43b1d1b,
title = "Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability",
abstract = "Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the {"}active{"} medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window.",
author = "Vigoda, {Michael M.} and David Lubarsky",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000217235.25350.5e",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "1798--1802",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability

AU - Vigoda, Michael M.

AU - Lubarsky, David

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the "active" medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window.

AB - Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the "active" medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744479147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744479147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000217235.25350.5e

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000217235.25350.5e

M3 - Article

C2 - 16717328

AN - SCOPUS:33744479147

VL - 102

SP - 1798

EP - 1802

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 6

ER -